America is WINNING AGAIN 🎰 Since returning to office, President Trump has: 🏆 Cut taxes 🏆 Driven down crime 🏆 Secured the border 🏆 Opened federal lands 🏆 Unleashed American energy 🏆 Attracted BILLIONS in investment Today, @POTUS delivers remarks in Nevada. Don't miss it!

Channel
Patrick Gunnels
@pgunnels1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
898subscribers
-151 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002487281680 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pgunnels1 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pgunnels1 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:27 | 898 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 900 | -149 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:08 | 1,049 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:24 | 1,048 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:19 | 1,047 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:27 | 1,047 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 1,049 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 10m 40s
- Average length
- 1m 11s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
18 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🙏 | 7 | 38.9% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 33.3% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 22.2% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Stealing from the American people is unacceptable. We've allowed it to go on for too long in this country. Not under #VP and the Task Force to Eliminate Fraud. 🇺🇸
💸 THE NEW GLOBAL SYSTEM IS ALREADY LIVE 💸 $100 is just the starting line. 📈 Behind closed doors, central banks are quietly plugging trillions into #XRP to anchor the new financial infrastructure. They want you distracted while they accumulate. The Reset is inevitable—and XRP is the master key to the global network. 🦅🌐 COMMENT & FOLLOW if you're holding for the shift! 💥👇
🔥 BREAKING UPDATE: President Trump Declares the Restoration of the American Republic — “US INC.” DISSOLVED, COMMON LAW SOVEREIGNTY RETURNS HISTORIC: Trump dissolves “US Inc.” and reestablishes America under Common Law. Military officers summoned. Deep State power revoked. The U.S. is now a sovereign Constitutional Republic — no more foreign rule. “US INC.” DISSOLVED, COMMON LAW SOVEREIGNTY RETURNS
President Trump posts an image of himself during the revolutionary war, fighting against tyranny as he is now.🇺🇸
SWEET MOTHER MARY OF NAZARETH! They’re going to REVALUE GOLD. 😳 That move would push XRP over $100,000 as USD collapses and XRP remains the only global neutral settlement layer. #XAUa
❤2
The uncomfortable truth about awakening? You start to see through everything... The masks. The lies. The illusions. Nothing feels the same anymore — because it isn't. Once you awaken, there's no going back. You can't unsee what you've seen. You can't unfeel what your soul now knows. And that's the gift... and the responsibility. Stay awake. Stay true. The illusion only has power if you believe in it.
🔥2
💥[TIER 4B APPOINTMENT EXECUTION & SECURITY LOCKDOWN] Following the live ISO 20022 ledger override and the permanent disconnection of the central banking cartels, the operational focus now shifts directly to the individual holder deployment phase. While the legacy networks attempt to normalize the backend commercial freezes under standard IT updates, the QFS quantum routing nodes are actively preparing the primary c…
❤1
🚨 Over 500 Banks Are Ready To Flip The Switch On Ripple RIPPLE has assigned banking IDs to over 500 BANKS. These IDs function as routing references to facilitate transaction processing within Ripple’s payment ecosystem, similar to internal codes for directing funds. What’s stopping the liquidity to hit XRP? 1) Legal Clarity: The Clarity Act would open the legal floodgates for institutions to adopt digital assets.…
🚨Donald Trump placed #XRP as the first digital asset for the U.S. Crypto Reserve! 💥XRP IS A DONE DEAL💥
🔥 BOMBSHELL ANNOUNCEMENT DONALD: Trump Saves 2 Million American Farms — THE DEATH TAX IS DEAD AND FAMILY LEGACIES ARE SECURED! President Trump permanently ended the unfair estate tax, saving 2 million American family farms from extinction and securing generational wealth. Read the full report now! 🔥 THE WAR ON FAMILY FARMS: ENDING THE UNFAIR ESTATE TAX
🚨 THE CLARITY ACT: NO MORE EXCUSES 🚨 Holding $XRP $XLM $HBAR? The game just changed. For years, Wall Street and banks used the exact same fallback script: Institutional custody? "We need clarity first." ETF approvals? "We need clarity first." Mass bank adoption?
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pgunnels1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@pgunnels1 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Patrick Gunnels” (@pgunnels1), 898 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pgunnels1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.