Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Парфюм есть? А если найду?

Channel

Парфюм есть? А если найду?

@parfkakparf

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

782subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001909005553
TypeChannel
Username@parfkakparf
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/parfkakparf

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

782789785.57 August 2026 — 786 subscribers7 August 2026 — 786 subscribers14 August 2026 — 788 subscribers22 August 2026 — 789 subscribers29 August 2026 — 788 subscribers7 September 2026 — 785 subscribers15 September 2026 — 782 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 39 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 781–790 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 05:19782-3
7 Sept 2026, 19:18785-3
29 Aug 2026, 06:57788-1
22 Aug 2026, 16:18789+1
14 Aug 2026, 17:59788+2
7 Aug 2026, 06:05786no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:00786first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 16 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

291 reactions across 11 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6121.0%
custom 52085981852236616765819.9%
custom 52089373459061234925318.2%
custom 52290543070006583764916.8%
❤‍🔥3010.3%
🔥175.84%
💔93.09%
😍31.03%
🤝31.03%
🦄31.03%
👀20.687%
10.344%
🌚10.344%
👏10.344%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 291 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 11 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @parfkakparf. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC84 views29 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Сфотографируй меня, сфотографируй». Ну и как тут устоять.

custom 520859818522366167614custom 52089373459061234928❤‍🔥4custom 52290543070006583763

24 Jul 2026, 19:20 UTC208 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Видимо, лаванда с ванилью в «Pour Un Homme de Caron» настолько милы, что оса решила прикусить мою шею. Носите осторожнее) А на фото экспонат Зоологического музея.

10custom 52290543070006583765💔4❤‍🔥2custom 52085981852236616762custom 52089373459061234922🔥1

24 Jul 2026, 06:03 UTC175 views19 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Обещанный новый формат, где я вместе с Анной отгадываю ароматы по отзывам. Было волнительно, весело и приятно. Спасибо за просмотры и обратную связь 🧿

custom 52089373459061234927custom 52290543070006583765😍3custom 52085981852236616762❤‍🔥1👏1

20 Jul 2026, 11:36 UTC195 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Новый формат на Ютуб-канале, скоро 🍿

custom 52085981852236616768custom 52089373459061234924custom 52290543070006583764❤‍🔥3🔥2

18 Jul 2026, 11:27 UTC211 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Собиралась написать про османтусы, но в итоге меня сманил «La Nuit Tombée» Serge Lutens. Когда я попробовала его впервые, то мне показалось, что я вижу там те же самые отсылки к «La Couche du Diable» и «Fille en Aiguilles», о которых пишут в отзывах, но сравнив параллельно все три аромата могу сказать, что они не являются взаимозаменяемыми. «Fille en Aiguilles» слишком деликатна и имеет иные акценты, чтобы сравнива

custom 520859818522366167611custom 52290543070006583765❤‍🔥4🌚1🔥1🦄1custom 52089373459061234921

11 Jul 2026, 17:41 UTC225 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вывод дня: классический «Shalimar» все так же хорош и это амбровая база, а дождь лучший hair stylist. Нормальные посты тоже будут, собираюсь поговорить о османтусе.

18custom 52089373459061234926custom 52290543070006583765custom 52085981852236616764🔥21❤‍🔥1

6 Jul 2026, 10:19 UTC309 views23 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Побывала гостем на канале НюхАнна и поучаствовала в распаковке «L'Eau Mixte» Nicolai. Было весело, надеюсь, вам будет тоже 🧿

🔥11custom 52085981852236616764custom 52290543070006583764❤‍🔥2custom 52089373459061234922

28 Jun 2026, 14:16 UTC350 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В каком парфюмерном проявлении самый красивый чубушник для вас?

11custom 52290543070006583768❤‍🔥6custom 52085981852236616765custom 52089373459061234922

19 Jun 2026, 06:03 UTC415 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Видимо, вчерашняя жалоба сработала и видео с летними ароматами наконец-то загрузилось. Приятного просмотра 🧿

custom 52089373459061234928❤‍🔥6custom 52085981852236616765custom 52290543070006583763

18 Jun 2026, 19:29 UTC286 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мое выражение лица, когда я пытаюсь загрузить видео на Ютуб второй день подряд

13💔5custom 52089373459061234925🤝3👀2🦄2custom 52290543070006583762

16 Jun 2026, 15:37 UTC289 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вчера выдался приятный артовый день - незапланированное, а от этого еще интереснее, посещение андеграундной галереи «Автограф сквер». А ароматом дня (кроме дождя, цветений, запаха краски, пыли и активных шлейфов прохожих) стал «Point Du Jour» Serge Lutens - было красиво, шалфейно-травно и даже дымно, а еще удивительно стойко. Чабрец наконец-то удалось расслышать.

9custom 52089373459061234928custom 52290543070006583765custom 52085981852236616763❤‍🔥1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @parfkakparf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Парфюм есть? А если найду?” (@parfkakparf), 782 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/parfkakparf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.