Channel
@perceptron
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
256subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001096058246 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @perceptron |
| Description | Perceptron |
| Created | 21 November 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/perceptron |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 256 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 256 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 April 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 765 |
| Reactions total | 15 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 02:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
46 reactions across 14 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 41 | 89.1% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 10.9% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 April 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
И о войне. Текущая война в какой-то степени повторяет ПМВ. Но есть нюанс. Исход ПМВ в 1918 определился критической концентрацией бронетехники и штурмовой авиации на отдельном участке фронта и правильной их координацией - ни того, ни другого в принципе не было в первую половину ПМВ. Дроновая война это действительно аналог окопной войны 1915-17 - несмотря на то, что в дроновую Вторая украинская война превратилась тольк…
👎1
Предвестникам апокалипсиса. Даже если спалить весь WB и спасти его деньгами ЦБ в размере 1.3 трл. р., то в сравнении с ВВП это 0.6%. Даже если до кучи спалить еще Озон, а сверху еще Яндекс.Маркет и остальную мелочь, то выйдет на круг максимум 1.3% ВВП. Очень страшно
А также про умное голосование. Если бы НЛ имели шансы получить, скажем, 60% по спискам, они бы заработали 135 мандатов и, таким образом, лишили бы заведомо ЕР конституционного большинства, даже если бы ЕР получило 90 мандатов по спискам и 210 мандатов по одномандатным округам. И тогда самые одиозные законы узурпатора не прошли бы. То есть, НЛ обрели бы полезную функцию какого-никакого ассенизатора кремлевского говна.…
👍6
А также напомню, что началом португальской экспансии и вообще эпохи Великих географических открытий являлся захват Сеуты в 1415, отбитой у Бен Салаха из берберской династии Ваттасидов. Сегодняшний захват Сеуты, очевидно, эту эпоху завершает
👍1
Я вот что думаю. Замочат не только Телеграм. Когда MAX окончательно похоронит надежду на перехват независимого трафика, проект Кириенко сольют, и превратят Госуслуги в настоящего медиа-монополиста. Всё будет только там. Ничего придумывать не надо. Хочешь общаться? Сдай свои данные ФСБ, ФНС и Росреестру и общайся на здоровье
Улыбает прогрессивная общественность, которая гневается от роликов микробизнесменов про горящие коммерческие склады. Дескать, не призывают банду Путина под суд и не посыпают голову пеплом за Бучу, не видят, видите ли, причинно-следственных связей, чурбаны неотесанные, так их, чтоб поняли, наконец, торжество коллективной ответственности. Я что-то не видел ни одного оппозиционера со сгоревшим от дроновых бомбежек склад…
👍5👎2
Прошел месяц с того, как я написал пост о реальной возможности поставить узурпатора перед дилеммой "Крым или Донбасс" путем взятия Крыма в полную блокаду. Что сделано? Нихуя не сделано. Вместо концентрации на супер-стратегической боевой задаче, решаемость которой ВПОЛНЕ осуществима, товарищ Зеленский продолжил пулять по НПЗ и собирать лайки от картонных соросят. Которые внезапно взяли и предали, устроив майданчик про…
Умер республиканский ястреб сенатор Линдси Грэм. Воинствующий заукраинец, тот, кто обещал заработать много денег на падении режима аятолл. Короче, бесполезный идиот. Почему так? Напомню, обескровливание узурпатора это комплекс "эмбарго на основной экспорт из страны агрессора + благоприятствование любому импорту в страну кроме прямых военных поставок + благоприятствование импорту любого капитала и любого труда из стра…
👍2👎1
Армянское радио спрашивают: - Будут ли при коммунизме выездные визы? Армянское радио отвечает: - Югославские ревизионисты утверждают, что будут. Китайские маоисты объясняют, что нет. Мы же, подходим к вопросу диалектически: у кого-то будут, у кого-то нет
👍2
Silver clouds, Khimki, 20:24 UTC
👍6
Сегодня пока мы ждем итогов съездов основных партий, самое время глянуть медленным просмотром мою дискуссию с Валерием Николаевичем Бакуниным - моим старшим и старым товарищем, много лет возглавлявшим в Московской области сначала Яблоко, затем СПС, затем Солидарность и Демвыбор. Бакунин можно сказать, патриарх региональной политики, успешный предприниматель, сейчас по понятным причинам эмигрировал из России, но не ут…
👍1
Товарищ Зеленский за всем этим дымовым эффектом от потешных бомбежек НПЗ таки нашел слабое место узурпатора, и очень больное место, Если Крым удастся миддлстрайками и морскими дронами взять в настоящую блокаду, очень скоро 120-тысячной Крымской группировке, отрезанной от снабжения, ничего не останется, как совершить новый Дюнкерк. Три года назад это не удалось сделать танками, а теперь может получиться дронами. И тог…
👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @perceptron. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,443,621 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Perceptron” (@perceptron), 256 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/perceptron.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.