Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝕷𝐈𝒇𝖤【𝕻𝗮𝘀֟֟፝𝖘꯭𝟏𝕠𝗇】

@pass1onlif

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

155subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003938935906
TypeChannel
Username@pass1onlif
Description.✦ ݁˖𝓩др𝐚в𝐜твуй милый д𝐩уг. Гл‌ушит ультр𝐚звук𝐨м, 𝐨ст𝐚лись т𝐨льк𝐨 п𝐚ру см𝐞шных и глупых 𝐜ук @lifeCWAB 𝕴;𝐍𝕱𝐎 — @pass1oninf 𝐁;𝕺𝐓 — @pass1onflbot 𝕷;𝐈𝕱𝐄 — @pass1onlif 𝐓;𝕿 — @pass1ontt
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/pass1onlif

Growth

1558 Aug 2026, 10:00 — 155 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 18:46 — 155 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 10:008 Aug 2026, 18:46
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 154–156 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 18:46155no change
8 Aug 2026, 10:00155first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.1%
avg views ÷ 155 subscribers
Avg views / post
31.2
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.20%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (7 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total624
Reactions total16
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 18:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
192
Videos
22
Links
59

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5438117122943264012743.8%
custom 5438390553446230808318.8%
custom 5440659881021452057212.5%
custom 5440700919433962819212.5%
custom 543846244690379629916.25%
custom 543861265479504225316.25%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pass1onlif. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 17:53 UTC16 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

❯❯ ꤫ꥈ #𝐉𝔸𝖧𝗢𝕯𝐀 ❮🤩❯ ⎯ #shp𝓟𝖘𝟏 ⎯ Благодарю так же лоэна за звёздочку

custom 54407009194339628191

8 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC16 views2 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

❯❯ ꤫ꥈ #𝐉𝔸𝖧𝗢𝕯𝐀 ❮🤩❯ ⎯ #shp𝓟𝖘𝟏 ⎯ Спасибо огромное прекрасному, очаровательному лоэну за подарок в лайф. Мы тоже тебя оченн любим

custom 54381171229432640122

8 Aug 2026, 12:08 UTC26 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

. . .𝖭𝕰𝗪 𝖀𝐍𝖨𝕆𝗡 ⎯𝑆ℎ𝑒 𝒂𝒔𝒌𝒆𝒅 𝒎𝒆 𝑖𝑓 𝑠ℎ𝑒 𝑤𝑎𝑠 𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒕𝒕𝒚 𝑊𝑒𝑙𝑙 𝑖𝑡'𝑠 𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝒈𝒊𝒓𝒍𝒔 𝒂 𝒇𝒓𝒐𝒖𝒏𝒅⎯ ⎯𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒'𝑠 𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒚 𝑛𝑜 𝑤𝑎𝑦 𝒐𝒇 𝒘𝒊𝒏𝒏𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝐼𝑓 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆 𝒆𝒚𝒆𝒔 . . 𝑦𝑜𝑢'𝑙𝑙 𝒂𝒍𝒘𝒂𝒚𝒔 𝑏𝑒 𝑎 𝒅𝒖𝒎𝒃 𝒃𝒍𝒐𝒏𝒅𝒆⎯ 𝔇𝑬𝑪𝟏𝑨𝑵 𖹭【𝕻𝗮𝘀֟֟፝𝖘꯭𝟏𝕠𝗇】 ⎯⌗𝟏𝐍𝐅: @DCN1_Info ⎯⌗𝐋𝟏𝐅: @DCN1_life ⎯⌗𝐓𝐑𝐂.: @EB3R1Y_w1 #newunion𝓟𝖘𝟏

custom 54386126547950422531custom 54407009194339628191

8 Aug 2026, 02:44 UTC35 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

❯❯ ꤫ꥈ #𝐋𝗢𝕳𝝣𝖭 ❮ ❯ ⎯#shp𝓟𝖘𝟏⎯ гав гав?

custom 54406598810214520571

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pass1onlif. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 48,458 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 33 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

