Channel
@pashhhhhhhaa
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
23subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004436974463 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pashhhhhhhaa |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 2 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pashhhhhhhaa |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 12:20 | 23 | -1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 10:36 | 24 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 25 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 26 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:06 | 27 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 26 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:52 | 26 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
98 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 57 | 58.2% | |
| 😱 | 23 | 23.5% | |
| 👏 | 13 | 13.3% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 3.06% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 2.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 98 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 2 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Те, кто писал доносы Мизулиной, должны готовиться к ответственности за клевету. Мизулина это просто так не оставит. Она постоянно напоминает, что клевета - это уголовно наказуемое, и она обязательно привлечет виновных. Помните, что вас подставила подслушка. Ваше личное дело и будущее могут быть разрушены из-за них.
❤10👏5🔥2
Вспомним разоблачение на Лену. В нем шла речь о других людях, а не о самой Лене, которая не несет ответственности за поступки своих знакомых. Китайца обвинили в пдф - без каких-либо доказательств. - Если бы он действительно был виновен, то были бы заявления в полицию от жертв. Заявлений нет. - Разоблачение собрало 2 миллиона просмотров, и полиция точно обратила на него внимание. Он бы уже сидел, если бы фейковые обв…
❤8👏4👍3
Рекомендуем канал: @crush1ng_blow В нём разоблачают клевету подслушки. Приводят факты, доказательства и слова свидетелей.
❤8
Слова Павла о том, как Лена старалась создать для админов максимально комфортную атмосферу. А в разоблачении противоречит сам себе. Человек лжёт во всём. Что касается "Сек.. и спер.." обсуждал это именно Паша. Мы уже выкладывали скрины о батюшке и других вещах. Затем эти сообщения удалялись, чтобы Лена их не увидела и не выгнала за подобное. Лена могла исключить из админов за оскорбление подписчиков. Были случаи, ко…
❤8😱4👏1
Павел в открытую рассказывает о своей работе курьера по котикам. Он рассказывает, сколько закладок уже успел разбросать по городу. В планах он говорит, что собирается продолжить работу и даже перебраться работать в Москву, потому что там "миллионы" за это платят.
😱6❤4
Внимание! Данный материал носит исключительно информационный характер. Наш канал не пропагандирует употребление, изготовление и распространение наркотических средств, психотропных веществ и их аналогов. Напоминаем, что незаконное приобретение, хранение, перевозка, изготовление и сбыт наркотиков влекут за собой строгую уголовную и административную ответственность в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации…
😱5❤3👏3
Video message, posted without a caption
😱4
Video message, posted without a caption
😱4
Video message, posted without a caption
"А я 5 штук (закладок с котиками) раскидал минут за 15"
❤1
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pashhhhhhhaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Паша пдфайл” (@pashhhhhhhaa), 23 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pashhhhhhhaa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.