Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Pay Trioten

@paytrioten

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

112subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001424744997
TypeChannel
Username@paytrioten
Description💰 Carsten Jahn 💰 Der Volksbettler 💰 irgendwelche Lotzlöffel 💰 Carsten Jahn 💰 Hagen Prell 💰 Martin Sellner 💰 Carsten Jahn 💰 Timm Kellner 💰 Bettel Bodo 💰 Carsten Jahn 💰 Naomi Seibt 💰 Ignaz B.
Created26 December 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/paytrioten

Growth

1127 August 2026 — 112 subscribers9 August 2026 — 112 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 111–113 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 06:31112no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:41112first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 July 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
257
Videos
87
Links
513

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
11m 56s
Average length
1m 59s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

48 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1122.9%
🤣1122.9%
🤡1020.8%
👍816.7%
🔥36.25%
12.08%
12.08%
🙏12.08%
🤪12.08%
🤬12.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2024 to 1 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Jun 2026, 18:46 UTC10 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ukvaliVoice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

1 Jun 2026, 18:46 UTC31 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ukvaliVoice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

1 Jun 2026, 18:46 UTC40 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ukvaliVideo

Video, posted without a caption

29 Sept 2025, 21:50 UTC188 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

💰 Hagen Prell 🥖 Seit langem vermisst 🥐 Angeblich soll Hagen zurück gezogen in einer Garage leben. 🥚 Bitte ausreichend spenden um diese unzumutbaren Zustände für Hagen zu beenden. 🤡 @PayTrioten 🥖

🤡3

28 Aug 2025, 12:50 UTC176 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

💰 Timm Kellner 🥖 Bettelt subtil im Kohle wegen angeblich hoher Geldstrafe. 🍗 Was er nicht erzählt, der Beitrag ist nur wegen seiner Spendeneinnahmen so hoch geworden. 🍗 Eine Geldstrafe besteht aus Tagessätzen und der Höhe der Tagessätze. 🍞 Bei einer angenommen Verurteilung von 90 Tagessätzen wären das 122 Euro pro Tag. 🍞 Bei 30 Tagessätzen wären es 366 Euro am Tag. 🥩 Wir kennen die genauen Zahlen nicht aber re

😁4

26 Apr 2025, 22:28 UTC185 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @HolgerFischerRA

Die Berichterstattung der alternativen Presse zum Fall Füllmich nach der Urtelsverkündung ist in meinen Augen seltsam zurückhaltend und schonend. Eine Ausnnahme bildet hier seit langem Gordon Pankalla, der dafür gehörig Prügel bezog, weil so, wie die Mehrheit im Land nun mal der Regierung kritiklos hinterherläuft, andere unkritisch den Opponenten gegenüber sind. Bei Pankallas heutiger Rezension der Berichterstattung

24 Apr 2025, 09:40 UTC≈1,000 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

💰 Heinrich Fiechtner 🥖 Soll unqualifizieren Medienberichten nach, zu 70.000 Euro Geldstrafe verurteilt worden sein. 🥓 In Wirklichkeit wurde er scheinbar zu 485 Tagessätzen mit 150 Euro verurteilt. 🥓 Der genannte Betrag von 70.000 Euro ist soweit nicht richtig, weil es 485 x 150 = 72.750 Euro wären. 🥓 Die Verurteilung von 485 Tagessätzen entspricht einer Verurteilung von 1 Jahr und 4 Monaten umgerechnet in Geldst

😁41

19 Mar 2025, 22:10 UTC254 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

💰 Carsten Jahn 🥖 Stellt sich wieder dümmer als er ist. 🥖 Angeblich hat nicht er unliebsame Kommentare in seinem Chat gelöscht, sondern Zauberer Gandalf. 🤡 https://t.me/paytrioten/923 🍗 Normal intelligente Menschen hatten die Tatsache berücksichtigt, daß sie Admins im Chat einsetzen und diese Kommentare löschen. 🥓 Kleiner Tipp fürs nächste Mal Carsten, erst denken und dann auf Video Antwort verzichten. @PayTrio

1

19 Mar 2025, 22:06 UTC177 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @CarstenJahn_TEAMHEIMATVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

14 Feb 2025, 20:33 UTC235 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

In den endlosen Weiten des Internets, wo Social Media das Hirn zerfrisst, zieht ein Mann voller Hass und Unverstand durchs virtuelle Abendland. Hass und Hetze treiben ihn voran, mit ’ner Glatze wie ’ne Landebahn. Sein Name ist Carsten Jahn! @digitalePaYtrioten

👍3

14 Feb 2025, 20:09 UTC150 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @digitalePaYtriotenPhoto

⏩ TEILEN und @digitalePaYtrioten ABONNIEREN ⏪ 🔥 Eilmeldung: Carsten Jahn will Euer GELD‼️ 🤑 @digitalePaYtrioten

🤣2🤬1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @paytrioten. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pay Trioten” (@paytrioten), 112 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/paytrioten.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.