Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for поиграем в декаданс | перекур

Channel

поиграем в декаданс | перекур

@pgrmvdkdns

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

89subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001857684765
TypeChannel
Username@pgrmvdkdns
Created6 December 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pgrmvdkdns

Growth

899089.57 August 2026 — 90 subscribers9 August 2026 — 90 subscribers15 August 2026 — 89 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 89–90 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 05:3389-1
9 Aug 2026, 14:3390no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:5790first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 3 September 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

192 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5227.1%
🥰3920.3%
3819.8%
💘2714.1%
❤‍🔥2110.9%
🍓94.69%
😱42.08%
💔21.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 192reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 3 September 2024 to 21 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Dec 2025, 19:08 UTC188 views22 reactionsread 9 August 2026

добрый вечер, мои прекрасные! на всякий случай напоминаю: я не ушла из фд, я на перекуре, пытаюсь заработать рак легких, раз. если по каким-то причинам контент-мейкеры, которые не любят мои работы и почему-то(?) меня, хоть мы и ни разу не знакомы, но при этом смело берут идеи и меняют парней «местами», если так можно выразиться, думают, что я это не замечаю, то плохо думаете и плохо списываете, два. и как факт, и в

17❤‍🔥3🔥1🥰1

24 Feb 2025, 09:00 UTC453 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥10💘1

23 Feb 2025, 17:45 UTC428 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥8💘21

16 Jan 2025, 21:28 UTC417 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026

короче, я нахер закрываю этот хаус, никто не сделал дз. вернуть суегик в мангу было задано еще 3 года назад, нахуя вступать в хаус, если вам поебать на дз

🔥12💘41

13 Dec 2024, 16:57 UTC438 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @intiooPhoto

щорвалраншм

💘52

13 Dec 2024, 05:11 UTC382 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @intiooPhoto

я жива если чо

🥰72

22 Nov 2024, 00:33 UTC436 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

а какую цель несут заглавные буквы в нике?

🔥131

11 Nov 2024, 21:33 UTC415 views22 reactionsread 9 August 2026

боже, готовьтесь, я вам скоро принесу еду

🥰12🔥5😱41

7 Nov 2024, 05:42 UTC567 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026

мне уже 24 стукнуло, а котят в манге так и нет! кощунство!

💘13🔥3

19 Oct 2024, 15:41 UTC555 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

как ощущается перечитывать одни и те же работы на архиве по пейрингу который шипперит полтора испанца и китаец не говорящий на английском

🔥13

4 Oct 2024, 20:06 UTC380 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @intiooPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🥰6

13 Sept 2024, 20:26 UTC289 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @intiooPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🥰6💘21

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @pgrmvdkdns. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,351,253 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“поиграем в декаданс | перекур” (@pgrmvdkdns), 89 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pgrmvdkdns.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.