Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Пух Павлов - эксперт во всех областях

@pavelpuck

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

210subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002247121492
TypeChannel
Username@pavelpuck
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pavelpuck

Growth

2107 Aug 2026, 04:32 — 210 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 20:08 — 210 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 04:327 Aug 2026, 20:08
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 209–211 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 20:08210no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:32210first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

107 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁6257.9%
1514.0%
🔥1413.1%
🤣1413.1%
👎10.935%
🤡10.935%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 March 2026 to 27 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jun 2026, 12:00 UTC115 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @true_flipperPhoto

Утираемся и машем...

1

10 Jun 2026, 12:47 UTC≈1,040 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁121

5 Jun 2026, 16:24 UTC264 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

К важным новостям: в Москве запустили роботов-пухососов. @localcrew

😁5🔥2

4 Jun 2026, 04:43 UTC329 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣14🔥2😁1

5 May 2026, 07:30 UTC413 viewsread 7 August 2026

Запомни брат простую фразу - нефть будет 70, но не сразу!

30 Apr 2026, 11:12 UTC339 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

"У Ирана есть только два союзника - его ракетная и ядерная программы"

🔥1

28 Apr 2026, 13:19 UTC346 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Демарш Эмиратов в нескольких плоскостях. Во-первых, после саудитов они были наиболее подвижным, да, членом с максимальным капасити и давно хотели нарастить для них это удобный момент уйти из-под крыла старшего брата, независимую свою политику проводить. Недавно новости были, что израильтяне высаживаются там с ПВО, да, как бы с офицерами. Это, конечно, очень рискованно, скажем так, в непосредственной близости от Ирана

🔥2

21 Apr 2026, 07:23 UTC254 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ближневосточный караван перемирия всегда двигается со скоростью самого медленного переговорщика

4

12 Apr 2026, 14:56 UTC338 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ну чего, логично было, что как-то договорятся и будет деэскал. за мес+ все устали, целей не добились, Иран, вообще говоря, тоже прилично пострадал. Как у Карисалова - все должно было пожениться. Но! проблема сидит в самом ДиДжейТрампе, все-таки его загнали в угол на прошлом шаге - ему пришлось применять тактику, которую обычно юзают более слабые/маленькие игроки, раздувая диапазон защиты стохастикой. Это что-то типа

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pavelpuck. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 745,125 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Пух Павлов - эксперт во всех областях” (@pavelpuck), 210 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pavelpuck.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.