Channel
@pbu_consulting
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
187subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001718373655 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pbu_consulting |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pbu_consulting |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:05 | 187 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 187 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 27 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (27 January 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 95 |
| Reactions total | 15 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
90 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 33 | 36.7% | |
| 🔥 | 31 | 34.4% | |
| 🤯 | 7 | 7.78% | |
| 💔 | 5 | 5.56% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 3.33% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 3.33% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 2.22% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 2.22% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 1.11% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.11% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.11% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.11% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Продолжаю разбирать «Однажды в Ирландии» с точки зрения управления. Сильная команда может состоять из очень разных людей. Иногда настолько разных, что добровольно за один стол они бы не сели 😂 Бойл и Эверетт практически противоположны. Один знает, как здесь всё устроено на самом деле. Другой знает, как должна работать система. Бойл действует по ситуации, импровизирует и легко нарушает правила. Эверетт планирует, …
❤1👍1💯1
Надеюсь, все, кто хотел, уже посмотрели «Однажды в Ирландии». Дальше — спойлеры. Итак, вернемся к управлению. В фильме сталкиваются две очень разные профессиональные культуры. Агент ФБР Эверетт — действительно крутой профессионал: системный, подготовленный, с понятным планом большой операции. Инструкции, презентация, распределение ролей, межведомственное взаимодействие — всё на месте. Но есть одна маленькая непри…
❤4👍1🔥1
Какой я вчера фильм чудесный посмотрела. 2011 год, но я все пропустила Однажды в Ирландии (The Guard) - черная криминальная комедия с хорошей долей абсурда и безграничного стеба 🥰 Кто как я пропустил, обязательно посмотрите
❤3🔥3
Вот я все про менеджмент, про управление, о том что нельзя делать своими ручками, надо делегировать... Но как же приятно самой работу работать) Вот вчера анализировала арбитражную практику по своему региону. Прямо как лучший детективный сериал посмотрела - в нем и страсти, и интрига, и основано на реальных событиях, и многое осталось за кадром, и за всем стоит политика ... Как же любим мы сами (манагеры, выросшие…
❤5
Пусть будет так)
🔥6💘2
Сегодня было так
❤5
С днем предпринимателя! И хоть многие мои знакомые предприниматели не пьют и активно занимаются спортом, мой бокал-за вас/нас- -кто не боится рисковать - кто отвечает не только за себя, но и за сотрудников и клиентов -кто хочет изменить мир к лучшему -у кого хорошо развита интуиция -кто балансирует и выплывает в сложных ситуациях -кто почти никогда не опускает руки -кто видит возможности в самых сложных ситуациях -…
❤6
Иногда достаточно просто смотреть в окно и ничего не решать
Сегодня с мамой говорили об упущенных возможностях. Разве стоит о них сожалеть? Если фокусироваться на чем то, то возможности проплывают мимо. Если не фокусироваться, то вообще ничего не добьешься. Как-то так. Всем хорошего вечера. День космонавтики - мысли о пределе, возможностях и шансе 🚀
❤2👍1🔥1
Еще недавно я думала, что меня как бухгалтера скоро заменит ИИ, но пока все идет к тому, что это будет бабушка со счетами 😭
🔥5🤔2🤯1😁1😢1
Сто лет ничего не советовала — ни фильмы, ни сериалы. Да и вообще пишу я тут, как видите, нечасто 😄 Но тут — не удержалась. Он такой… забавный, легкий, красивый, очень про любовь, что не могу не поделиться. Идеально, чтобы разгрузиться. Осторожно, захватывает. Вчера не доспала на две лишних серии 😂 Сериал: «Компаньонки» И очень про менеджмент: когда стараешься все контролировать, а все идет, как идет, но в цело…
🔥4❤3
Весна проявляется штрихами. Подогрев сиденья в машине. Но это не кнопка — это солнце. Проулок, по которому каждый день еду на работу, оказался вполне широкой дорогой. Зимой его держали в тисках сугробы. Весна проявляется большими пространствами. В тени снежные горы выше человека, а на солнечных улицах сухой асфальт. Вчера вовлеклась в игру поиска весны в городе, нашла цветы
🔥4❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @pbu_consulting. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,237,637 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Управление в малом бизнесе с Еленой Шипиловой” (@pbu_consulting), 187 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pbu_consulting.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.