Channel
@petren_ko
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
331subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001191518800 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @petren_ko |
| Created | 23 October 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/petren_ko |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 331 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 330 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 330 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 22 March 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 March 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
216 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 139 | 64.4% | |
| 👎 | 17 | 7.87% | |
| 🤯 | 17 | 7.87% | |
| 😁 | 11 | 5.09% | |
| 🤮 | 10 | 4.63% | |
| 🤔 | 8 | 3.70% | |
| 💩 | 5 | 2.31% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 1.85% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.926% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 0.926% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.463% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 216reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 March 2022 to 25 March 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 9 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 20 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The channel will remain accessible for all users.
The account of the user that owns this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If it remains inactive in the next 10 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel may no longer have an owner.
The account of the user that owns this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If it remains inactive in the next 17 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel may no longer have an owner.
The account of the user that owns this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If it remains inactive in the next 30 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel may no longer have an owner.
Мой друг, и просто замечательный и самый крутой адвокат по уголовке в городе Омске завёл свой телеграм-канал. Игорь Анатольевич Суслин, наверное, последний адвокат в Омске, которого можно назвать адвокатом в изначальном смысле этого слова, которое когда-то звучало ещё не обидно. Советую подписаться. https://t.me/advokatigorsuslin/11
👍21👎7🤔1🤬1
Приносим извинения — обсуждали между собой, и произошёл «технический сбой»))
😁8
Коротко и емко о фондовом рынке в России. Если кто не заметил, с ним все… И это не преувеличение. Торги по ценным бумагам остановлены. На британской бирже акции Сбербанка по центу. https://t.me/sibirmedia/19061
👍11👎4
Вижу тут наши чиновники бесятся насчёт того, что в сети появилось интервью Зеленского с российскими журналистами. Это интервью запрещено публиковать всем СМИ в России. Я сам его, честно, не смотрел, но может кому-то из вас захочется…
👍10👎4🤬1
Все что нужно знать о том, как в России борятся со здравым смыслом. Еще бы разогнались на своих Мерседесах и в столб… Может, мозги бы на место встали)) 155 тыс. пар обуви достаточно, чтобы обуть целый небольшой город провинциальный, где многие люди сейчас не могут позволить себе приобрести новую пару обуви.
🤯5👍1
Вот это поворот, а я то думаю: зачем Польша так быстро увеличивает армию с 160 до 300 тыс человек… Так вот оно в чем дело. Главное, чтобы на Украине не решили восстановить границы Киевской Руси, а то сами понимаете, не удобно получится, если Москва станет провинцией))) Условно: в России по официальным данным армия составляет около 900 тыс человек. Если Украина выступит с хотя бы 500 тыс. бойцов, то с поляками это …
👍9🤮7👎2😁2🤔1
Photo, posted without a caption
🤯4😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @petren_ko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 604,779 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@petren_ko named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Петренко и Ко” (@petren_ko), 331 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/petren_ko.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.