Channel
@phdustoz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
441subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002418243697 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @phdustoz |
| Description | Ma'ruza va suhbatlar: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCs1PykxGCtWI_g1hwSFNtoQ Vebsait: phdustoz.uz |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/phdustoz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:05 | 441 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:49 | 441 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 7 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (7 April 2026 – 27 July 2026) |
| Views total | 220 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
170 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 45 | 26.5% | |
| ❤ | 40 | 23.5% | |
| 👍 | 33 | 19.4% | |
| 👏 | 25 | 14.7% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 11.8% | |
| 👎 | 7 | 4.12% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 170reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Barchaga assalomu alaykum, Avvalo, postlar to'xtab qolishiga qaramay, kanalda qolayotganingiz uchun rahmat. Shuningdek, tanishimiz sohaga oid tadqiqot o'tkazayotgan ekanlar. Siz ham o'z fikrlaringizni bo'lishsangiz: Ushbu tadqiqot O‘zbekistondagi doktorantlar va mustaqil izlanuvchilarning doktorantura jarayonidagi tajribalarini o‘rganishga qaratilgan. Unda doktoranturani boshlashdagi tayyorgarlik, ilmiy ko‘nikmalar…
❤4
Amerika universitetlari bitiruv marosimlarida sun'iy intellekt bilan bog'liq holat bo'yicha kichik video qildim. Shu masala bo'yicha fikrlaringiz qiziq. P.S. video sifatiga e'tibor bermaysiz https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtsi-UK1rLI
👍6
Paulu Freire "Mazlumlar pedagogikasi" Najod — ta’limda. So’nggi yillarda bu shiorni jamoatchilik maydonida tobora ko’proq eshita boshlagandaymiz. Ammo bu ibora qanchalik nafis bo’lsa, shunchalik mavhum ham. Nega najot va nimadan najot? Nega aynan ta’lim najot bo’lishi kerak, eng muhimi — qanaqa ta’lim? "Ta’lim" va "najot" deganda biz nimani nazarda tutamiz? Albatta, umumiy, intuitiv darajada hammamiz nimaga ishora q…
❤3👍2
Siz startap qilish haqida o’ylaganmisiz? Quyidagi maqolada yurtimizdagi startapchilarning ta’limi haqida tahlil qilishibdi. Azada hamma o’z dardini aytib yig’laydi deganlariday, men yuqori darasi borlarga e’tibor berdim. 224 ta asoschi (founder) ichidan bor yo’g’i 1.8% (4 ta) odamda PhD, 18,8% (42) esa magistr darajasi bor ekan. Shuningdek, asoschilar bitirgan ta’lim sohalari ichida AKT (IT), Biznes, Iqtisod va Mu…
👎3
Photo, posted without a caption
👎2👍1
Taqrizchilarning barcha izohlarini hisobga olganingda 😅 Jason Thatcher sahifasidan
😁22👎2👍1
Westminster universitetiga Iqtisod, Moliya, Biznes, Huquq, Ta'lim Boshqaruvi, AKT yo'nalishlarida yordamchi tadqiqotchilar kerak ekan. Batafsil: https://vacancy.wiut.uz/Vacancies/Details?id=17056
❤5
Jurnal tanlash muammosi Yuqoridagi postdan normal jurnallarni tanlash (topish)da nimalarga e’tibor berish kerak degan savol o’rtaga chiqyapti. Menimcha quyidagilarga e’tibor berish kerak: 1. Avvalo hamma biladigan akademik databazalar (Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct) yoki taniqli nashriyotlar (Springer, Taylor, Elsevier)ni tekshirish mumkin. Lekin muammoli tomoni, ba’zi jurnallar databazaga kirib olgandan…
👍5
#4 “Xorijiy jurnal” illuziyasi: ilmmi yoki marketing? Bugun yana bir “xalqaro jurnal” trendda: Academic Journal of Digital Economics and Stability. Manzil — Ispaniya. Sayt — oddiy OJS. Talab — deyarli yo‘q. Lekin maqtov baland: “Maqolam xorijiy jurnalda chiqdi!” Bu ilmmi yoki o‘zimizni aldashmi? Menimcha bu ilmiy jurnal emas. Bu — xizmat. Biz yoshlarni buzayapmiz. Ularga: ❌ “kuchli ilm qil” demayapmiz ✔️ “qay…
👍3
Project Hail Mary (Проект Конец Cвета) filmini ko’rdingizmi? Kosmik sarguzashtlar va ilm-fan haqida olingan eng qiziq filmlardan biri deb o’ylayman. Interstellerdan qolishmaydi. Qisqacha, maktabda aniq fanlardan dars beradigan o’qituvchi yerni qutqarib qoladigan koinot missiyasida qatnashib muvaffaqiyatga erishadi. Qolganini treyler va filmdan ko’rsangiz bo’ladi. Ortiqcha spoiler qilmayman. Bizga qiziq jihatlari: …
❤3
Ilm bilan shug'ullanish yaxshi baho va IQ ko'rsatkichlardan ko'ra xarakterga, uzoq muddat yo'lda sobit bo'lishga bog'liqligiga misol
👍9🔥6😁1
Ustozingiz sizga qilgan eng katta yaxshiligi nima? Nature nashri dunyo bo’ylab 3700 ta doktorantlardan o’tkazgan so’rovnomasida yuqoridagi savolga javob izlabdi. Tadqiqotning asosiy tezislarini keltirib o’taman, batafsil esa saytiga kirib o’qisangiz bo’ladi: 1. Meni hamkasb sifatida ko’rib, menga ishondi 2. Qo’rqqan ishlarimni qilishimga turtki berdi 3. Farzand ko’rish haqidagi qarorimni hurmat qildi (qo’lladi)…
❤6👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @phdustoz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 773,919 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PhD Ustoz” (@phdustoz), 441 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/phdustoz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.