Channel
@paywithpi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
535subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001068560870 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @paywithpi |
| Created | Between 1 April 2016 and 30 April 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/paywithpi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 535 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:19 | 540 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:30 | 540 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (5 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 291 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
💣خبر مهم برای جامعه Pi Network بنیاد Fabric Foundation بهصورت رسمی اعلام کرد که Pi Network به عنوان شریک پرداخت پروژه RoboPay انتخاب شده است. در این همکاری، Pi به عنوان ارز پرداخت خدمات رباتها در سراسر شبکه Fabric مورد استفاده قرار خواهد گرفت. 🤖 RoboPay بستری است که به عاملهای هوش مصنوعی اجازه میدهد رباتها را بهصورت خودکار پیدا کنند، استخدام کنند، مأموریت بدهند و هزینه خدمات آنها را بهصورت درونزنجیرهای پردا…
Photo, posted without a caption
🔷مهاجرت انتقال پای های استخراج شده به کیف پول از سر گرفته شده است! در بلاکچین پای، هر چند ثانیه یکبار عملیات create_claimable_balance اجرا میشود. سیگنال واضحی مبنی بر اینکه موتور مهاجرت دوباره شروع به حرکت کرده است. ⬅️این به چه معناست: ▫️ حسابهای جدید ایجاد و تأمین مالی میشوند؛ شبکه دوباره در حال حرکت است. ▫️این الگو، موجهای مهاجرت قبلی را منعکس میکند؛ دستههای بزرگی از تراکنشهای create_claimable_balance اغ…
پیام اصلی تیم پای نتورک برای روز Pi2Da پای نتورک در حال حرکت از یک پروژه صرفاً مبتنی بر استخراج موبایلی به سمت ارائه زیرساختهایی در حوزه هوش مصنوعی، هویت دیجیتال و پردازش توزیعشده است؛ زیرساختهایی که میتوانند توسط توسعهدهندگان و کسبوکارهای خارج از اکوسیستم Pi نیز مورد استفاده قرار گیرند.
🚨 گزارش ویژه: آگوست پرخبر برای Pi Network؛ از رباتیک تا ارتقای فنی! 🚀⚡ 🟢 شبکه Pi در آستانه تغییرات بزرگی است. همکاری استراتژیک با RoboPay امکان استفاده از Pi برای خدمات رباتیک (مانند تحویل کالا یا بازرسی صنعتی) را فراهم میکند؛ تغییری بنیادین از «خرید ربات» به «خریدِ نتیجه». 📌 در بخش فنی، پس از تکمیل موفقیتآمیز پروتکل v25، ارتقای مهم v26 برای ۱۱ آگوست برنامهریزی شده است. اپراتورهای نود باید حتماً سیستم خود را تا …
Photo, posted without a caption
🚨 تحول بزرگ؛ همکاری Pi Network و RoboPay برای پرداخت خدمات رباتیک! 🤖🚀 🟢 شبکه Pi با RoboPay همکاری میکند تا درگاه پرداخت Pi را برای خدمات رباتیک در شبکه Fabric باز کند. این یعنی گامی عملی به سوی دنیای اقتصادِ خودکار که در آن ماشینها نقش فعال دارند. 📌 پلتفرم RoboPay به هوش مصنوعی اجازه میدهد تا رباتها را بهطور مستقل اجاره کند و هزینه آنها را روی بلاکچین بپردازد. اکنون این امکان برای میلیونها کاربر Pi فراهم می…
Photo, posted without a caption
🚨 آپدیت V27؛ آیا این آخرین گام تا «Mainnet» اصلی شبکه Pi است؟ 🚀 🟢 برخی گمانهزنی میکنند که نسخه V27 میتواند آخرین بهروزرسانی فنی پیش از ورود به فاز نهایی و اصلی Mainnet باشد. 📌 این خبر برای میلیونها کاربری که سالها در انتظار این نقطه عطف هستند، جذاب است. با این حال، مهم است بدانید که این موضوع فعلاً در حد تحلیلهای جامعه است و هیچ تأیید رسمی از سمت تیم هسته (Core Team) دریافت نشده است. • آپدیتهای فنی نظیر V…
Photo, posted without a caption
⚠️ قربانی هک ColdWallet جان خود را از دست داد. گزارشها حاکی از آن است که یکی از کاربران آسیبدیده از هک ColdWallet، پس از سرقت 6.4 BTC از داراییهایش، در اقدامی تلخ به زندگی خود پایان داده است. این کاربر در آخرین تلاش خود از هکر خواسته بود بیتکوینهایش را بازگرداند، اما طبق گزارشها اکنون فوتشده است. این حادثه بار دیگر اهمیت امنیت داراییهای دیجیتال و استفاده از روشهای امن نگهداری رمزارزها را یادآوری میکند.
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @paywithpi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 238,487 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“پای نتورک” (@paywithpi), 535 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/paywithpi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.