Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Choose Rich情绪投机和投研之路

@pepethinking

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

312subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001786956405
TypeChannel
Username@pepethinking
DescriptionSharing my thoughts and insider infos on crypto alphas helping u lose less and earn more @pepethinkers Channel owner/欢迎交流 @godpepe2023
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/pepethinking

Growth

3127 Aug 2026, 09:25 — 312 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 07:35 — 312 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 09:258 Aug 2026, 07:35
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 311–313 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 07:35312no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:25312first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
362
Videos
32
Links
225

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
4m 26s
Average length
1m 29s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 2 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍250.0%
125.0%
🔥125.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2026 to 11 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 May 2026, 11:22 UTC147 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

清楚你的货要卖给谁。 大多数人无法想清楚这件事。 在我看来,他是这个世界上所有利润的核心来源。 你在链上交易,动作拆分是这样的:买入代币,然后等待卖出。 实际上和商业行为一模一样。亦或者和世界上所有的行为其实都一样。 比如你开了一家公司,不论是什么类型的公司。 你买入了物品(可以是正在训练的人员、等待加工的材料、正在完善的互联网产品,等等),等待卖出(成熟的服务、加工完备的产品、完善的应用,等等) 这里有一个问题,我们是来攫取利润的。那么你的利润该如何产生? 直击本质,就是要卖给谁的问题。 你是卖服务的公司?那你应该卖给那些对特定服务有一定要求的人,想清楚他们会需要什么,对什么感兴趣,会对什么样的服务卖单。 你是互联网公司?比如你的APP是例如X和ins这样的大众社媒。(你可能会认为,你要尽力迎合的人群应该是用户群体。) 但从利润角度来考量,逻辑不太对。再想清楚点,你要卖给的人应该是广告商而不是用户。你的用户群

🔥1

16 May 2026, 09:22 UTC120 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @cryptoyeezuscallsVideo

Video, posted without a caption

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pepethinking. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Choose Rich情绪投机和投研之路” (@pepethinking), 312 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pepethinking.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.