Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

price chart

@pchartt

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

80subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001722184998
TypeChannel
Username@pchartt
Descriptionизи @pr1cechart
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/pchartt

Growth

807 August 2026 — 80 subscribers9 August 2026 — 80 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 79–81 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 19:0280no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:2080first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 November 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
123
Videos
3
Links
540

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

30 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1860.0%
😁930.0%
custom 604647869759304816613.33%
❤‍🔥13.33%
🤡13.33%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 November 2024 to 18 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Jan 2025, 14:54 UTC901 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Прикольная история с Трампом, еще более прикольно было смотреть с хлопцами как он растет. Вообще не ебу почему я не купил, какой то нормальной причины нету, да и читал что у многих также. И ебанату понятно насколько это глобально, а мы сидели и еблом щелкали пока он рос. Удалось чет заработать на дампе щитков, но я все равно пиздец как не рад. Гц тех кто профитнул. Фомо имеется, но как бы и хуй с ним, ибо цикл на сол

👍6

17 Jan 2025, 20:16 UTC704 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Коллы пока не даю если вы не заметили

😁2

17 Jan 2025, 19:51 UTC231 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @donqshitpost

https://t.me/kittyverse_ai_bot/play?startapp=u737571357 у кого тг ферма — прокрутите по рефке своей и отбейте её немножко. 0.3$ за рефа

31 Dec 2024, 19:38 UTC500 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

С наступающим ребята

👍4❤‍🔥1

11 Dec 2024, 18:56 UTC458 viewsread 9 August 2026

И почему люди такой нарратив не выкупают???

11 Dec 2024, 18:49 UTC423 viewsread 9 August 2026

https://dexscreener.com/solana/bnmht4ddi2fox8v6dufsk9d7bbnxwby4r8cqfqqmxe2r Все же слышали про бабу которая поеблась со 100 мужиками за день. Так вот теперь хочет с 1000 и это может расхайпиться еще больше. Гембл диор

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pchartt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“price chart” (@pchartt), 80 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pchartt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.