1000002215 (679×960)

Channel
Il Pensiero Attivo 2.0
@pensieroattivo2
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
160subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001183239608 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pensieroattivo2 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pensieroattivo2 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 160 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:01 | 161 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:22 | 161 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 26 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2h 37m
- Average length
- 22m 30s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 7 | 77.8% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 11.1% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 January 2024 to 9 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Già detto, ma ripetere, a quanto pare, è un esercizio obbligato. Se andate a votare alle comunali e verbalizzate il rifiuto della scheda delle europee vi conteggiano ugualmente come votanti per le europee. Questa è una vecchia trappola dei falsi controinformatori che cercano di far salire l'affluenza in questo modo.
Video, posted without a caption
La senatrice statunitense Elizabeth Warren parla di “molte prove” del genocidio israeliano a Gaza Se vogliono farlo secondo la legge, credo che scopriranno che si tratta di genocidio, e hanno molte prove per farlo. Middle East Monitor - Questa è la risposta della senatrice del Massachusetts, Elizabeth Warren, ad una domanda del pubblico durante un evento presso il Centro islamico di Boston a Wayland. Sebbene si si…
Speranza: «Sapevo che il 20 per cento degli effetti avversi era gravissimo» 🔗 https://www.laverita.info/speranza-vaccino-effetti-avversi-2667732780.html
Video subbato in italiano. Link alla notizia su haaretz (login -> [email protected]): https://t.ly/vlfbg Link al video su X: https://t.ly/WiF9R
𝗔𝗨𝗧𝗢 𝗘𝗟𝗘𝗧𝗧𝗥𝗜𝗖𝗔 𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗘𝗚𝗥𝗔𝗧𝗔 𝗔 𝗣𝗜𝗔𝗭𝗭𝗔 𝗣𝗨𝗟𝗜𝗧𝗔. 𝗤𝗨𝗔𝗟𝗖𝗢𝗦𝗔 𝗣𝗨𝗭𝗭𝗔 A Piazza Pulita su La7, una delle tante trasmissioni strutturate per i subumani, hanno mandato in onda un servizio che smonta le auto elettriche, facendole uscire come dei bidoni con le ruote, evidenziando criticità da tutti i punti di vista (energetico, ecologico e dei consumi). Tutto corretto e sacrosanto, ma la domanda che sorge spontanea è come mai una d…
UNA LEZIONE INDIMENTICABILE. Dal mio archivio, un estratto di un intervento di qualche anno fa in cui racconto uno degli aneddoti più significativi della mia vita. La lezione che tutti vorrebbero ricevere per affrontare la vita con la consapevolezza che un altro mondo è possibile... buona visione! Per chi fosse interessato a vedere il video integrale potete trovarlo qui: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oM_0vBb32sk&…
❤1
Non lo chiedo mai per i miei video o per i miei contenuti in generale,ma questa volta si…diffondete questo video più che potere è una questione che mi ha personalmente fatta incazzare : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YS-EGLLtQZc&feature=youtu.be
Su Twitter intanto abbiamo chiesto all'ambasciata britannica perché il governo inglese accusa la Russia quando Navalny, Skripal e Litvinenko erano tutti gestiti e pagati dall'MI6. In questo video, vediamo che uno dei collaboratori di Navalny, Vladimir Ashurkov, chiede dai 10 ai 20 milioni di dollari all'anno ai servizi inglesi per iniziare una rivoluzione colorata contro Putin.
👏1
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pensieroattivo2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Il Pensiero Attivo 2.0” (@pensieroattivo2), 160 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pensieroattivo2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.