میدانید؟ من سر خود معطلم به قول امیر یا به نحو حرص در بیاری خودشیفته ام به قول لوبیا یا دم دستی نیستم، مغرورم و... به قول دیگران؛ اما نه. من فقط میخواهم مورد وقع نهاده شوم چون فکر میکنم، وقع مینهم... اگر بر من رسید کسی و گذر کرد به سرعتِ قبلی، «من» را ندیده؛ یک آنْ واحد مکانی/زمانی از خلاء را دیده. در دنیای شناگران، من به دنبال غواصهام... @pendaarhum

Channel
پندار؛
@pendaarhum
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
68subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001459958333 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pendaarhum |
| Description | پندار؟ بله؛ penدار ام؛ مینویسم... وقع بنه! روزدرّهواره | کَلافگشایی نهانگویی: ربات: t.me/pendaarhumbot ناشناس: https://telegram.me/BiChatBot?start=sc-216124-m24anb3 [email protected] |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pendaarhum |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 68 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 68 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 7 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 53.7%
- avg views ÷ 68 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 36.5
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (7 February 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 146 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 01:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 197
- Videos
- 30
- Links
- 27
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Posted without readable text
این پیام رو فوروارد کنید تصورم از اتاقتون رو بسازم
خسته از عبادت عبید فراری از عبادت تجار در حسرتِ عبادت احرار عاصیِ شرمندهی چشم به راه... @pendaarhum
صبح ۶:۰۰ وارد تهران شدم، ۸:۰۰ به چهارراه طالقانی رسیدم، ۱۰:۰۰ از چهارراه ولیعصر بیرون زدم و ۱۲:۳۰ تازه از تهران بیرون زدم. روایات ریز بماند، فقط همین را بگویم که من که آدم پیاده روی ام، اما باورمان نمیشود که هنوز صبح بوده؛ انتظار داشتیم ساعت پنج عصر باشد... رونوشت به آنها که میگویند کسی برای نان تن به این ماجرا میدهد
من نمیتوانم قبول کنم #او نیست. اما قبول کرده ام #او نیست. من از درون دو تکه شده ام... #موقت
به او خیره شده بود که برای از بین بردن وسواسهای کوچک ناشی از اضطراب میهمان نصف شبی تشییع فردا، دورش میپلکید. ناگهان از ذهنش گذشت: «شاید زندگی همان لحظهها باشد؛ تلاقی عقیده با عادتهای زنانه» آری زندگی، او بود... تلاقی عقیده با عادتهای زنانه... @pendaarhum
اگر نمیدانستم خدایی هست، برای ایران جان میدادم چرا که خانه است حال که میدانم خدایی هست، برای ایران جان میدهم چرا که خانهی خداست... @pendaarhum
محفل ققنوس نیز... @pendaarhum
آیا مومنها همه باید یک جور باشند؟ @pendaarhum
تاریخ یک حلقه است! میگویند در رشتهای به نام فلسفهی تاریخ، بحثی وجود دارد در این رابطه که تاریخ خطی است یا حلقهای؟ تکرار میشود یا میرود که رفته و دیگر باز نمیگردد... بیشتر مدرنها تاریخ را خطی میدانند حتی برخی از آنها ایندوره را بلوغ بشر دانسته و آن اولها را دوران کودکیاش. این معروف است همه شنیدیمش قصد طولانی کردن ندارم. حالش را هم. هر ساله روز عاشورا که میرسد در این ساعتها، به یقین میرسم که بشر جایی ب…
پ.ن: خشم روز (خشم شب سفید) به نظرم مصداق کمال در یک اژدهای زن است و لوبیا در انسانش... #موقت
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @pendaarhum. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 733,032 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“پندار؛” (@pendaarhum), 68 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pendaarhum.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.