Channel
@pfonwti
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
250subscribers
+33 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002944936513 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pfonwti |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pfonwti |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:07 | 250 | +26 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 224 | +7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:00 | 217 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 217 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 4 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (4 May 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,438 |
| Reactions total | 118 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
275 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 209 | 76.0% | |
| ⚡ | 54 | 19.6% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 3.27% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.727% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.364% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 275reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
America Delenda Est, Viva Northwest We are a working class family organism devoted to establishing sustainable all white communities in the Pacific Northwest. Our goal is to break away from this distasteful nation which has not, and never will allow us to prosper. We will build our own republic one man, one family, and one community at a time. Be apart of something greater and get involved today.
❤21
Support for our fellow brethren is everything in this stage. We need to put our egos behind us as a whole and come together as one organism, as one family, and as one race. The black sun will settle upon our lands and we will exist in unity like our ancestors once had. Our weakest link is our strongest soldier. We must build each other up because the sky is the limit, individualism means nothing in the triumphant bat…
❤14💯1
Part 2 by Comrade Spucky America has historically been a collection of latent and nascent nations beholden to a deracinated, imperial American identity. The Northwest is one of such nascent nations. Americanists may grant leeway to expressions of local pride or even the rare cry for outright sovereignty, yet they vehemently reject any approach that does not involve "national" collaboration for the end goal of a rev…
⚡10❤2
A Two Part Essay on the inviability of American identity and the dismantling of Americanist arguments submitted in collaboration by two comrades. Part Two will be posted tomorrow. America Delenda Est, Viva Northwest Part One by Comrade Miffy What makes an American? Many in the White-identity sphere today will tell you it's not a set of rules, or a document, or passport; there is something deeper in the blood that …
❤15
Only after the beast system is razed to the ground, can our people be truly free. Many disciples will be needed to fan the flames, but it all starts with a spark.
❤24⚡2
New Book Club podcast episode! Taylor and Shawn are joined by John Northwest to discuss Harold Covington’s famous novel The Brigade, and the ideas of the Northwest Front on America, economics, strategies for the White struggle, and more. Notes: 0:00 - Introducing the book and its importance 5:12 - Material conditions, human capital, and revolutionary potential 25:08 - Man too racist for the ethnostate 38:40 - "Deat…
❤17
Photo, posted without a caption
❤10🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤16
White man, will you join your brothers in the Pacific Northwest or will you abandon us for the dying nation that was once America? Americanism is a plague which must be stopped. The Butler plan is the only way forward! 🇺🇸 Werwolf Radio Cascadia 🇺🇸
❤15
Ladies and Gentlemen, the New Northwest Front website is HERE https://nw-underground.org/
❤13😁2🔥1
There seems to be a recurring issue that we as Northwest Separatists are faced with. That issue being groups and people who believe that simply because we are also racially conscious Whites that we ought to support another movement or ideal! Why? Why should we give out some nonsensical seal of approval? It would be effectively undermining what we stand for! The only way our race is getting out of this mess is by the…
⚡14❤4
Ten hearts, one beat. One hundred hearts, one beat. Ten thousand hearts, one beat. We were born to fight and die and to continue the flow of our people. The future is now. Stand up like men and drive the enemy to the sea. Stand up like men and swear a sacred oath upon the green graves of our sires that you will reclaim what our forefathers discovered, explored, conquered, settled, built, and died for. Stand up like m…
❤19🔥3⚡2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @pfonwti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 122,570 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pacific Forest Operative” (@pfonwti), 250 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pfonwti.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.