Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Мужской марафон 20 качеств патриархального мужчины.

@patriarxi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

152subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002793258828
TypeChannel
Username@patriarxi
DescriptionМужской канал. Марафон 20 качеств патриархального мужчины!
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/patriarxi

Growth

1527 Aug 2026, 16:51 — 152 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 19:17 — 152 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 16:518 Aug 2026, 19:17
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 151–153 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 19:17152no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:51152first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.11%
avg views ÷ 152 subscribers
Avg views / post
12.3
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held16 (7 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total148
Reactions total19
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
42
Videos
29
Links
57

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
5m 06s
Average length
38s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

23 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1043.5%
👍939.1%
28.70%
👏14.35%
💯14.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC6 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @DonskoiDmitriVideo

Стратегия реформирования Комитета ГД по защите отцовства, материнства и детства. Решил подготовить и отправить в АП и Госдуму стратегию реформирования комитета государственной думы по защите семьи отцовства материнства и детства. Пишите ваши комментарии. Что добавить, убавить. Новый комитет должен состоять как минимум из половины мужчин. Но в чеченской республике напоминаю одни мужчины занимают руководящие посты в

👍1

7 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC8 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @DonskoiDmitri

Часть 2. Други что можно добавить? Буду отправлять письмо о реформации комитета семьи Госдумы. Принятие пакета сопутствующих законов Создание министерства по делам семьи (или усиление полномочий комитета) Масштабирование успешных практик Этап 3 (2030–2032) — Культурная трансформация Достижение целевых демографических показателей Формирование устойчивого общественного мнения Экспорт модели традиционной семьи в стр

👍1

6 Aug 2026, 14:23 UTC12 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @rusupravlenieVideo

Часто самые красивые и важные для человека идеи и проекты так и остаются лежать в столе, ожидая лучших времён. 🤩 Это связано с тем, что такие идеи редко можно реализовать в одиночку, они требуют объединения людей, такие замыслы можно реализовать лишь сложив вместе наши таланты и способности. Но мы разучились объединяться, находить союзников. Мы боимся конкуренции, боимся быть обма

👍2🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 06:12 UTC15 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @DonskoiDmitriVideo

Вот плоды тотальной БЕЗОТЦОВЩИНЫ"Настоящие" мужчины выросшие без отцов" Следующее поколение будет еще более деградировать. Россия вымирает сейчас плотность населения 7 человек на 1 квадратный километр, в Китае 141 человек, в Индии 441 чел на 1 квадратный километр. Это поколение выросшее без отца от силы родит еще более деградированных детей. Внеси свой вклад. Распостраним эту статью всем знакомым. Ребёнок выросший

1👍1💯1

2 Aug 2026, 06:42 UTC12 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @DonskoiDmitriPhoto

Дорогие подписчики, держу вас в курсе и отчитываюсь о проделанной работе. Еще раз хочу от всей души поблагодарить 🙏 всех, кто поддержал меня пожертвованиями на покупку женского литературного паблика. Я долго искал группу с по-настоящему нравственной аудиторией, мы живём в агрессивной безнравственной информационной оболочке, поэтому думаю те кто любит сита длинные тексты сейчас очень мало. Рынок переполнен группами

👍1🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 08:42 UTC9 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @DonskoiDmitriVideo

Комментировать только портить. Что думаете? Какая, демография в потреблудии? Надо давно уже всем понять. Потреблядь не будет рожать!