⌗𝙇𝙄𝙑𝙀 𝙋𝙍𝙊𝙅𝙀𝘾𝙏: 𝘼𝙚𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙣𝙖 𝙇𝙪𝙣𝙖 ::
@Aeterna_Luna_LIVE · 21
2 posts
𝘊𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘙𝘢𝘺ᵘᶰᶦᵒᶰ
@CRunion · 4
2 posts
союзы астрея
@astreaunions · 11
1 post
[Закрыто] 𝐋𝐈𝐕𝐄 ♡ྀི₊𝐵𝓁𝒪𝒪𝒟 𝒟𝐸𝒲
@blooddew_liv · 29
1 post
𝕮𝖔𝖓𝖘𝖙𝖊𝖑𝖑𝖆𝖙𝖎𝖔𝖓 𝕽𝖆𝖞ᴸᶦᶠᵉ
@CARayLife · 118
1 post
𝐔𝐍𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐒 | 𝐂𝐀𝐑𝐏𝐄 𝐃𝐈𝐄𝐌
@CarpeDiemUnion · 9
1 post
𝖽𝖺𝗋𝗄 𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖾||𝗟𝗜𝗙𝗘
@darkreverie_life · 80
1 post
𝐔.ۨ𝐍ۧ𝐈ۜ𝐎𝐍۪𝐒 𝐄.ۨ𝐕ۧ𝐎ۜ𝐈𝐑۪𝐄
@evorAMOR · 13
1 post
𝕷𝕴𝕱𝕰 || 𝙁𝘼𝙇𝙎𝙀 𝘾𝘼𝙇𝙈
@fals1calm_life · 106
1 post
⋅ ⋅ㅤ⎯ ㅤ𝖦𝖠𝖬𝖫𝖤ㅤ⎯ ㅤ 𝘜𝘕𝘐𝘖𝘕 𝘒𝘐𝘕𝘐𝘊𝘏
@GM_K1N1CH · 2
1 post
niwᴀ's uniᴏnsᴴⱽᴹ
@hvm_unniv · 4
1 post
Союзы Исаги
@IsagiUnions · 2
1 post
Закрыт # 𝖫𝖨𝖥𝖤 :’...
@l1feSURVIVAL · 31
1 post
Life Channel "Flowers of Temptation"
@laifflowerstemptations · 41
1 post
𝗟𝗜𝗙𝗘 𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗡𝗡𝗘𝗟 | hᴏly ᴄᴏᴏᴋiᴇs
@LifeChanelHolycookie · 22
1 post
закрыто. 𝐿𝐼𝐹𝐸 ▸▸ 𝐋" 𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗑.
@LUMEXlife · 101
1 post
𝐔𝐍𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐒 . 𝐅𝐀𝐌𝐈𝐋𝐘 𝐔𝐍𝐈𝐎𝐍
@lumexunion · 7
1 post
ₘᵢₖᵤ ᵤₙᵢₒₙₛ 𔗂꯭ֺ 𝕮𝐡ɑׁׅ𔓕‌ִꑄ ִ𝆹𝅥 𓈒𝐒𝕔𝖗ꪱׁׁׁׅׅׅᏢɨ ۫𝆬⃝ ִֺ𝅄𝆹ִֺ𝅥ৎ
@MikunionsCS · 2
1 post
𝗟𝗜𝗙𝗘:: ᯓ 𝘗𝘦𝘳𝘧𝘦𝘤𝘵 「𝗖𝗥𝗜𝗠𝗘!」
@PerfectCrime_LIFE · 126
1 post
Союзы
@soisiks · 3
1 post
Unions Aventurine #𝔰𝘯𝚝
@union_Aventurine · 4
1 post
﹫ A‌ָ࣪𝗡:ꓷ֕𝐄 ⃟🌺 𝗠ָ࣪𝖠𝖫𝖨֕𝖭ℰ𝖫‌𝖫𝖤 ❜ : 𝐔𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗌
@unions_AML · 5
1 post
UNIONS | 『ᏫᎮ』𝕺𝖐𝖙𝖔𝖌𝖗𝖆𝖒 𝕱𝖑𝖔𝖔𝖉『ᏫᎮ』
@UnionsOkt · 8
1 post
[CLOSE] • 𝖂︎︎۞︎𝐍̲֟֟፝𝐃̲𝐄𝐑° ||𝙇𝙄𝙁𝙀
@W0ND3RL1FE · 39
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝕷𝐈𝒇𝖤【𝕻𝗮𝘀֟֟፝𝖘꯭𝟏𝕠𝗇】” (@pass1onlif), 155 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pass1onlif.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.