Channel
@pernecher
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
420subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002308845811 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pernecher |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pernecher |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:05 | 420 | +6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:51 | 414 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 411 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (2 July 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,306 |
| Reactions total | 220 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
475 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 209 | 44.0% | |
| custom 5350826211914300449 | 102 | 21.5% | |
| custom 5451709719477504296 | 81 | 17.1% | |
| custom 5265068131763635785 | 56 | 11.8% | |
| custom 5395451420335949140 | 27 | 5.68% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 475reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pernecher. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🚦Личная Сила — это те объемы и та сложность/многослойность/глубина жизни, которую вы способны выдержать на долгой дистанции, а не то количество медитаций и практик с ютьюбчика, которое вы перепробовали, чтобы ее «прокачать». Всё :)
custom 535082621191430044926❤11custom 52650681317636357855custom 54517097194775042961
Всем привет! Наглядно о важности состояния в магии и в жизни Вы когда-нибудь задумывались о том, что когда у в целом богатого человека случаются проблемы с материальным, про него никто не начинает говорить, что он бедный? В ход идут выражения: на мели, тяжелый период, затянули пояса и тому подобное, но никогда не «он теперь бедняк». Потому что все приведенные выше фразы очень четко указывают на конечность состояния,…
❤18custom 54517097194775042967custom 53508262119143004491
Доброе утро! Сегодняшний день начался с завершения огромного ритуального цикла, в котором я избавлял мою замечательную клиентку и ученицу от многолетнего подселенца, которого другие практики считывали как «помощника» Не могу не поделиться с вами её ценными словами. Все благословения тем, кто под моим крылом🌙🧨
❤21custom 52650681317636357855custom 54517097194775042964
И СНОВА ПРО «ШИЗОТЕРИКУ»🤩
❤15custom 53508262119143004499custom 54517097194775042967
Очередное доброе утро, в которое я с вот таким ⬆️ лицом изнемогаю от крЫнжа, который выдают коллеги-эзотерики на пространствах сети интернет Расскажу ниже в гс-ке, буквами я не наору так, как требует ситуация
❤14custom 54517097194775042969custom 52650681317636357857
🐰Про Богов Как вы знаете, я до мозга костей проводник и жрец. В моей жизни много взаимодействия с Силами, я часто обращаюсь к своим Богам за ответом, благословением, помощью Тем паче это происходит тогда, когда я попадаю в большую событийную петлю, нахожусь на пороге нового уровня своей жизни. Конечно, когда я решил, что мне нужно купить машину, я сразу же упал в полусознании на пол и начал молиться Меркурию (не ри…
custom 545170971947750429614❤7custom 52650681317636357856
Много думаю о судьбах нашего с вами дела, друзья. Грустно, что магия за последние несколько лет превратилась в субкультуру Помните, раньше были готы, говнари, ванильки, эмо, педовки? Сейчас где-то между ними затесались т.н вичтокеры, самозабвенно играющие в людей силы. У них есть свои кумиры, свои сообщества, свои эстетические и культурные коды Плохо ли это? Скорее неизбежно, как эффект наложения тайного действа на…
❤18custom 52650681317636357858custom 53954514203359491407
🐬Духи воды — проказники и морочники, просить у них помощи — дело десятое. А вот помочь сопроводить за границу среднего мира — это всегда пожалуйста. На фото мое любимое место в ивовых корнях: тут я молюсь, медитирую, общаюсь со своими Богами и Духами🐬
❤23custom 535082621191430044915custom 53954514203359491406
Выражение «в магию идут не от хорошей жизни» стало уже практически крылатым, и в целом-то оно так, но давайте маленько углубимся Лично меня не устраивает, что данная фраза дает флаг в руки тем людям, которые через практику хотят разобраться со своим неуспехом. Наколдовать себе деньжонок, бабенок/мужичков, здоровья, красоты, молодости и далее по пирамиде Маслоу. Впрочем, такой подход имеет место быть, и таким товарищ…
custom 535082621191430044918❤13custom 53954514203359491407
Магия и маркетинг. Почему прогревы, лид-магниты и трипвайеры не работают для практиков? Привет! Сегодня хочу обсудить с вами одну важную тему. В силу своей эротической привязанности к знаниям и обучению, каждый раз, когда я открываю для себя новое поле проявления, я тут же забираюсь в какой-нибудь курс или закрытый клуб по соответсвующей теме С маркетингом и СММ такое произошло около пяти лет назад, и за это время …
❤18custom 535082621191430044916custom 54517097194775042968custom 52650681317636357852
Меня нарисовали в образе жреца Инпу! Давайте полюбуемся вместе🧨🐈⬛️
❤29custom 545170971947750429618custom 526506813176363578511custom 53508262119143004493
8 Минут отвечаю на ваши вопросы заболевшим голосом🍓 Моя личка для ваших вопросов — @mascara98
custom 54517097194775042966custom 53508262119143004493
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @pernecher. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 789,080 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ROMAN GYPSY| Обитель Богов” (@pernecher), 420 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pernecher.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.