Channel
@petrzelainterpreter
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
970subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001305879979 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @petrzelainterpreter |
| Description | Да, я им был. Пишу, о чем знаю и хочу. О чем не знаю и не хочу - не пишу. В общем, здесь про футбол |
| Created | 1 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/petrzelainterpreter |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 970 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 970 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (19 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,086 |
| Reactions total | 133 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 21:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
159 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 44 | 27.7% | |
| 👍 | 41 | 25.8% | |
| 😁 | 31 | 19.5% | |
| 👏 | 14 | 8.81% | |
| 🤣 | 12 | 7.55% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 3.77% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 2.52% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 1.26% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 1.26% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.629% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.629% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.629% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
"Ахмат" уже приучил, что с ним идут играть, как на расстрел: готовятся не только взламывать, как Махачкалу, но и получать на своей половине, терпеть, вылезать, хитрить. И все же. Пусть "Краснодар" последние двадцать минут отбивается от "бумажного" середняка, пусть "Ахмат" Черчесова выдирает с боем ничью. Все равно проскальзывают у Грозного моменты бесклассицы, когда можно бы и 2:1 сделать, и 3:1, а все обрывается на…
👍1👏1
Уже не раз упоминал это место в канале, ходил туда, практически целенаправленно летал 6 лет. Был бы очень рад, если бы кто-то взялся исполнить волю владельцев - вдохнуть новую жизнь.. Контакты - в профиле канала кафе-бара https://t.me/FANATcafebar/839
😢2❤1👀1
Иногда нужно просто как угодно выиграть, чтобы начать все заново. При этом думаю все же, "Балтика" бьется головой в потолок - победу добывали почти без контригры в последние двадцать минут. Но это уже проблемы "Динамо" - там тренеру есть о чем подумать. Только очень смешной человечек скажет, что результат несправедлив. Андрея Викторовича и штаб с победой.
👍6👏2❤1❤🔥1
Остается теперь вопрос: в каком смысле "полететь", а не в каком настроении https://t.me/kazakovIlya1/4781
😁6
"Динамо" пока сыроватое во всех смыслах (льет по-прежнему и ещё грозу обещают). Телефон даже переделывает на "сероватое", но я пока правлю.. Какой-то идиот (вроде, популярный, но не помню имени) недавно наехал публично на Тюкавина, но пока все проверки Латышонку (узнаю старого злого Женю) организовала пара его касаний и быстрое мышление.
👍6
Ещё немного балтийской экзотики Если человеку не нужен Порш, попрошу отдать.. Вообще, дождь снова зарядил. Матчи со снегопадами здесь уже были, теперь посмотрим, как с этим..
😁2
"Балтика" приплыла на матч с "Динамо" Октябрьский остров в Калининграде, как когда-то и предсказывали, начал проседать.
😱4🔥2🤔1
Вратарские истории в РПЛ, замешанные на "Балтике" Не так давно Латышонок в одну калитку выиграл конкуренцию у Бориско (справедливости ради, новой звезде ЦСКА мешали проблемы со здоровьем), затем точно так же вынес Адамова в "Зените" Но бывают спринтеры и стайеры. Женю подвела старая особенность, о которой я, конечно, упоминал: неумение сидеть на лавке и ждать. Тем не менее, оценкой его возможностей можно считать эк…
👏7👍3❤2
Начал отсматривать матчи РПЛ, которые не видел онлайн "Локо" и "Ахмат", как будто, не изменились. Если так, то это плюс для "Ахмата", а не для "Локо". Хозяев планомерно душили движением и давлением и должны были бы утопить, но в том и суть, что в этом плане Грозный пока в реалиях прошлого сезона - когда едят-едят, но доесть не могут. Из показательного: Самородов растит объемы работы на поле, он уже значительно фун…
👍6
Случай в концертном зале прямо сейчас Дедушка, вообще не выглядящий, как завсегдатай концертных залов, пристально смотрит на меня и говорит: "Вы очень похожи на Аршавина" Если бы он сказал, что у меня на голове вишнёвое дерево, я бы меньше удивился..
🤣12😁5
Лицо у Альшина безрадостное, конечно, как будто ему кусок комбикорма дали. Понятно, что проиграли, понятно, что парень был по-настоящему счастлив лишь когда играл в "Балтике" в ФНЛ, но все же.. Но шаг хороший, эти все статуэтки и кубки из магазина напротив или из старой ленинской комнаты уже осточертели. Опять сейчас кто-то скажет, что перенимаем зловредные европейские традиции, но если хорошая тема - и спонсора под…
😁5
Когда-то вот про Тедича из "Акрона" писали вот такое👇 Интересно, он совсем до мышей стерся? https://t.me/wildscout/107
👍4😁2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @petrzelainterpreter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 762,558 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Židkov. Переводчик Петржелы. Футбол. Статьи. Мнения. Обычно против большинства” (@petrzelainterpreter), 970 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/petrzelainterpreter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.