Channel
@petya_108
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
164subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002471680526 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @petya_108 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/petya_108 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 164 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 165 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:42 | 165 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 24 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
42 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28 | 66.7% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 11.9% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 9.52% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 7.14% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @petya_108. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 May 2026 to 28 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Во многом его подход напомнил мне «Путешествие героя» Джозефа Кэмпбелла. В любой хорошей истории герой не становится сильнее благодаря новым знаниям. Настоящее изменение начинается в тот момент, когда он переступает через самый большой страх. Именно там происходит внутренняя трансформация У Петра есть похожее понятие - «поступок силы». Это не подвиг и не героизм. Это действие, которое страшно сделать именно тебе. Че…
❤6🔥1
Последнее время в моей жизни появился человек, который неожиданно стал для меня очень экологичным ментором - Пётр Шталинский @PShtalinskiy Наверное, больше всего меня зацепило то, что он вообще не про достигаторство в привычном смысле. Не про «стань лучшей версией себя за 30 дней», не про мотивацию и не про постоянную гонку за следующим результатом Его подход скорее про внутренний переход Он часто говорит, что нов…
❤5👍1
Мой социальный проект ❤
❤7🙏3
Санкара паччая виньяна Монахи повторяют эту фразу как мантру: реакция порождает сознание. Не сознание рождает реакции, а наоборот - сначала реакция, а сознание уже достраивается вокруг неё, как оправдание задним числом То есть по сути мы и есть набор реакций. На внутреннее, на внешнее, на человека, который не ответил на сообщение. Звучит немного обидно для эго, которое любит думать о себе как о чём-то цельном и осм…
🔥2
Пятничная подборка духовных мемов с меттой и состраданием 🤡❤
👍2🔥1
Дочитал последнего Пелевина - не ждал откровений, прошлые две книжки до конца не осилил Читал месяц параллельно с «Силой подсознания» Диспензы и Суттами в режиме: визуализация целей и медитация на равностность Книга удачно вышла в мае, а не в сентябре как обычно у Олеговича и прекрасно легла на поствипассановые инсайты, а именно на практику трилакшана - три признака существования: • аничча - непостоянство • дукха -…
Photo, posted without a caption
Начал читать нового Пелевина и наткнулся на историю, от которой до сих пор не могу отойти В книге упоминается реальный мальчик с Шри-Ланки - Дхаммаруван. С 2 лет он спонтанно пел сутты палийского Канона - сотни древних текстов, которым его никто не учил. Он просто помнил их из прошлой жизни, где был монахом-чтецом Я давно верю в реинкарнацию - не как в красивую метафору, а как в живую реальность, которую начинаешь …
❤6🕊2🔥1
File, posted without a caption
Откуда берутся наши страдание? Всё начинается с пяти дверей Глаза. Уши. Нос. Язык. Тело. Это входы - через них реальность попадает внутрь. Каждую секунду через эти двери проходят тысячи сигналов И вот тут начинается самое интересное Механика ловушки Сигнал вошёл → мгновенно возникает ведана — оценка. Приятно. Неприятно. Нейтрально. Это происходит быстрее мысли Автоматически. Ты ещё ничего не решил - а тело уже с…
❤3👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @petya_108. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,053,568 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Петя Пустота 0️⃣” (@petya_108), 164 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/petya_108.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.