Channel
@Copytrade_journal
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,925subscribers
-426 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003287670451 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Copytrade_journal |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 28 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Copytrade_journal |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:08 | 2,925 | -63 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 2,988 | -78 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:56 | 3,066 | -107 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:33 | 3,173 | -20 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 3,193 | -71 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 3,264 | -41 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:58 | 3,305 | -36 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:07 | 3,341 | -10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 3,351 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 3 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (3 April 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,410 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
📈 TOP 6 CopyFX Strategies by Profit (Last 2 Weeks) Over the past two weeks, several traders have delivered outstanding results. Here are the six most profitable strategies on CopyFX right now. 🥇 Strategy 1 (Click for copy) 💰 $33,241 Profit The undisputed leader of the ranking. Exceptional capital growth, strong momentum, and impressive performance make this one of the hottest strategies on the platform. 🥈 Strategy…
🔝 BARKLEY – The Next Big Capital Growth Machine on CopyFX? Every now and then, a strategy appears that immediately captures everyone's attention. BARKLEY looks like one of those rare projects. 📈 In just 4 trading days: 💰 +$15,936 profit 🚀 +159.46% return 📊 To start copying - Click the link ⚙️ Help with settings - Support ⚠️ No account - Create one 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 💵 More than 40 investors have already subscribed to the stra…
📣 Strategy Review 📣 ➡️ Profit - +74.81% ➡️ Lifetime - 74 days ➡️ Risk level - LOW 📊 To start copying - Click the link ⚙️ Help with settings - Support ⚠️ No account - Create one 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Today we're taking a closer look at QuantitativeLabs, one of the most promising strategies currently available on CopyFX 📊 Key Performance Metrics: • Return: +74.81% • Profit: $2,793 • Maximum Drawdown: 18.47% • Account Age: 74 day…
📊 TOP 6 Traders by Monthly Profit The strongest strategies by profit in USD over the last month. 🔥 High profit ⚠️ High risk ➡️ Strategy 1 Profit: +79% Profit in USD: $204,203.75 ➡️ Strategy 2 Profit: +55.47% Profit in USD: $69,834.59 ➡️ Strategy 3 Profit: +111.38% Profit in USD: $23,641.73 ➡️ Strategy 4 Profit: +42.67% Profit in USD: $20,713.34 ➡️ Strategy 5 Profit: +67.88% Profit in USD: $20,365.18 ➡️ Strateg…
📈 New Project for Those Looking for High-Yield Strategies Over the past few years, Copytrade Journal has brought together many investors, traders, partners, and subscribers who closely follow the copy-trading market. ✅ Recently, our long-term partners launched a new project — Copytrading HUB The idea is simple: to collect the brightest, most aggressive, and highest-yield copy-trading strategies in one place. Copy…
📣 Trader Review 📣 ➡️ Profit - +240% ➡️ Lifetime - 100+ days ➡️ Risk level - LOW 📊 To start copying - Click the link ⚙️ Help with settings - Support ⚠️ No account - Create one 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔥 The Strategy: strong profit-to-drawdown ratio and stable growth The Strategy looks interesting primarily because of its balance between profit and drawdown. • Main instrument: XAUUSD What stands out here is the quality of the resul…
🤫 Why do investors often fail to make money with copy trading? 💡 After several years of working with investors and traders, we have noticed one important pattern. There are many strategies in the rankings with impressive returns. Some of them last 6 months, a year, or even longer. But many investors still fail to achieve stable results. 🔍 The problem is not always the trader. Very often, the reason is wrong setting…
🔄 SARUJA AI is breaking its own records again, but now caution is more important than ever ➡️ Profit - +17,748.75% ($410,260) ➡️ Lifetime - 115 days ➡️ Risk level - very high 📊 To start copying - Click the link ⚙️ Help with settings - Support ⚠️ No account - Create one 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 📈 The trader is once again breaking their own previous records. The result is truly impressive. The strategy has covered a huge distance i…
📣 Trader Review 📣 ➡️ Profit - +300% (more than $20k ) ➡️ Lifetime - 200 days ➡️ Risk level - LOW 📊 To start copying - Click the link ⚙️ Help with settings - Support ⚠️ No account - Create one 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔥 The Strategy: strong performance, large personal balance, and a solid recovery after losing days The Strategy is once again looking interesting for further observation. 🛡 The key point here is not only the high ret…
📣 Dear subscribers and partners! 🔄 Don’t lose us. We are on a technical break until July 1. We are preparing a lot of updates for you. Wishing everyone successful trading and big profits
📊 Strategy Review: JamshidNazarov | PAUK ➡️ Start copy The strategy is currently showing a solid positive result: +14.3% return and 855.91 USD profit over 49 days of account history. For a young account, this is a strong start, especially considering that after a drawdown, the strategy managed to recover and continue moving upward. 📊 Key figures: Return: 14.3% Profit: 855.91 USD Maximum drawdown: -35.28% Balance:…
🔝 Dear investors, Many of the traders you are currently copying use not only intraday trading, but also trades that may remain open for several days. • And there is one very important point: all new RoboForex accounts are now opened swap-free. This means you do not pay the broker a commission for keeping trades open overnight. • Sometimes these fees can be very high and may take away a significant part of your prof…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Copytrade_journal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 499,742 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“COPYTRADE journal” (@Copytrade_journal), 2,925 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Copytrade_journal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.