Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for People's Review

Channel

People's Review

@peoplesreview

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

41subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001197777635
TypeChannel
Username@peoplesreview
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 October 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 11 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/peoplesreview

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

414241.57 August 2026 — 42 subscribers10 August 2026 — 42 subscribers16 September 2026 — 41 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 40 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41–42 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 15:4141-1
10 Aug 2026, 17:3142no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:5742first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

27 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1037.0%
👏829.6%
❤414.8%
💯414.8%
🔥13.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 January 2024 to 16 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 May 2026, 06:22 UTC13 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

The left forces in West Bengal remains sceptic about Mamata Bandopadhyay, avoiding her call to join a broader anti-BJP coalition. https://www.peoplesreview.in/politics/2026/05/mamatas-unity-call-against-bjp-meets-left-scepticism-in-west-bengal/

👏1

10 May 2026, 13:27 UTC16 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Mamata Banerjee’s call for a broad anti-BJP opposition platform after losing power in Bengal raises a deeper political question: Is this really about resisting BJP — or surviving political irrelevance? https://www.peoplesreview.in/politics/2026/05/mamatas-politics-behind-anti-bjp-platform-in-west-bengal-after-tmcs-defeat/

👏1

11 Mar 2025, 09:36 UTC56 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

At a time when corporate honchos share their work-life balance tips on LinkedIn, Bengaluru's technology workers have to struggle against repressive corporates and a hostile government demanding their right to disconnect, to have work-life balance. Read more here 👇🏾 https://www.peoplesreview.in/india/rights/2025/03/it-workers-rally-for-right-to-disconnect/

👏1

8 Mar 2025, 10:28 UTC54 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

India's working women don't have much to celebrate on International Working Women's Day but to gain basic recognition as workers. https://www.peoplesreview.in/women/2025/03/wage-labour-gender-indias-working-womens-struggle-for-recognition/

❤2

5 Feb 2025, 08:29 UTC44 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Did Modi’s reference to Riedel’s JFK’s Forgotten Crisis backfire? While attacking Nehru, he may have drawn attention to uncomfortable parallels in his own foreign policy. https://www.peoplesreview.in/analysis-en/2025/02/modi-nehru-and-riedels-jfks-forgotten-crisis-a-bitter-irony/

🔥1

4 Feb 2025, 10:07 UTC32 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Here is a déjà vu for the Muslims of Delhi as the Indian capital prepares to vote tomorrow. #DelhiElections2025 #DelhiElection2025 #DelhiAssemblyElections2025 #DelhiPolls #Kejriwal #AAP #pogrom #BJP https://www.peoplesreview.in/politics/2025/02/history-repeats-itself-delhi-assembly-election-2025-under-2020s-shadow/

👏1

11 Nov 2024, 09:31 UTC37 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

What's left of the left in the US? https://www.peoplesreview.in/foreign-affairs/2024/11/us-presidential-elections-and-the-lost-cause-of-the-american-left/

👍3

2 Nov 2024, 07:19 UTC69 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Yes, Ayodhya set a world record with Diwali lamps, but who paid for it? https://www.peoplesreview.in/economy/2024/11/gold-of-others-help-uttar-pradesh-glitter-during-diwali/

👍2

12 May 2024, 07:09 UTC70 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

#Modi's poverty https://www.peoplesreview.in/politics/2024/05/how-poor-is-modi-whats-inside-his-zero-asset-claim/

❤1

25 Apr 2024, 05:37 UTC84 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Do you think Narendra Modi has lost confidence in his "Modi Ki Guarantee" and therefore returning to his original, Islamophobic avatar? What do you think? Read this 👇and share your views by commenting. https://www.peoplesreview.in/politics/2024/04/modis-islamophobic-rhetoric-puts-guarantees-in-backseat/

💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @peoplesreview. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“People's Review” (@peoplesreview), 41 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/peoplesreview.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.