25 Aug 2025, 11:34 UTC445 viewsread 10 August 2026
Staking 150+ tokens on superearn.com
Channel
Peter Schiff
@peterschiff
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
65subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002378925686 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @peterschiff |
| Description | Chief Economist & Global Strategist http://Europac.com, Chairman http://SchiffGold.com, Founder https://SchiffSovereign.com, Host http://SchiffRadio.com Managed by @cryptodeveloper |
| Created | 27 February 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/peterschiff |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 65 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:55 | 65 | first reading |
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 27 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 1
- Links
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 27 February 2025 to 25 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
6 Mar 2025, 21:38 UTC652 viewsread 10 August 2026
The U.S. Jan. trade deficit soared to a record $131.4 billion. The U.S. economy has never been more dependent on foreign productivity, so tariffs now will bite consumers harder than ever. Also, Challenger just announced 172K job cuts in Jan., the most since COVID in April 2020.
6 Mar 2025, 21:38 UTC651 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
So far in 2025, the S&P 500 is down 2.25%, the QQQ down 3.5%, and the RUT down 7.4%. But stocks are up 9.2% in the U.K., 14.3% in Switzerland, 15% in France, 16.4% in China, 18.3% in Spain, 21.3% in Germany, & 21.4% in Hong Kong. The Trump trade is sell U.S. & buy foreign stocks.
❤1
3 Mar 2025, 06:17 UTC657 viewsread 10 August 2026
I get the rationale for a Bitcoin reserve. I don't agree with it, but I get it. We have a gold reserve. Bitcoin is digital gold, which is better than analog gold. So let's create a Bitcoin reserve too. But what's the rationale for an XRP reserve? Why the hell would we need that?
27 Feb 2025, 07:56 UTC504 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo
It looks like there is a high probability that at a minimum Bitcoin drops back into the $50K - 60K range, just below MSTR's average cost. Why is there so much complacency?
27 Feb 2025, 07:56 UTC352 viewsread 10 August 2026
Trump just said he wants to have a balanced budget in a year or two, maybe sooner. If he's serious all he needs to do is let Congress know that he won't sign the $4 trillion increase in the debt ceiling and by law the budget must be balanced this year. That meets his time frame.
27 Feb 2025, 07:56 UTC320 viewsread 10 August 2026
The only way Trump can sell one million, let alone ten million Golden Visas is if the recipients receive a lifetime exemption from all federal income, estate, and gift taxes. If he does that he actually has a shot at paying off the National Debt. This plan might actually work.
27 Feb 2025, 07:56 UTC280 viewsread 10 August 2026
I wonder if some traders who are short $MSTR and long Bitcoin decided to unwind a portion of that position today.
27 Feb 2025, 07:56 UTC267 viewsread 10 August 2026
America was founded by rugged individuals who created government to secure their rights and leave them alone. Americans today want government to violate other people's rights, steal their stuff, and give it to them. The home of the free has become the land of the freeloader.
27 Feb 2025, 07:55 UTC256 viewsread 10 August 2026
I listened in on a popular Bitcoin Spaces and one of the hosts was asked if MSTR went bankrupt would it have to sell its Bitcoin to pay off its debts. Incredibly, he answered "no," that MSTR would never have to sell its Bitcoin. Even the so -called Bitcoin experts are clueless!
27 Feb 2025, 07:33 UTCviews —
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @peterschiff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 220,196 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Peter Schiff” (@peterschiff), 65 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/peterschiff.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.