Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 40 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 536–551 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 12:55
538
-2
9 Sept 2026, 06:39
540
-2
22 Aug 2026, 20:08
542
-6
15 Aug 2026, 03:39
548
-1
8 Aug 2026, 12:04
549
+1
8 Aug 2026, 03:46
548
no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:19
548
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
281 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
100
35.6%
🔥
80
28.5%
❤
65
23.1%
🥰
20
7.12%
👏
16
5.69%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 281 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2024 to 17 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
一、二、三、四方支付(国际支付版)
一方支付:你用现金买了一串糖葫芦给商家。
二方支付:你花100元买了一件衣服,通过银行卡转账到卖家的银行账户。
三方支付:你用微信支付买了一串糖葫芦。三方支付公司需要有牌照,可以碰资金。
四方支付(聚合支付):你扫收钱吧的收款码,弹出来了各种支付方式,你选了微信支付付款10元,购买了一串糖葫芦。
四方支付(聚合支付公司)不能碰钱,这类公司是帮助三方支付公司提供支付服务。四方支付公司的出现很好理解,对于商家来说不用摆一堆码了,摆一个就行了。对于三方支付支付公司而言,一个一个商户的铺码,成本也挺高的,有聚合支付公司帮帮忙也挺好的。
说白了,聚合支付公司赚点微信和支付宝这类三方支付公司碗里漏的钱。
对应着做国际支付的时候的英文:
三方支付公司:A payment processor is an entity that handles the actual transfer of fu…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @payencyclopedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“支付百科🅥 @Payencyclopedia” (@payencyclopedia), 538 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/payencyclopedia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.