6 measurements spanning 35 days, net +16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 63–83 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Sept 2026, 03:18
81
+1
3 Sept 2026, 02:28
80
+12
27 Aug 2026, 16:16
68
+2
14 Aug 2026, 14:14
66
+1
10 Aug 2026, 02:16
65
no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:31
65
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 8 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
14 reactions across 10 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
11
78.6%
👏
3
21.4%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 8 March 2026 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
في مصدر floger
دائما كل فصل فيه ملخص لابرز خطوات الحل,
وهذه الصورة هي لهندسة المفاعلات حيث تبين خطوات واضحة ومرتبة للحل.
وطبعا من خلال هذه الخطوات نشتق خطوات اصغر لكن بشكل عام هذه خطوات اساسية في حل كل مسئلة أو ( اكثر المسائل) التي نستخدمها .
#reactor_engineering
اذا كطالب دارس مادة heat transfer وحسيت نفسك من درسته مافهمت هيج شيء مقارب وحليت فقط مسائل مو مشكلة ابدا لان النظام التعليمي هو بهذا الشكل
🎯 اذا تحب تطور نفسك وتفهم وتربط مع واقع تكدر ترجع للاي مصدر وتحدد اواقات معينة او خلال العطل لتفهم بشكل اعمق تكدر تبحث عن الإنترنت او بمساعدة ادوات الذكاء الاصطناعي.
ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ
✅ايضا حاول تدرس بهذه الطريقة كل ماتكمل موضوع معين حتى يتسنى لكم فهم صحيح واعم…
تصميم مبادل حراري:
طلب منك تبريد زيت ثقيل والمدير او العميل او الشركة گالوا الك يامهندس ما نريد تكلفة عالية وكفاءة مانريد نريد فقط تبريد عادي:
فشنو راح تختار
طريقة in-line
او staggered؟
ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ
اكيد نختار طريقة in-line
ليش؟
لان تكلفة اقل لان سهل تنظيف من بقايا المائع
والمائع زيت=يعني سائل وهاي طريقة تستخدم اكثر للسوائل.
لكن طريقة الجريان بيه مستقيم يعني lamier مو مضطرب يعني انتقال حرارة …
هذا المصدر هو كالعمود الفقري لطالب الهندسة الكيميائية
اسهل مصدر من بين الذين ذكرتهم
اذا كان اساسكم ضعيف في الثرموادينمك راجع اول 6 فصول منه.
يحتوي فصول لها ربط مع منهج الثرموداينمك
وبما ان الثرموداينمك او الديناميكا الحرارية أساس من الخرسان في الهندسة الكيميائية
فهذا المصدر يعتبر كنز.
اسئلة منوعة بمختلف المستويات عكس المصادر الاخرى حيث تكون problem
مستوى عالي.
اللغة سهلة وواضحة للفهم تلائم جداً طالب البكلوريوس …
على ذكر المصادر نرفق لكم مقارنة بين افضل مصدر لدراسة وتقوية في الكيمياء الفيزيائية
تفيد لمن يعاني بشكل خاص من مادة الثرموداينمك في "المرحلة الثالثة "
حيث اذا اعاد دراسة فصول الاساسية الثرموداينمك سيكون سهلا وسلساً.
وهنا نرفق لكم تكنيكات حل اي problem كاملة، من مصدر علمي.
ونشير الى كمية الأسرار والفوائد التي تحتويها المصادر رغم ذلك نجد دائما ان الطالب يكره استخدام المصدر ويفضل ملزمة لاتغطي المادة سوى رؤس اقلام للمراجعة واخذ فكرة عن المادة فقط.
#basics
أو كمثال خطوات مثل التي اسفلها باللون الأحمر خطوات واضحة:-
تبين الاساس العلمي للمهندس حين يحل المشكلة.
أضافة الى اتاحة درجة اعلى للطالب.
وتسهل بناء خطة الحل للطالب حين يحل اي مشكلة.
#basics
حيث حفظ هذه المعادلات يتيح للمهندس
حلول معادلات معقدة بواسطة معادلات ماكسويل المختصرة كما تظهر في الصورة
والتي تبسط الحل
🔰لذا اذا تحس اكو خلل او نقص دائماً من تحل معادلات الثرموادينمك الاساسية
✅او الكيمياء الفيزيائية جرب تضبط هاي معادلات.
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ph_chem_ENG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
ب dimensions analysis
عدنه طريقتين للحل
📍طريقة رايلي و نظرية بانكغهام 🔰السؤال هنا يمتى تعرف كمهندس اي وحدة منهم تستخدم؟ #fluid_mechanical
من عندي متغيرات قليلة اقل او يساوي 4 نستهدم رايلي0%
من اريد علاقة مباشرة استخدم رايلي0%
من عدي متغيرات كبيرة واريد اقللها الى منتجات بلا وحدات يعني dimensionless ف اكيد بانكغهام57%
كل ماذكر صحيح43%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 8 March 2026 to 18 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الهندسة الكيمياوية” (@ph_chem_ENG), 81 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ph_chem_ENG.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.