Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Reactive Network | Announcement Channel

Channel

Reactive Network | Announcement Channel

@parsiq_channel

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

991subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001233877960
TypeChannel
Username@parsiq_channel
Created30 May 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/parsiq_channel

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9831,0019926 August 2026 — 1,000 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,001 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,000 subscribers14 August 2026 — 998 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,001 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,000 subscribers29 August 2026 — 999 subscribers7 September 2026 — 990 subscribers15 September 2026 — 983 subscribers30 September 2026 — 991 subscribers9916 August 202630 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 55 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 980–1,004 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Sept 2026, 10:57991+8
15 Sept 2026, 10:20983-7
7 Sept 2026, 22:20990-9
29 Aug 2026, 07:53999-1
26 Aug 2026, 17:221,000-1
20 Aug 2026, 14:041,001+3
14 Aug 2026, 05:17998-2
10 Aug 2026, 16:061,000-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:171,001+1
6 Aug 2026, 20:321,000first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

314 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥19361.5%
❤9831.2%
👍154.78%
🤩30.955%
😁20.637%
🎉10.318%
👏10.318%
🤔10.318%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 314 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC264 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Gm Reactors 📈 Reactive x Coinstancy We're happy to announce the latest project to deploy their solution live on Reactive Mainnet! Coinstancy now uses Reactive to keep crypto portfolios automatically aligned with target allocations. As prices move, a single reactive contract on Reactive Mainnet watches Chainlink feeds across chains. When a basket drifts too far, it emits a verifiable on-chain rebalance request. Coi…

❤17

4 Aug 2026, 12:44 UTC322 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Gm Reactors 📈 Uniswap Hook Incubator Highlight #4 - Lambda by Hijanhv As part of this highlight series from the recent UHI developer campaign, today we’re looking at Lambda, the Uniswap v4 hook that protects liquidity providers from price swings by automatically keeping a matching short position on a perpetual futures exchange, even though the pool and the exchange live on completely different chains. Using Reacti…

🔥11❤1

30 Jul 2026, 13:14 UTC428 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Gm Reactors 📈 Uniswap Hook Incubator Highlight #3 - TrancheShield by Ahmet Tahir Yıldız As part of this highlight series from our recent developer campaign Reactive took part in, today we’re looking at TrancheShield, the Uniswap v4 hook that protects liquidity against impermanent loss. A Reactive Contract watches the pool from the outside for volatility spikes, thinning reserves, or waves of withdrawals. It then a…

🔥14❤1

27 Jul 2026, 13:45 UTC454 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Gm Reactors 📈 Uniswap Hook Incubator Highlight #2 As part of this highlight series aimed at our most recent developer campaign, today we're taking a look at Unistrata, the Uniswap v4 hook that turns a regular liquidity pool into something more like a bond, with a protected “senior” share and a riskier “junior” share. Unistrata uses Reactive Network’s CRON timer plus live volatility signals so the pool can settle o…

❤9🔥1

23 Jul 2026, 12:40 UTC462 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Gm Reactors 📈 Reactive X Voltrade - Kucoin Trading Competition In just over an hour the trading competition on Kucoin, held in partnership with our friends at Voltrade will go live! When? Starts today July 23rd 2PM UTC. Ends August 6th. Compete for a share of 5,000 USDC in prizes with a 4,300 USDC main prize pool and a 700 USDC daily lottery for traders with over $500 in volume per day. Maximum $25K daily volume…

🔥13

22 Jul 2026, 17:57 UTC462 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Gm Reactors 📈 Reactive x Voltrade - Kucoin Trading Competition We're teaming up with our friends at Voltrade to run a trading competition exclusively on Kucoin for REACT/USDT! When? Goes live tomorrow July 23rd 2PM UTC and runs until Augst 6th. Compete for a share of 5,000 USDC in prizes with a 4,300 USDC main prize pool and a 700 USDC daily lottery for traders with over $500 in volume per day. Maximum $25K dail…

🔥13

20 Jul 2026, 15:01 UTC463 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Gm Reactors 📈 We recently sponsored the 9th edition of the Uniswap Hook Incubator alongside the Uniswap Foundation to see what builders could create by combining Reactive Contracts with Uniswap V4 Hooks. Over the next couple of weeks we'll be sharing detailed case studies of these builds, starting with: Uniswap Hook Incubator Highlight #1 - EvenFlow The Uniswap v4 hook that smooths out LP returns by solving the “…

🔥11

20 Jul 2026, 10:23 UTC419 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Important Notice: MEXC Following an internal review, we have decided to remove support for REACT on the MEXC exchange. MEXC currently represents only around 1% of REACT’s total trading volume, making the continued allocation of liquidity and resources there inefficient. We remain fully committed to expanding REACT’s presence across higher-volume platforms, we're currently working on volume-based incentive programs …

👍14😁2

15 Jul 2026, 14:09 UTC605 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Gm Reactors 📈 Uniswap Hook Incubator 9: The First Wave The Uniswap Hook Incubator (UHI) is a campaign run by Atrium Academy and sponsored by the Uniswap Foundation, designed to introduce new builders to Uniswap V4 Hooks. It just so happens that V4 Hooks and Reactive Contracts have some incredible synergies, which is why we decided to co-sponsor UHI9 after already seeing some great results in UHI8. During the event…

🔥12❤2

13 Jul 2026, 10:05 UTC572 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Gm Reactors 📈 Reactive Staking: Season Seven Later today on block 6,055,034, Reactive staking season six will come to an end and season seven will launch on the next block at 6,055,035. This season was set at only 1 month (30 days) to allow flexibility due to the upcoming launch of CometBFT consensus on Reactive Mainnet as well as updates to our validator mechanism. Development of both is progressing well but not…

❤11

2 Jul 2026, 15:37 UTC659 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Gm Reactors 📈 Fiet's Settlement Automation Goes Live on Reactive Network You may remember Fiet as one of the projects we announced an integration with earlier in the year, aiming to automate liquidity settlements for their users without compromising on their current, fully on-chain, decentralized flow. We're glad to announce that this solution is now live on Arbitrum and Reactive Mainnet, tried and tested! Want to…

🔥16❤12

30 Jun 2026, 13:04 UTC692 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Gm Reactors 📈 Tokenomics 2.0 At launch, Reactive Network followed an Ethereum-style model: no fixed supply, transaction fees burned, and token emissions to support validator rewards. While this made sense for a young network under centralized development, it also created confusion and relied heavily on trust in a single team. This is now changing. As Reactive transitions to a fully open-source model (opening up th…

🔥16❤5🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @parsiq_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Reactive Network | Announcement Channel” (@parsiq_channel), 991 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/parsiq_channel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.