Channel
@pelevin_vibe
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002666822383 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pelevin_vibe |
| Description | Две цитаты в день https://t.me/quotesvibe |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pelevin_vibe |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 4 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:32 | 4 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 63 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ✍ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
На деле мужчины и женщины гораздо дельше друг от друга, чем могут себе представить. Это даже трудно объяснить, насколько они непохожи. Дело здесь, конечно, в гормональном составе красной жидкости.Можно сказать, что наш мир населяют два вида наркаманов, которые принимают сильнейшие психотропы с очень разным действием. Они видят диаметрально противоположные галлюцинации, но должны проводить время рядом друг с другом. П…
Откровение любой глубины и ширины неизбежно упрется в слова. А слова неизбежно упрутся в себя. Виктор Пелевин. Generation «П»
✍1
К турбазе шли молча – здесь совсем по-другому дышалось и думалось. Как обычно, каждый давал себе слово переехать когда-нибудь жить в горы, покончив с липкой городской сажей навсегда – а для этого, зажмурившись покрепче, по возвращении в Москву вонзиться в сажу так глубоко и безжалостно, так эффективно и метко, что после этого последнего окончательного погружения… и т. д., и т. п.Мысль была обычной для гор и одинаково…
В душе я, конечно, испытывал омерзение к государству, невнятные, но грозные требования которого заставляли любую, даже на несколько секунд возникающую группу людей старательно подражать самому похабному из ее членов, - но, поняв, что мира и свободы на земле не достичь, духом я устремился ввысь, и все, чего потребовал выбранный мною путь, уже не вступало ни в какие противоречия с моей совест…
Слова, предназначенные для одного человека, ничего не дадут другому. Виктор Пелевин. t
✍1
Так уж работает наш ум – он обращается сам к себе за доказательствами подлинности своих переживаний и тут же достает их из широких штанин, забывая, что ни ног, ни тем более штанов у него нет. Виктор Пелевин. Путешествие в Элевсин
Если ты по-настоящему безразличен, никто из тех, кто может причинить тебе зло, про тебя просто не вспомнит и не подумает. Виктор Пелевин. Чапаев и Пустота
Тут сквозняк, каждый волос в зачесе дрожать должен. Меньше ресурсов будет для разговора. – Я говорю, сними, – улыбнулась она. – Меньше будешь пиз*дить, не страшно. Виктор Пелевин. iPhuck 10
Всем хорошо известно, что за любой кровью в наше время стоят чьи-то деньги. Виктор Пелевин. Папахи на башнях
Ценность книги определяетсяне тем, сколько человек ее прочтет. Гениальность "Джоконды" не зависит от того, сколько посетителей пройдет мимо нее за год. У величайших книг мало читателей, потому что их чтение требует усилия. Но именно из этого усилия и рождается эстетический эффект. Виктор Пелевин. Священная книга оборотня
Что такое человеческая цивилизация? Это не что иное, как огромное производство денег. Человеческие города - просто денежные фабрики, и только по этой причине в них живет такая уйма людей. Виктор Пелевин. Empire "V"
Перед тем как покинуть какой-либо мир, надо обобщить опыт своего пребывания в нем, а затем уничтожить все свои следы. Это традиция. Виктор Пелевин. Затворник и Шестипалый
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pelevin_vibe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,280,875 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пелевин vibe” (@pelevin_vibe), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pelevin_vibe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.