Channel
@parvazcoaching
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,452subscribers
+14 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001772582961 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @parvazcoaching |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/parvazcoaching |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 1,452 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:55 | 1,460 | -12 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 1,472 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:05 | 1,477 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 1,476 | +10 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:22 | 1,466 | +13 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 1,453 | +15 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 1,438 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 1,438 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 265 |
| Reactions total | 26 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
211 reactions across 15 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 175 | 82.9% | |
| 👍 | 36 | 17.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 211 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
۷ چیزی که بیسروصدا کیفیت زندگیت رو پایین میارن: – تصمیمهای عقبافتادهای که مدام ذهنت رو اشغال میکنن – محیطهایی که بیشتر از چیزی که متوجه اش باشی، انرژیت رو میگیرن – کارهای کوچیکی که میدونی باید انجام بدی، اما هر روز با خودت حملشون میکنی – مقایسه مداوم زندگی خودت با چیزی که از زندگی بقیه میبینی – بینظمیهای کوچیکی که هر روز مجبوری دوباره باهاشون سروکله بزنی – عادتکردن به چیزهایی که مدتهاست میدونی برا…
❤19👍7
+ پیشنهادم برای این چند روز تعطیلی، اگه خونه ای و سفر نرفتی.
❤13
همه درباره کتاب چنددهمیلیونی حرف میزنن، اما جذابترین بخش این پروژه رو میتونید رایگان تو یوتیوب ببینید. در هر قسمت وارد خونه یکی از مادربزرگها میشیم؛ غذای محلیاش رو میپزه و بین آشپزی، از زندگی، خاطرات و دغدغههاش میگه. اگه از اون دسته اید که دیدن قصه واقعی زندگی آدمها برایتون جذابه، «تا هفت خانه آنورتر» ارزش چند ساعت وقت گذرونی تو یوتیوب رو داره. #فیلم_هفته @parvazcoaching 🕊️
❤14
این روزها اسم کتاب «تا هفت خانه آنورتر» صابر ابر زیاد شنیده میشه؛ نمایشگاهش هم در گالری اِیت/کیوب برگزار شده و حتی شنیدم نسخهای از کتابش حدود ۳۵ میلیون تومن قیمت داره. اما قصهی این پروژه خیلی جذابتر از قیمت کتابش هست. برای ساخت این پروژه سراغ ۱۰۰ مادربزرگ در ۳۰ شهر و روستا از ۱۴ استان ایران رفتن؛ البته هدف فقط جمع آوری رسپی غذاهای اصیلی و محلی نبوده… .
❤9
🦦چرا بعضیها کمتر تلاش میکنند، اما بیشتر نتیجه میگیرند؟ یکی از باورهای رایج ما این است که اگر به چیزی نرسیدهایم، احتمالاً «به اندازه کافی تلاش نکردهایم.» اما همیشه اینطور نیست. احتمالاً آدمهایی را دیدهاید خیلی منظم، سختگیر یا پرتلاش نیستند و حتی اکثر اوقات بی خیال به نظر میرسند اما در بعضی بخشهای زندگی، نتایج بهتری از کسانی میگیرند که دائماً در حال تلاشاند. بی انصافی است! اما چرا اینطور میشود؟ تفاوت گا…
❤11👍3
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤1
خیلی وقتا رشد ما متوقف میشه، چون هنوز به نسخهای از خودمون وفاداریم که یه زمانی برامون کار میکرد، اما امروز دیگه جواب نمیده. گاهی برای رفتن به یک سطح بالاتر، لازمه نسخهی تازهتر و توانمندتری از خودمون بسازیم. همین حالا از خودت بپرس: آیا نسخهی فعلی من، برای رفتن به سطح بعدی زندگیم مناسبه؟ روز به خیر🌞 @parvazcoaching
❤14👍3
In.happy.moments|توسعه فردی pinned a file
Insight Report No.001 Redefining Luxury —— همه دوست دارن سطحبالاتر دیده بشن. اما بیشتر ما، سالهاست «لوکس بودن» رو با «ثروتمند دیده شدن» اشتباه گرفتیم. شاید وقتش رسیده تعریفش رو از نو ببینیم. #insightreport #آموزش_رشدفردی @parvazcoaching 🕊️
❤18👍4
Researching Human Potential Less noise. More insight. هیاهوی کمتر، بینش عمیقتر. اگه اهل توسعه فردی باشی، احتمالاً این حس برات آشناست… کتابهای زیادی خوندی. پادکستهای زیادی گوش دادی. دورههای مختلفی گذروندی. اما گاهی با خودت فکر کردی: «پس چرا هنوز اون تغییری که انتظارش رو داشتم، اتفاق نیفتاده؟» شاید مسئله، کمبود اطلاعات نباشه. شاید چیزی که کم داریم، بینشهای بهتر باشه؛ بینشهایی که اطلاعات رو به تصمیمهای بهت…
❤16
سه نشونه که شاید کمتر از چیزی که تصور میکنی، مستقل فکر میکنی؟ 1️⃣ اگه همه آدمهای اطرافت یک انتخاب رو تأیید نکنند، باز هم همون انتخاب رو انجام میدی؟ 👁️🗨️اگه جوابت «نه» هست، شاید نیاز به پذیرفته شدن، از ارزشهات قوی تر شده باشه. ———————— 2️⃣ آخرین باری که بعد از شنیدن یک نظر گفتی «نمیدونم، باید بیشتر دربارهاش فکر کنم» کی بوده؟ 👁️🗨️ذهن مستقل، عجول نیست. ———————— 3️⃣ آخرین بار کی با یکی از باورهای قدیمی خودت …
❤11
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @parvazcoaching. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
تو بیشتر کدومی؟
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“In.happy.moments|توسعه فردی” (@parvazcoaching), 1,452 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/parvazcoaching.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.