947vr15dkSbHd6StBraR6wK7tddkvJUfeZCxtPHJW5kF $MAGA is a good narrative How about book of MAGA? This could be a good run

Channel
Peaky's Gems Call
@peakygemcall
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
192subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001737517060 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @peakygemcall |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/peakygemcall |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:06 | 192 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 193 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 March 2024 to 16 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Di7zYTEbE2o9onDUVZevDeGevqXg44vpR1SibQMJeBiC Make a call on this at this fking entry
2x from my call and now sitting at a good entry if this could break ATH for another 5x or 10x
https://t.me/nakahobo https://twitter.com/nakahobo https://www.satooshinakahobo.com/ This could be another $BTC on SOL chain Look howw $BTC on $ETH could go, now its $SOL time for $BTC parody
BQTAjCpcL8cZjwih2FerdbBLQT7TLSWXZgnnBhRA1ey3 $BTC sitting at a good entry for 10M$ marrketcap Saw many Influencers shilling this and printing hard af
Gm gm Ready for gamling on $SOL chain today? 😎😎😎 Go away for a several time cause some issues of my main job but everything is okay so now Im back for some Xs 🔜🔜🔜
❤1
6JPGTCcn8s4ATp5hryphSQHNBApgEPLb36Ww1oA9Yx2W $SHEB Sheba Inhu is good parody with $SHIB I think this could be a good entry
Called thiss $BEST in my private from 40k and noww sitting at 160k and ready to send more
2TmT13uRZNrEhiG5sj5F6Z7HyU31xWkmyAzz5SvigDNb Aped this old play $HIDLER
Photo, posted without a caption
AABjZv796Nc4YuEXxMrPb7cWzBpJw2vkc8mNTN2QC933 $SMITH Good vol here LP lock but I dont see their social Take risk and do a gamble here
ansrqXznWXjQZWq5189Y82Ht9BXR5qGArY5UA2wD3Eb Dont know what this is but sound like Ansem a Twitter Threador with bull case af with this market CA clean and now ready to send
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @peakygemcall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,443,796 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@peakygemcall named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Peaky's Gems Call” (@peakygemcall), 192 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/peakygemcall.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.