Data collection conference/meetup
Митап о сборе данных
Тематические объявления и посты бесплатно размещаем
По всем вопросам можно обращаться в чат
https://t.me/joinchat/HvuCPzwpPJHrrDfC
или в личку @NikolayKrupiy @cuda23
Created
Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 519–521 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Aug 2026, 18:32
520
no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:31
520
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 2 February 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
35.4%
avg views ÷ 520 subscribers
Avg views / post
184
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 July 2026
Posts held
20 (2 February 2022 – 16 July 2026)
Views total
184
Reactions total
3
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
6
Videos
2
Links
167
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
58 reactions across 10 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
17
29.3%
🔥
13
22.4%
❤
10
17.2%
😁
5
8.62%
👎
3
5.17%
🕊
3
5.17%
👌
2
3.45%
🥰
2
3.45%
🤡
1
1.72%
🤬
1
1.72%
🤮
1
1.72%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 February 2022 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Появился доклад с первого митапа
Как настроить Claude Code, OpenAI Codex и других AI coding agents так, чтобы они стабильно выполняли инженерный workflow, запускали тесты, соблюдали документацию и проверяли собственный код.
Подписывайся на канал, тогда все уведомления в ютубе будет получать
Митап 3
💪 Для попадания на митап, необходимо зарегистрироваться для получения ссылки можно в группе
О чем встреча?
В четверг будет митап по агентам, вайб-кодингу и всему, что прямо или косвенно связано с ИИ. Ограничений нет
Цель митапа
Найти паттерны, которые можно стабильно применять в бизнесе и прикладных задачах. Удачные находки те, которые у многих появляются неазвисимо
Спикеры
⏺Сравнение харнесов: Claude cod…
Всем привет, организую митап
О чем встреча?
На следующей неделе в четверг будет митап по агентам, вайб-кодингу и всему, что прямо или косвенно связано с ИИ. Ограничений нет
#Митап
🕖 Время: Четверг 19:00 11.06.2026, таймзона GMT+3
📍 Место: онлайн, регистрация будет позже
Цель митапа
Найти паттерны, которые можно стабильно применять в бизнесе и прикладных задачах. Удачные находки те, которые у многих появляются неаз…
Запускаем новые #рубрики! (а то чот канал совсем пустует 😅)
Для желающих и соответствующих требованиям в канале будут бесплатно публиковаться (обязательно релевантность тематике канала — парсинг):
- Объявления на #поиск спецов / #вакухи:
- по требованиям к оформлению для попадания в пост давайте ориентироваться на t.me/data_career/1576
- под любой тип занятости – хоть задачу на пару часов, главное – по формату
…
RPA challenge - это специальный сайт, для тренировки навыков парсинга и автоматизации. Каждый раз, когда вы обновляете страничку, он полностью перестраивает структуру. Пройти соревнование полностью роботом нетривиальная задача. Человек же пройдёт её легко.
Основатель этого канала, между прочим, рассматривает предложения) Ниже его текст:
Привет! Меня зовут Егор (@eurvanov)
Я в поиске позиции для себя
English variant CV
Русский вариант CV
Интересы 📚
- участие в принятии решений о стратегии компании
- управление ФОТом
- построение орг. структуры в моём подразделении/компании
- построение процесса работы на уровне моей орг. структуры
- ответственность за показатели под…
Илон Маск буквально запретил читать вам много Твиттера. Нововведения:
— Верифицированные учётные записи ограничены чтением 6000 сообщений в день.
— Обычные аккаунты до 600 постов в день.
— Новые аккаунты до 300 постов в день.
Если вы достигаете лимита — лента перестаёт грузиться. Маск объясняет новые меры «борьбой с манипуляциями» и парсингом данных из соцсети.
Накануне Твиттер запретил смотреть посты незарегистри…
Коллеги, ищем разработчиков для создания парсеров по индексации научных сайтов, отрасль медицина. Текст, pdf, js. Если кому-то интересно, пожалуйста, напишите в ЛС.
@Kmilchakov
Возможно, будет будет полезно
Я относительно большому числу людей помог за последний год. Особенно большой поток есть в части карьерного роста и получения первой работы
Я решил собрать этот опыт в одном месте, чтобы и самому его не забыть и поделиться им
Сейчас менторством перестал заниматься, но хочу, чтобы контент остался бы
https://t.me/want_to_it
В это непростое время, я хочу сделать автепати ArchDays (https://archdays.ru/) в Турции, в Анталии, в Коньялты.
Если Вам или Вашим друзьям интересно, залетайте: https://t.me/arch_days_antalya
Предположительно, начало в 18-00 по МСК, 21 октября 2022
Вероятно, в течение дня будет онлайн-просмотр. Бесплатно
Signed Егор
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @parsing_conf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,311,550 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@parsing_conf named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@arch_days_antalya named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@jegor_lu named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Parsing Conf” (@parsing_conf), 520 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/parsing_conf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.