Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Peazemaking

@peazemaking

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

186subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001666885396
TypeChannel
Username@peazemaking
DescriptionStreet Art and Urban Interventions
Created28 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/peazemaking

Growth

1867 Aug 2026, 19:57 — 186 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 12:15 — 186 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:578 Aug 2026, 12:15
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 185–187 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 12:15186no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:57186first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 24 December 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
379
Videos
5
Links
48

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 39s
Average length
2m 39s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

86 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3338.4%
👍1517.4%
😢1112.8%
910.5%
🤡78.14%
😱55.81%
👏33.49%
🤔22.33%
🤬11.16%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 24 December 2022 to 10 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Jun 2025, 02:18 UTC165 viewsread 8 August 2026

Главный прошмандовец русского стрит-арта, Виктор Zабуга, после обвинений в насилии, не нашёл ничего лучшего как отправиться на фронт

10 Jun 2025, 02:18 UTC162 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @zimnArchiveVideo

суууууук.. "..а когда началась сво ЛИНЗА понял, что не может просто сидеть на диване, и ему не по пути с богемой"..ух бля, жирно. простите, пожалуйста. ну теперь по логике, в каком-нибудь центре вознесенского под чутким кураторством дугиносына должна быть выставка про то, какое уличное искусство войны нам на самом деле нужно. (только "мастерство и академическую выправку" надо немного будет подкачать) **там еще внеза

🤡7

12 Mar 2024, 09:11 UTC367 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @varlamov_news

Массовые обыски проходят у художников в разных регионах России, вероятно, это связано с делом бывшего издателя «Медиазоны» Петра Верзилова о госизмене, пишут «Сетевые свободы»: • В Петербурге сотрудники ФСБ пришли к художнику Катрин Ненашевой и музыканту Наталье Четверио, также обыск проходит у участников арт-группы «Явь». • В Москве силовики пришли к знакомой художника Philippenzo и увезли ее из квартиры, связи с

😱5🤬1

10 May 2023, 09:02 UTC488 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @publicsociologylaboratory

СМИРИТЬСЯ С НЕИЗБЕЖНОСТЬЮ: АНАЛИТИЧЕСКИЙ ОТЧЕТ ПРО ПОДДЕРЖКУ ВОЙНЫ В РОССИИ Ну что же, мы сами с трудом верим, но этот момент настал — мы снова представляем результаты полугодового труда нашей команды. Перед вами аналитический отчет по результатам качественного социологического исследования восприятия войны в Украине россиянами. Этот отчет – попытка разгадать загадку поддержки войны в современном российском обществе

👏2

10 May 2023, 08:43 UTC397 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Прошлогоднее. И, к сожалению, всё так же актуальное.

👍9😢2👏1

24 Feb 2023, 18:22 UTC500 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Российское посольство, Лондон

👍5🔥5

23 Feb 2023, 08:07 UTC452 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @paperpaper_ruPhoto

«Жизнеметр» — новая работа арт-группы «Явь» Работа сделана на основе методики Ивана Блиоха, по которой можно вычислить среднюю продолжительность жизни военного исходя из его роста и принадлежности к роду войск. Фото: @yav_zone

🔥4

14 Feb 2023, 13:05 UTC593 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Антик Данов Крым, 2023 Подробнее о серии в интервью с художником: https://arterritory.com/ru/vizualnoe_iskusstvo/sut_dnja_qa/26519-intervencija_v_krymu

9🤔2

31 Jan 2023, 14:50 UTC502 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥12😢2👍1

26 Dec 2022, 07:22 UTC544 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Знание — сила. Мичуринский проспект, Москва

😢7🔥3

24 Dec 2022, 18:49 UTC≈1,310 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Україна, фото: andrey_rachinskiy

🔥9

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @peazemaking. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Peazemaking” (@peazemaking), 186 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/peazemaking.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.