Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🔥 Павел Доронин про ИИ, агентов и вайб-кодинг

Channel

🔥 Павел Доронин про ИИ, агентов и вайб-кодинг

@pasha_doronin

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,550subscribers

+17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001572027172
TypeChannel
Username@pasha_doronin
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/pasha_doronin

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,5271,5501,538.56 August 2026 — 1,533 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,533 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,532 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,530 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,527 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,529 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,541 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,542 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,540 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,538 subscribers17 September 2026 — 1,550 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 42 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,524–1,553 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 12:161,550+12
9 Sept 2026, 09:561,538-2
4 Sept 2026, 11:011,540-2
28 Aug 2026, 23:061,542+1
25 Aug 2026, 22:191,541+12
22 Aug 2026, 20:361,529+2
19 Aug 2026, 17:441,527-3
16 Aug 2026, 21:071,530-2
10 Aug 2026, 03:311,532-1
6 Aug 2026, 07:351,533no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:501,533first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

39 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍923.1%
820.5%
🔥512.8%
😁410.3%
🤣410.3%
🙏37.69%
25.13%
💯25.13%
😎12.56%
🤩12.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 06:32 UTC95 viewsread 7 August 2026

Push / Pull strategy в бизнесе и жизни Можно стараться делать Push - толкать, подталкивать, продавливать, дожимать, А можно учиться делать Pull - притягивать, вызывать интерес, создавать спрос Первое требует много усилий и преодоления сопротивления Второе требует тонкого ума, насмотренности и внимательности к чувствам людей Со стороны эти действия даже могут выглядеть одинаково Но ощущается совсем по-разному Я

4 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC125 viewsread 7 August 2026

Если создавать крутые таблицы, документы, стратегии, аналитики, автоматизации и все-все любое интеллектуальное теперь может ИИ Все то, что занимало у нас 90% времени труда То что теперь ценность от нас? Что нам остается? Ваши версии)

1 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC196 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Дарить эмоции Последнее время активно погружаюсь на новые слои темы продаж Начиналось все с поверхностного слоя - там, где живут «воронка», «офер», «конвертеры» и так далее Для меня даже это было уже вау Но всегда ощущалось, что это техника, а не суть И вот недавно приземлимся на простую формулу «дарить эмоции» Классная формула, правда? И очень простая и конкретная Дарить = желать безвозмездно дать (важно иск

2👍2💯2

31 Jul 2026, 07:13 UTC272 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❗️Новая схема увода Telegram - я чуть не попался… Мне вчера пришло сообщение от человека, с которым последняя переписка была несколько лет назад Там было приглашение в стиле: «Привет! Давно не общались! Как дела? Давай созвонимся и обменяемся новостями? Вот ссылка на мой Calendly [ссылка на календли]» Я и записался на радостях) На фото видно, что там я сам организатор А сегодня утром этот человек мне пишет: «не

👍4🔥4🤣2

29 Jul 2026, 07:47 UTC238 viewsread 7 August 2026

Друзья, а проголосуйте, пожалуйста Кто еще не успел Хочу сделать анонс ивента на основе результатов опроса 😎

25 Jul 2026, 13:32 UTC337 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Штука засчитывается ;) Если кто пропустил - вот тут можно тоже попробовать

👍1🤩1😁1

24 Jul 2026, 07:34 UTC304 viewsread 7 August 2026

Делать, как другие На фоне этого активизировался сразу второй старый механизм «Вот он тот крутой, он делает круто, он точно знает как круто - надо делать, как он» Вместо «У меня свой путь, свой вайб, своя миссия - делать, как чувствую» Как это вообще связано?)

24 Jul 2026, 07:10 UTC266 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Отторжение от того, чем жил много лет Проживаю интересное состояние Наблюдаю резкое отторжение от магического мышления Хотя сам жил этим активно несколько прошлых лет При этом на коучинге есть человек, кто хочет делать продукт в этой нише - тут нормально Но когда на себя примеряю - брррр Понаблюдаем дальше У вас было такое?

2

23 Jul 2026, 08:04 UTC271 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Курьер везёт коробку на самокате по вечернему городу ахахха это кто такое сделал?! пробуйте тоже! весело!)

🤣2

23 Jul 2026, 07:01 UTC253 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Инфографики для презентаций и сайтов Меня всегда мучал вопрос - как быстро делать нужные инфографики для разных визуальных материалов Чаще всего это были презентации и промо-сайты Все Проблема решена Сделал для себя скилл, который всегда делает ровно то, что мне надо Пользуюсь уже больше месяца, а вчера вечером подумал... А чего им пользуюсь только я? Ловите;) 👉 https://skills.pavel-doronin.com/svg-viz А во

2

22 Jul 2026, 15:04 UTC242 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Необычные ощущения, когда добавил своего личного ИИ-ассистента в нового тг-бота И он сам себя проверяет на свои способности - умеет ли распознавать картинки и аудио Умеет Теперь вопрос - зачем он нарисовал желтый круг? И почему именно его? Делайте ставки - а я потом спрошу у него ;)

22 Jul 2026, 08:41 UTC286 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Все хотят все… И как мне теперь понять, на чем сделать акцент в 3 потоке AI Masters? 🫣

😁3

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @pasha_doronin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Jul 2026, 07:15 UTCAnonymous Poll44 voters

Что вам сильнее всего хочется от ИИ?

  1. Понять, что это и как пользоваться25%
  2. Сделать свой продукт, свою идею41%
  3. Автоматизировать свою персональную рутину41%
  4. Автоматизировать конкретные процесс(ы)32%
  5. Повысить эффективность команды20%
  6. Делать контент, медиа, креативы16%
  7. Сделать себе персонального ИИ-ассистента36%
  8. Иное11%
  9. Посмотреть результаты32%

The shares total 254%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🔥 Павел Доронин про ИИ, агентов и вайб-кодинг” (@pasha_doronin), 1,550 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pasha_doronin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.