Channel
@performia_ua
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
539subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001479403360 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @performia_ua |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/performia_ua |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:21 | 539 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 538 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:36 | 540 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:49 | 537 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:57 | 537 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
66 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 23 | 34.8% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 33.3% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 21.2% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 9.09% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.52% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎉 Другий блок курсу «Повна технологія найму Перформії» позаду! Наша офлайн-група з 7 учасників знову зустрілася в Києві, щоб зробити ще один крок до того, щоб найм перестав бути лотереєю, а став прогнозованим процесом. Цього разу ми занурилися в один із найунікальніших інструментів Перформії - тести на особистісні якості. Протягом трьох днів ми детально розбирали: 🔹 які особистісні риси стоять за поведінкою людини…
🔥5❤2👏1
🚀 Стартували! Цими днями розпочалося офлайн-навчання на курсі «Повна технологія найму Перформії». За перші 3 дні учасники вже пройшли перший блок, отримали новий погляд на найм персоналу та набір практичних інструментів, які можна почати застосовувати одразу: інтерв'ю на продуктивність, перевірку мотивації та знань кандидатів, складання портрета кандидата і створення цільових оголошень. Попереду три тижні практики…
❤5👍1👏1
А ви б найняли на роботу самого себе?)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👏3👍2🤯1
Багато власників бізнесу, директорів та і в цілому продуктивних залучених керівників мріють про співробітника, який працював би так само, як вони. Але чи замислювалися ви, наскільки легко було б керувати самим собою? Висока продуктивність не скасовує складнощі характеру, принциповість, незалежність чи високі вимоги. Саме тому знайти і найняти людину з високою продуктивністю - це ще половина справи. Друга половина…
❤6🔥3👍2
А ви прихильник онлайн чи офлайн формату навчання?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍3❤2🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2👍2👏1
5 днів. 16 людей. І одна навичка, яка вирішує майже все. З 22 по 26 травня у Львові командою Перформії ми провели тренінг «Теорія і практика продуктивного спілкування». 16 людей з різних сфер бізнесу зібралися в одному залі, щоб прокачати навичку, від якої залежить усе: результати, стосунки, гроші, команда, життя. Перший день - потужна теоретична база від Олексія Самойленко. Формула спілкування, розкладена на атом…
🔥12❤6👍4
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @performia_ua. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А ви б найняли на роботу самого себе?)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
А ви прихильник онлайн чи офлайн формату навчання?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Перформія Україна. Люди — це головне!” (@performia_ua), 539 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/performia_ua.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.