Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Крокс

Channel

Крокс

@peach_crocs

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002703907242
TypeChannel
Username@peach_crocs
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/peach_crocs

Growth

1011 Aug 2026, 09:16 — 10 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 10:18 — 10 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 09:1612 Aug 2026, 10:18
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9–11 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 10:1810no change
11 Aug 2026, 09:1610first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 7 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
31
Videos
3
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

64 reactions across 7 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54251132461661725591320.3%
🍓1320.3%
custom 52988355812566192411218.8%
custom 54386527611996195521015.6%
custom 547440025933554917446.25%
custom 542691255829031842534.69%
🤩34.69%
custom 521759521399585625523.13%
custom 543846112834880767823.13%
11.56%
🥴11.56%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 7 November 2025 to 3 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Dec 2025, 16:06 UTC74 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Опа! Неожиданная коллаба😏 #рисуночек

🍓3custom 54251132461661725592custom 54384611283488076782custom 543865276119961955221

15 Nov 2025, 11:20 UTC83 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Господи, прости, весь день ушёл на ЭТО.. 😶 ОСТРОЖНО, 16+! #рисуночек #тикток

custom 54386527611996195524custom 52988355812566192413🍓2custom 54251132461661725591custom 54744002593355491741

13 Nov 2025, 15:05 UTC61 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Раскрасил с подругой🥺 #рисуночек

🤩3🍓2custom 52988355812566192412custom 54251132461661725591custom 54386527611996195521

8 Nov 2025, 11:36 UTC66 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

А ещё вот такая тётя😳 #рисуночек

🍓3custom 54744002593355491743custom 54251132461661725592🥴1

8 Nov 2025, 11:35 UTC50 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Что-то вроде полноценки..в голове выглядело лучше🙂 #рисуночек

custom 52988355812566192413custom 54269125582903184253custom 54251132461661725592🍓1

7 Nov 2025, 13:35 UTC49 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52988355812566192413custom 54251132461661725593custom 54386527611996195523🍓1

7 Nov 2025, 13:35 UTC43 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Раскадровка на всякий случай😎

custom 52175952139958562552custom 54251132461661725592🍓1custom 52988355812566192411

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @peach_crocs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,324,567 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Крокс” (@peach_crocs), 10 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/peach_crocs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.