Channel
@pggfyx
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
20subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002636789375 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pggfyx |
| Description | Telegram 代表自由和隐私，并拥有许多易于使用的功能 @jpzmk Telegram快讯台 @pgyl11 电报资讯汇 @dbkfu 电报频道观察 @pgyxi Telegram每日精选 @pcpg88 电报新闻与标签 @pgyl99 FZ电报资讯站 @pgyl22 电报中文简报 @tgsqss CNN电报精选 @pgyl55 Telegram最新情报 @wgyl66 电报频道导航 @hyylfff #Telegram #使用指南 #综合知识库 #TG知识库 #中文知识库 #中文语言 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pggfyx |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 20 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 20 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 29 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
18 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎉 | 8 | 44.4% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 38.9% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 11.1% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 29 March 2026 to 12 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
@tgss1Bot 🎁 发现一个超棒的搜索机器人！ * 公开交流: https://t.me/xhpla * 担保公群: https://t.me/dhgjdq * 插阴社群: https://t.me/hpylc * 葵花宝典: https://t.me/xhkef * 暗网社区: https://t.me/dbdh8 * 图标表情: https://t.me/jpzmk * TG知识库: https://t.me/jpzhk * 武林秘籍: https://t.me/wlmji * 高清影视: https://t.me/jpzgj 👉 点击加入：https://t.me/tgss1Bot?start=aW52Ojc1MjMyNDA1MTU
🗣 掏心窝子说点大实话：关于“全局搜索”的底层逻辑 很多兄弟找我做TG全局搜索排名，我这人向来喜欢把丑话说在前面：上全局只是起步，后期的“维护”才是真正的资金流玩法！ 找我做排名的客户里，有纯小白，也有以前做上去但没维护好掉下来、现在死活上不去的。我见过太多这样的情况：客户刚上全局，尝到了流量的甜头、产生了利润，但很少有人愿意拿出利润的一半甚至三分之一去继续维护。 你要明白一个残酷的现实： 全局搜索不是挂上去了就一劳永逸 @hpylc 为什么有些冷门词没人做？因为大家不知道流量好不好 @dhgfyl 当你花钱做出了现成的案例，同行一看你流量不错，立马就会砸钱来竞争。 所谓“摸着石头过河”，如果你不舍得维护，那你就是同行过河踩的那块石头！ ⚠️紧急防骗提醒 ！！！ 这两天我做了大量的频道占位（其中不乏几万人的大群）结果“李鬼”立马就闻着味儿来了！我刚搜了一下，已经有人开始恶意高仿我的用户名准备行骗！ ✅ 我的唯一官方账…
👍1
大家请使用正版Telegram 拒绝🆘盗版Btok是盗版 使用盗版访问不了“东皇官方群” 官方地址： https://telegram.org 加速器下载： https://d.z8n.net/rrdb88 在使用Btok软件的请下载正版Telegram 文件是[Telegram安卓手机安装包] #IOS苹果手机 直接在应用市场 搜索Telegram进行下载 需要挂加速器VPN才能登入！ #VPN需要用到海外ID “#电脑PC端然后下载Telegram平台” 1:首先下载加速器挂好VPN 2:进入官方网站：https://telegram.org/ 3:直接下载PC端的Telegram 【⚠️电脑用户一定记住禁止下载陌生人发送的文件夹解压包，全部是病毒】 市面上还有替换收款地址的盗版Telegram 使用第三方盗版前发USDT收款地址一定要截图核实清楚 ⭐️ 点击返回自助服务 ⭐️ 📣 官方公告 @wgylc8 🌊 防…
🎉1
Just starting your channel? Getting your first hundred followers is no easy task — but here’s what can help you get off the ground 👇 💌 Tell your friends and family Send a quick message or drop a note in your group chats. Explain what you’ll be sharing and why it might be interesting. 📢 Use your other social profiles Post something short, like: “Testing a new format — faster, more real, no filters.” Even a small pos…
🎉1
✅专注telegram引流，快速增加订阅粉丝 引流上粉频道 https://t.me/fjflq 人工客服 @xkflq
👏2❤1🎉1
✅专注telegram引流，快速增加订阅粉丝 引流上粉频道 https://t.me/tzgif 人工客服 @pc66pc
❤1🎉1
✅专注telegram引流，快速增加订阅粉丝 引流上粉频道 https://t.me/pc9288 人工客服 @uu365u
❤2🎉1
✅专注telegram引流，快速增加订阅粉丝 引流上粉频道 https://t.me/dhjtq 人工客服 @dhgfpd
❤1🎉1
✅专注telegram引流，快速增加订阅粉丝 引流上粉频道 https://t.me/u365com 人工客服 @u365uu
❤1🎉1
✅专注telegram引流，快速增加订阅粉丝 引流上粉频道 https://t.me/u365com 人工客服 @u365uu
❤1🎉1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @pggfyx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,427,895 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@pggfyx named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TG引流|电报拉人｜飞机推拉｜纸飞机拉手｜Tellegrm ｜Goup” (@pggfyx), 20 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pggfyx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.