Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PAUK

Channel

PAUK

@pauktrading

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

38subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002629724920
TypeChannel
Username@pauktrading
Created1 May 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/pauktrading

Growth

387 August 2026 — 38 subscribers10 August 2026 — 38 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37–39 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 20:4638no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:3238first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 1 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
7
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 11:08 UTC28 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

💹Result as of july Our trading advisor delivered a solid performance of +14.37% | +1306.50 $ to the deposit this month. In detail : myfxbook

1 Jul 2026, 05:54 UTC76 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

💹Result as of june Our trading advisor delivered a solid performance of +7.79% | +886 $ to the deposit this month. In detail : myfxbook

8 Jun 2026, 11:23 UTC105 viewsread 10 August 2026

✅Trading Advisor Performance Overview ➡️Our trading system (TS) starts with a lot size of 0.01, which means the trading coefficient cannot be reduced further. On average, the TS generates around $500 per month. ➡️Let’s look at how deposit size affects monthly returns: Deposit Monthly Return % ✅500 - 100🏷 ✅1,000 - 50🏷 ✅2,000 - 25🏷 ✅5,000 - 10🏷 ✅10,000 - 5🏷 ⚡️ Important Note o

1 Jun 2026, 05:25 UTC108 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

💹Result as of may Our trading advisor delivered a solid performance of +11.46% to the deposit this month. 👇The maximum drawdown for May amounts to –10.46%.

15 May 2026, 13:20 UTC149 viewsread 10 August 2026

✅ My Trading Strategy "PAUK" Today I want to share the principles behind my advisor. ➡️ Account type: cent account with micro lot. Trading starts with the minimum lot — 0.01 (equivalent to 0.0001 on a standard account). ⚡️ This means you cannot reduce the copy coefficient any further, since smaller lot sizes are impossible — the advisor already operates at the lowest values. ➡️Indicators: only ATR is used. Its role i

30 Apr 2026, 13:06 UTC164 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

💹April Results Our trading advisor delivered a solid performance of +9.32% to the deposit this month. 🏷 The robot runs non‑stop 24/7, remaining active even when markets are closed. 👇 The maximum drawdown reached -35.28% during the Strait of Hormuz negotiations. For the rest of April, drawdown stayed within a stable range of around -2%, confirming the reliability of the algorithm.

7 Apr 2026, 01:57 UTC185 viewsread 10 August 2026

⚡️Account 37327101! Please double-check your copy settings — your account 37327101 is currently set to a x10 copy coefficient. This is extremely high risk. With this setting, any drawdown on my account is multiplied by 10 on yours. For example, a -2% drawdown on my side could result in a complete loss of your deposit. I strongly recommend reviewing and lowering the coefficient to a safer level. It’s important tha

6 Apr 2026, 05:32 UTC177 viewsread 10 August 2026

🏷Hello everyone, 📈You are welcome to follow and monitor my trading account. ✅Platform: MetaTrader 5 (MT5) ✅Account number: 37321998 ✅Server: RoboForex-Pro ✅Investor password: 5@:bEuIBV762

31 Mar 2026, 11:02 UTC173 viewsread 10 August 2026

⚡️Good day! We are excited to announce that our trading advisor has successfully migrated from MetaTrader 4 to MetaTrader 5. This upgrade unlocks a new level of performance and flexibility. While MT4 limited the maximum number of open orders to 200, MT5 expands this capacity to 1,000 — a critical improvement for our advisor, which often required more than MT4 could handle. Beyond order capacity, MT5 delivers a ran

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @pauktrading. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 482,889 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PAUK” (@pauktrading), 38 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pauktrading.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.