Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for СУД

Channel

СУД

@pererehod0nik

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

4subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002522624152
TypeChannel
Username@pererehod0nik
Created30 June 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/pererehod0nik

Growth

454.57 August 2026 — 5 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5 subscribers28 August 2026 — 4 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 20 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4–5 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 01:124-1
13 Aug 2026, 01:165no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:585first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 30 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

182 reactions across 4 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53797650787845029057943.4%
custom 52445886711343621473820.9%
custom 53821314339659083022614.3%
custom 5348524830998150682105.49%
custom 531462272139554496373.85%
custom 627405851770801865963.30%
custom 540432298022852045652.75%
custom 544488066564228873652.75%
👀52.75%
10.549%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 182 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2025 to 20 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1,249
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 4 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
1,230
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pererehod0nik. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 5 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 June 2025 to 20 August 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2025, 11:01 UTC≈1,130 views20 reactions6 Starsread 13 August 2026

ЕДУ В ТАК НАЗЫВАЕМУЮ ОДЕССУ ТАК СКАЗАТЬ НА МОРЕ 🤌🏿🤌🏿🤌🏿

custom 52445886711343621478custom 53821314339659083026custom 53146227213955449632custom 54448806656422887362custom 53485248309981506821custom 62740585177080186591

16 Aug 2025, 00:02 UTC≈1,250 views20 reactions6 Starsread 13 August 2026

В ладони лабуба во рту хуй

custom 53797650787845029059custom 53146227213955449635custom 52445886711343621474custom 62740585177080186592

13 Aug 2025, 00:34 UTC≈1,170 views29 reactions7 Starsread 13 August 2026

табличка моих любимок🎀 @aoiminke — 1К ( ⭐️) @Fallouuu — 81 (⭐️) @samai_44 — 38 (⭐️) @IQ0_8 — 46 (⭐️) @samai_44 — 38 (⭐️) @evengodcandie — 15 (⭐️) @LipsiHaMi — 12,85 (⭐️) @ssgpFN — 7 (⭐️) @qwqeqw1 — 11 (⭐️) @vertyfv — 5 (⭐️) @Infesoria — 4 (⭐️ @Omori33 — 3 (⭐️) @wasdd — 1,7 (⭐️) @userscammer — 1 (⭐️) @gravitaciyadkdk — 1 (⭐️) @Lucien_ryo — 1 (⭐️) Те кто юзы меняет у вас семьи нет вы в память о ней меняете имена типо

custom 537976507878450290511custom 52445886711343621477custom 53485248309981506826custom 53821314339659083023custom 62740585177080186592

18 Jul 2025, 01:39 UTC≈1,540 views113 reactions1,230 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🧍‍♂️ name — ctomotolog | @ctoiviotolog 🧩 age — 16 🔑 chat information — https://t.me/+1JCYAYJkOes0ODFi Сделайте 50 на реакции «love»

custom 537976507878450290559custom 524458867113436214719custom 538213143396590830217👀5custom 54043229802285204565custom 53485248309981506823custom 544488066564228873631

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @pererehod0nik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“СУД” (@pererehod0nik), 4 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pererehod0nik.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.