![Telegram profile photo for [REST]Павєл Шкібіді сігм або прост Паві🦕🥭](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/58/58d9020295accdae810f64fad179dda7c25435b76d9d2fcd6710ce29c788922d.jpg)
Channel
@pavelshkibidisigma228
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
108subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002572151632 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pavelshkibidisigma228 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pavelshkibidisigma228 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:48 | 108 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:05 | 111 | +1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:23 | 110 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 111 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 110 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
17 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5925047241852062715 | 8 | 47.1% | |
| custom 5926809926495112978 | 4 | 23.5% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 11.8% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 11.8% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 5.88% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚡️🔡🔡🔤🔡🔡🔡🔤🔤🔤🔡🔡⚡️ 🎞️🔤🔡🔤🔤🔡🎞️ ⚡️ 🔤🔡🔡🔤🔡🔤🅰️0️⃣🔤⚡️ 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟 𝕸𝖎𝖘𝖘 𝕿𝖍𝖆𝖛𝖊𝖑 ✨ 😀😀🌟𝕸𝖎𝖘𝖘 𝕮𝖎𝖗𝖈𝖑𝖊 🤩 😀😀 🌟𝕸𝖎𝖘𝖘 𝕭𝖑𝖔𝖔𝖒𝖎𝖊 ✨ 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🤩🤩🤩🤩 °𝔭𝔥𝔬𝔱𝔬 𝔟𝔶: 𝕽𝖎𝖓𝖆° 🤩🤩 🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩 «. 𝑅𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡/𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑐𝑡🥹» 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ⭐️⭐️⭐️ #пост
custom 59250472418520627151
Signed ПавєлШкібідіСігма228(Паві)
Здорова заебал
🍓1
Signed ПавєлШкібідіСігма228(Паві)
❌❌🌟🌟ʳᵉᵈʳᵉᵈꜝ ❌❌ ᴛ-ᴛ-ᴛ-ᴛᴏᴜᴄʜ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ᴘɪᴛᴄʜ, ʟɪɴᴇ 'ᴇᴍ ᴜᴘ, ᴅᴏɴ'ᴛ ᴍɪꜱꜱ 切り開き轟かせ､ ᴡʜᴏ ᴀʀᴇ ʏᴏᴜ? 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 реакт/репост?
custom 59250472418520627151
Signed ПавєлШкібідіСігма228(Паві)
┏┈┈༒𖤐༒┈┈┓ 𝐃𝐎𝐔𝐌𝐀 ┗┈┈༒𖤐༒┈┈┛ -.༺ ⛧ ⏜ཐི ⊱꯭𝅄۫۫۫🩸𝆬⃝ ཋྀ۫۫۫𝅄꯭⊰ི ⏜ ⛧༻.- “How pitiful… Humans cry so easily.” “Allow me to save you forever.” ── 𓈒 ۫ ｡ ☠︎ ◌⃝ ❄️ ◌⃝ ☠︎ ｡ ۫ 𓈒 ── There is no anger. No love. No fear. Only amusement. 𔘓 ࣪˖ ྀི 𓂃 🪭𝐏𝐎𝐒𝐓 𝐈𝐍 𝐈𝐍𝐒𝐓🪭𓂃 ྀི ˖ ࣪𔘓 ◞🜍⃝ 𝆺𝅥 ︶ 𓈒 ︶ 🕯 ︶ 𓈒 ︶ ☠︎⃝◟ ╭┈────༺🩸༻────┈╮ 𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐛𝐲 𝐉𝐨𝐡𝐧𝐧𝐲 ╰┈────༺🩸༻────┈╯ ─ ꒰ა⛓️໒꒱ ─ 𓂃 ─ ꒰ა ☠︎ ྀི໒꒱ ─ rp/rt?
custom 59250472418520627152
Signed ПавєлШкібідіСігма228(Паві)
Photo, posted without a caption
🍓1
Signed ПавєлШкібідіСігма228(Паві)
ось наше #дефіле з двох ракурсів та трішки смішнявих фоточок!! мені дуже сподобався анік та нас дуже красиво пофоткала Ріна!! скоро буде крутєйший постік гатовтєсь знову понию що мені абідна що ми нічого не зайняли, але ми плануємо ще кудись податися с більш крутим дефіле!! а ще мені вперше за багато часу подобається дефіле тому що багато моїх виступів мені не подобаються😭😭
custom 59250472418520627152
Signed ПавєлШкібідіСігма228(Паві)
Ось наклейкт
custom 59268099264951129782custom 59250472418520627151
Signed ПавєлШкібідіСігма228(Паві)
Велике дякую Ци та Їжидзе за їжу, та наклейки🥹
custom 59268099264951129782💊1custom 59250472418520627151
Signed ПавєлШкібідіСігма228(Паві)
Ч теж
💔2
Signed ПавєлШкібідіСігма228(Паві)
я була готова розплакатись тому що ми нічого не зайняли😭😭😭
Signed ПавєлШкібідіСігма228(Паві)
Якщо у двох словах було ну ДУЖЕ круто🌟🌟 Шкода звісно що нічого не виграли, але все одно, як на мене, призові місця цілком заслужені ⭐⭐ І якщо хтось знімав наше дефіле скиньте, будь ласка у пп @Mystifyyyy
Signed ПавєлШкібідіСігма228(Паві)
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @pavelshkibidisigma228. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“[REST]Павєл Шкібіді сігм або прост Паві🦕🥭” (@pavelshkibidisigma228), 108 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pavelshkibidisigma228.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.