Channel
@parisanasrizananbahoosh
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,297subscribers
-61 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001335508324 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @parisanasrizananbahoosh |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/parisanasrizananbahoosh |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 16:16 | 9,297 | -9 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 9,306 | -9 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 08:20 | 9,315 | -15 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 11:20 | 9,330 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:14 | 9,331 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 9,334 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:06 | 9,341 | -8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 9,349 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 9,350 | -6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 9,356 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 9,358 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
185 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 148 | 80.0% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 11.4% | |
| 👌 | 7 | 3.78% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 3.78% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 1.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 185 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2025 to 26 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📌 مسئله این نیست کدوم تیپ سختتره… مسئله اینه آیا مهارت برخورد باهاش رو داری یا نه؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤11
زن با سیاست 👑 🔹 اول هیجانشو مدیریت میکنه 🔹 مرز جدی و شفاف میذاره 🔹 تصمیمشو از روی عزتنفس میگیره، نه ترس یا رابطه رو بازسازی میکنه… یا با قدرت تمومش میکنه. اما در هر دو حالت، بازنده نیست✅
❤9
اما مهمتر از خودِ خیانت، نحوه رفتار بعد از اونه👀 بیشتر زنها یا با خشم واکنش انفجاری نشون میدن 💥 یا از ترسِ از دست دادن، کوتاه میان… و هر دو حالت، قدرت رو از دست میدن❌
❤6
بعضی مردها اگر درست مدیریت نشن، ریسک بحران بالاتره: 🔹 متعهدگریز → فرار از مسئولیت 🔹 خودشیفته → نیاز به تحسین بیرون 🔹 سرد یا کنترلگر → فاصله عاطفی پنهان مسئله بد بودن نیست… مسئله نداشتن مهارته. 🎯
❤6😢2
خیانت معمولاً ناگهانی نیست… یه «روند» خاموشه. ⚠️ از جایی شروع میشه که فاصلهها جدی گرفته نمیشن و تیپهای شخصیتی درست شناخته نمیشن.
❤4
1️⃣ مرد بیشازحد وابسته به مادر (مامازاده) استقلال تصمیمگیری نداره و نفوذ مادر در زندگیش پررنگه. 2️⃣ مرد متعهدگریز و مسئولیتنپذیر از آینده و تعهد فرار میکنه؛ بیشتر اهل وعدهست تا عمل. 3️⃣ مرد خودشیفته (نارسیسیست) نیاز دائمی به تحسین داره و احساسات دیگران براش اولویت نیست. 4️⃣ مرد بیشازحد وابسته عاطفی بدون توجه مداوم احساس بیهویتی میکنه. 5️⃣ مرد سرد و بیشازحد منطقی احساسات رو کماهمیت میدونه و ابراز عاطفه…
به نظرت ارتباط با کدوم مردها سخت تره؟💆🏻♀️
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
✅در روابط عاطفی، بعضی تیپهای مردانه ذاتاً بد نیستند… اما اگر شناخته نشن، میتونن رابطه رو فرسایشی کنن. شناخت این تیپها یعنی پیشگیری از آسیب عاطفی🌱
تفاوت این دو نفر تو احساسشون نیست؛ تو مهارتشونه. 🎯 اگه حس میکنی از مرکز توجه رابطه خارج شدی، شاید وقتشه سیاستِ رابطه رو یاد بگیری، نه جنگیدن برای توجه رو. برای همین یه وبینار رایگان «سیاستهای زنانه» داریم 🎓 جایی که یاد میگیری چطور دوباره تبدیل بشی به انتخابِ آگاهانه، نه گزینهی دمدست. 👑 اگه حس میکنی این مهارت به دردت میخوره جای تو خالیه 🤍 🔷ثبت نام وبینار زنان با سیاست . دکتر پریسا نصری🌿
❤3😁1
واقعی و بیقضاوت انتخاب کن 👇
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
و خبر خوب اینه که… 🌿 این یه استعداد ذاتی نیست که بعضیا داشته باشن و بعضیا نه. یه مهارته. مهارتی که اگر یادش بگیری، نه لازم میشه التماس توجه کنی، نه میترسی از اینکه جایگاهت کمرنگ بشه. تو یاد میگیری چطور بدون فشار آوردن، دوباره تبدیل بشی به نقطهی امن و جذاب رابطه.
اینجاست که دو مدل رفتار شکل میگیره 👇 🔸 یه زن شروع میکنه به گله کردن، بیشتر چسبیدن، بیشتر توضیح خواستن… میخواد دوباره مهم بشه اما ناخواسته فاصله رو بیشتر میکنه. 🚫 ❕❗️❕❗️ 🔹 یه زن دیگه، قواعد بازی رو میفهمه. میدونه توجه رو نمیشه گدایی کرد؛ باید خلقش کرد. ✨ بهجای دعوا سر «چرا من اولویت نیستم؟» کاری میکنه که بودنش تبدیل به آرامش و اشتیاق بشه. 💎
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @parisanasrizananbahoosh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
📌 مسئله این نیست کدوم تیپ سختتره… مسئله اینه آیا مهارت برخورد باهاش رو داری یا نه؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
به نظرت ارتباط با کدوم مردها سخت تره؟💆🏻♀️
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
واقعی و بیقضاوت انتخاب کن 👇
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
(- اولش همه چی عالی بود، ولی الان با همه خوبه فقط من دیگه اولویتش نیستم💔) کیا رابطهشون اینجوری شده؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2025 to 26 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“باشگاه زنان باهوش” (@parisanasrizananbahoosh), 9,297 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/parisanasrizananbahoosh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.