🔥2

25 Jul 2026, 16:53 UTC19 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @DonskoiDmitriVideo

ПОЧЕМУ В БУРУНДИ РАСТЁТ НАСЕЛЕНИЕ, А НА ЗАПАДЕ ВЫМИРАЮТ? Взял себе по хозяйству поработать 35 летнего парня из Бурундии для меня он представляет помимо, что он работает мощно, но и как объект и представитель государства с патриархальным устройством семьи. Ну уже несколько дней изучаю патриархальную демографическую африканской республики. Меня хлебом не корми, дай на глубоком уровне поисследовать демографическу

👍2

23 Jul 2026, 11:51 UTC14 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @DonskoiDmitriPhoto

Друзья объявляю сбор на покупку женского паблика 🔐 ЗАКРЫТЫМ. Отчитываюсь. БЫЛ ПРИОБРЕТЕН паблик ВК численностью >100 тыс подписчиков. И к нему прилагался паблик в Телеграм канал численностью 2,3 тысяч подписчиков. Паблик куплен за 85 тыс.рублей. Теперь в нашем информационном пуле 170 тысяч подписчиков. Идем к цели💯 информационного патриархалоно- нравственного пула численностью 1 млн подписчиков. Это цель миниму

🔥1

21 Jul 2026, 07:04 UTC18 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @DonskoiDmitriVideo

Друзья пришлите пожалуйста заполненную анкету или инкогнито мне в личку, или открыто в комментариях. 📋 АНКЕТА ДЛЯ МУЖЧИН: ПСИХОСОЦИАЛЬНЫЕ И ДЕМОГРАФИЧЕСКИЕ ПОСЛЕДСТВИЯ НАРУШЕНИЯ СЕКСУАЛЬНОЙ ЭТИКИ В СЕМЬЕ 🧠👥 Уважаемый участник! Цель данного опроса — изучить ваш личный опыт и мнение относительно влияния добрачного поведения партнёрш и супружеских измен на жизнь мужчины. Ваши ответы помогут в разработке междисциплина

🔥1

21 Jul 2026, 07:04 UTC12 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @DonskoiDmitri

АНАЛИЗ ПСИХОФИЗИОЛОГИЧЕСКИХ И СОЦИАЛЬНЫХ ПОСЛЕДСТВИЙ СУПРУЖЕСКОЙ НЕВЕРНОСТИ И РЕТРОАКТИВНОЙ РЕВНОСТИ У МУЖЧИН: ВЛИЯНИЕ НА ЛИЧНОСТЬ, СЕМЬЮ И ДЕМОГРАФИЧЕСКУЮ СТАБИЛЬНОСТЬ Аннотация В данной статье представлен системный анализ влияния женской внебрачной и добрачной сексуальности ( половой жизни) на психофизиологическое состояние мужчины. Рассматриваются феномены фазы ретроактивной ревности (осознание добрачных связей

🔥1

21 Jul 2026, 07:04 UTC9 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @DonskoiDmitri

Тело (Нейробиология стресса): Организм реагирует на измену так же, как на физическую угрозу жизни. Происходит «захват миндалевидного тела» . Надпочечники выбрасывают гигантские дозы кортизола и адреналина. Это вызывает тахикардию, спазмы сосудов, бессонницу, потерю аппетита или компульсивное переедание. Иммунная система угнетается и очень сложно выйти из этого состояния. Энергия: Наблюдается резкий обвал витального

🔥1

21 Jul 2026, 07:04 UTC14 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @DonskoiDmitri

Для сыновей: Отец, переживший унижение, может неосознанно транслировать сыну страх перед женской сексуальностью, недоверие к женщинам, либо, наоборот, формировать у него гипертрофированное, токсичное мужское поведение как защитную реакцию. Для дочерей: Девочки, видя боль отца и поведение матери, могут усвоить деструктивные паттерны отношений. Если мать имела беспорядочные связи, у дочери размываются границы допустим

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @patriarxi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Jul 2026, 06:41 UTCAnonymous Poll40 voters

Нужно ли наказывать за блуд, для роста демографии?

  1. Да и мужчин и женщин, НО женщин строже43%
  2. Да и мужчин и женщин, НО мужчин строже18%
  3. Только женщин38%
  4. Только мужчин3%
  5. Нет не надо нормально все. Вымирать так вымирать.15%

The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,312,747 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мужской марафон 20 качеств патриархального мужчины.” (@patriarxi), 152 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/patriarxi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.