2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 195–197 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Sept 2026, 08:22
196
no change
11 Sept 2026, 07:47
196
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Links
2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
212 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
81
38.2%
👍
74
34.9%
😁
20
9.43%
🤣
11
5.19%
🔥
6
2.83%
👏
5
2.36%
💯
4
1.89%
🥰
4
1.89%
🌭
3
1.42%
🙏
2
0.943%
👎
1
0.472%
😍
1
0.472%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 212 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2024 to 11 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
من آزمون پنجم رو آخر این هفته قرار میدم ( چون هنوز تحلیل آزمون سومتون تکمیل نشده و حتی از آزمونهای دیگه هم هنوز دارم ازتون جواب دریافت میکنم)
ولی اگه بخوام دربارهی آزمون پنجم یک توضیح کوتاه بدم اینه که این آزمون رو باید کسانی که در رابطه عاطفی قرار دارند جواب بدهند(یعنی شما و پارتنرتون).خلاصه که اگه در رابطه عاطفی قرار دارید که خوش به حالتونه و اگه قرار ندارید تا آخر هفته فرصت دارید که قرار بگیرید😂
دوستان عزیز
تحلیل آزمون چهارم برای افرادی که شرکت کردند انجام شد(به جز کسانی که فرمت پاسخدهیشون رو تغییر ندادند)
من به دلیل مشغلهی کاری تا دو روز آینده شاید نتونم تحلیل جدیدی انجام بدم.صبور باشید حتما پاسخگو خواهم بود.
همینطور که مشخصه سعی شده آزمون چهارم خیلی دقیق بررسی بشه.دقت آزمونها در آینده بالاتر هم خواهد رفت.
دوستانی که آزمون چهارم رو شرکت کردند و من هنوز نتایج رو خدمتشون ارسال نکردم و فرمت اعلام نتایجشون شبیه شکل زیر نیست لطفا یکبار فرمت رو تصحیح کنند و مجددا برام ارسال کنند
1.الف
2. ب
3. ج
4. ج
5. ج
6. ج
7. ج
8. ب
9. ج
10. الف
منظورم از اصلاح فرمت جواب اینه که لطفا جلوی هر شماره سوال فقط گزینه رو بنویسید یا خالی بگذارید.از نوشتن متن جواب خودداری بشه لطفا
آزمون چهارم
در این تست، شما باید به ۱۰ سوال پاسخ دهید. هر سوال چهار گزینه خواهد داشت.در این آزمون مجاز هستید هیچ یک از گزینههارا انتخاب نکنید
1. وقتی کسی که به او اعتماد داری، به طور ناگهانی به تو پاسخ نمیدهد، چه احساسی داری؟
- الف) احساس میکنم که دیگر به من اهمیت نمیدهد.
- ب) فکر میکنم شاید مشکلی برایش پیش آمده است.
- ج) نگران میشوم که ممکن است از دست من ناراحت باشد.
- د) فکر میکنم که عمداً میخو…
سلام دوستان.آزمون چهارم تا دقایقی دیگر بر روی کانال قرار میگیره.
لازمه دوباره یادآوری کنم تحلیل آزمون رایگانه و فقط کافیه جوابهاتون رو داخل پیوی من ارسال کنید
درود دوستان
من لینک آزمون سوم رو از دسترس خارج کردم.افرادی که تا الان آزمونشون رو ثبت کردند تحلیلشون رو تا انتهای این هفته دریافت میکنند.
ممنون از همراهیتون
سلام.شبتون بخیر.متاسفانه استقبال از این آزمون به نسبت دو آزمون قبل خیلی پایینتر بود و احتمالا به دلیل تعریف شدنش به شکل فرم باشه.در حال حاضر امکان اینکه خارج از این محیط آزمون رو ازتون دریافت کنم ندارم ولی حتما سعی میکنم راجبش یک فکری کنم.
با توجه به پایین اومدن جامعه آماری آزمون سوم ازتون میخوام که لینک آزمون رو برای افرادی که میشناسید به اشتراک بگذارید.
در صورت به اشتراک گذاری لینک حتما داخل پیوی بهم بگید که چن…
سلام دوستان
آزمون سوم در لینک زیر قرار داره .لطفا حتما به ویسی که در ادامه میفرستم قبل از وارد شدن به آزمون خوب گوش بدید.
از همکاریتون سپاسگزارم
https://forms.gle/s14z4fZGQtuZsW7p9
درود دوستان.خواستم یک نکتهای رو یادآوری کنم.
تعدادی از شما که آزمون یک رو شرکت کردند هنوز جواب آزمون دومشون رو برام نفرستادند.
خواستم بگم هر آزمون توانایی اینو داره که شمارو به چند دستهبندی کلی تقسیم کنه.ترکیب آزمونهای مختلف میتونه ویژگیهای شمارو جزئیتر شناسایی کنه و حتی تناقضاتتون رو توی پاسخدهی آشکار کنه.
پس لطفاً تا جایی که میتونید آزمونها رو کامل شرکت کنید.
ممنونم
پاسخ اختلال نهان در آهنگ
قبل از هرچیز اشاره کنم که تشخیص هر اختلالی وظیفه متخصصه و اینکار بیشتر جنبه بالا بردن اطلاعات عمومی و فان داره.در این شعر میتوان طیفهای مختلفی از اختلالات را مشاهده کرد
1. Anxiety Disorder(اختلال اضطرابی):
- "Feels like the walls are all closin' in"
- "And the devil's knockin' at my door, whoa"
- "Out of my mind, how many times"
- "Did I tell you I'm no good at bein' alone?"
…
من این مورد رو بررسی کردم.با توجه به اینکه شرکت کنندگان این آزمون در حال افزایشه جلسه مجازی برگزار کردن باعث میشه افراد جدید این جلسه رو از دست بدهند.
در نتیجه قصد دارم برای این آزمون همون کدنویسی رو انجام بدم.اتفاق مثبتی که با این کار میفته اینه که میتونم در زمان کوتاهتر تحلیلهای دقیقتری براتون انجام بدم.و در آینده نزدیک با الگوریتمهای یادگیری ماشین تحلیلهاتون رو شخصی سازی شدهتر کنم.
❤6👍2👏2🙏2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @personology_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2024 to 11 August 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@personology_channel named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@personology_pv named in 1 post, 12 September 2026 – 12 September 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
🏆 English Stories 🏆 @all_englishstories · 22,783 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 20 September 2026
آتیه آفرینان | مرکز تخصصی امور مهاجرت @applyabroadnow · 27,188 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تست شخصیت شناسی” (@personology_channel), 196 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/personology_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.