Channel
@persikdedart
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
88subscribers
+29 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002157463242 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @persikdedart |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/persikdedart |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:43 | 88 | +32 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 56 | -3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 59 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 59 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 26 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
256 reactions across 8 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5346164763648870440 | 72 | 28.1% | |
| custom 5469816223560651009 | 22 | 8.59% | |
| custom 5240240922985245840 | 21 | 8.20% | |
| custom 5188691853620302872 | 19 | 7.42% | |
| custom 5238242719515549021 | 18 | 7.03% | |
| 🌚 | 17 | 6.64% | |
| custom 5222257254966768806 | 16 | 6.25% | |
| custom 5305512223882379446 | 15 | 5.86% | |
| custom 5456346596235032871 | 15 | 5.86% | |
| 🍓 | 15 | 5.86% | |
| custom 5470124065341586353 | 12 | 4.69% | |
| 👻 | 7 | 2.73% | |
| 🍌 | 4 | 1.56% | |
| 💊 | 3 | 1.17% |
Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 256reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 26 December 2025 to 5 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @persikdedart. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 December 2025 to 5 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Какой-то вайб в традишке всё же есть 🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️
custom 53461647636488704407custom 54563465962350328713custom 52382427195155490212custom 52402409229852458402custom 54701240653415863532🌚1🍓1👻1
Signed ᴋᴦбɯниᴋ | ᴄʜᴇᴋ ʙɪᴏ⁷¹⁰⁺ʳᵉᵖ
✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ Одна бессонная ночь буквально перед защитой и готовая дипломная работа, на которую давался целый год, bruh momeeent. Все в комиссии оценили её на 5, так ещё и плюсик поставила эксперт с другого города🌟🤩 Радости полные штаны, но вгоняет в тоску то, что это наша предпоследняя встреча таким обалденным составом(
custom 51886918536203028724🍓3custom 52382427195155490212custom 53461647636488704402custom 54701240653415863532🌚1👻1custom 52222572549667688061
Signed ᴋᴦбɯниᴋ | ᴄʜᴇᴋ ʙɪᴏ⁷⁰⁰⁺ʳᵉᵖ
Наш последний просмотр☝️
custom 54701240653415863534custom 53461647636488704403🍓2custom 51886918536203028722custom 52222572549667688062custom 52382427195155490212custom 52402409229852458402custom 54563465962350328712
Signed ᴋᴦбɯниᴋ | ᴄʜᴇᴋ ʙɪᴏ⁷⁰⁰⁺ʳᵉᵖ
раскраскеее🌟
🌚7custom 53461647636488704406custom 52382427195155490214custom 54698162235606510093🍓2custom 51886918536203028722custom 52222572549667688062custom 52402409229852458402
Signed ᴋᴦбɯниᴋ | ᴄʜᴇᴋ ʙɪᴏ⁶⁹⁰⁺ʳᵉᵖ
гыгыгы вот они слева на право, мои первые попытки рисовать на гп, так ещё и с @blondmanjunkie :D (тут могла быть реклама магмы)
custom 534616476364887044019custom 54698162235606510099🌚6🍌2🍓2💊2custom 51886918536203028722custom 52222572549667688062
Signed ᴋᴦбɯниᴋ | ᴄʜᴇᴋ ʙɪᴏ⁶¹⁰⁺ʳᵉᵖ
Тоже решила порадовать девочку, которая рисует китиков
custom 530551222388237944610custom 53461647636488704408custom 52222572549667688063custom 54563465962350328713custom 52382427195155490212custom 52402409229852458402custom 54698162235606510092🌚1
Signed ᴋᴦбɯниᴋ | ᴄʜᴇᴋ ʙɪᴏ ⁶⁰⁰⁺ʳᵉᵖ
кошечка милая очень ну это заказик,мне самой оч нравится #заказ #котыыы@rashelooo0
custom 534616476364887044012custom 52222572549667688064custom 52402409229852458403custom 53055122238823794463👻2custom 51886918536203028722custom 52382427195155490212custom 54698162235606510092
Signed ᴋᴦбɯниᴋ | ᴄʜᴇᴋ ʙɪᴏ ⁶⁰⁰⁺ʳᵉᵖ
последние пару дней у мед сестёр прошли как в концлагере🙂
custom 534616476364887044015custom 52402409229852458409custom 51886918536203028725🍓3custom 52382427195155490212custom 53055122238823794462custom 54698162235606510092👻1
Signed ᴋᴦбɯниᴋ | ᴄʜᴇᴋ ʙɪᴏ⁵⁵⁵⁺ʳᵉᵖ
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @persikdedart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,318,340 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🍑ᴨич чᴇнᴇᴧ” (@persikdedart), 88 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/persikdedart.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.