Channel
@parf_nata
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
348subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001577963796 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @parf_nata |
| Created | 26 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/parf_nata |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 03:54 | 348 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 349 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 348 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 349 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 351 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 351 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
87 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 39 | 44.8% | |
| ❤ | 36 | 41.4% | |
| custom 5456606952857545029 | 9 | 10.3% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.15% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.15% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.15% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Маленькие ярославские каникулы. Упшикались с мамой всеми моими привезёнными бутыльками, потом унюхались всеми её флакошами, потом нашли очень-сильно-чрезвычайно красивый ирис. Можно ехать дальше
❤8❤🔥3
Signed Наташа
L'Eau de Tarocco Diptyque Пряное средиземноморское лето. Весёлые барашки морской пены бегут к зелёным берегам, узкие мощёные улочки утопают в розах, на деревьях зреют маленькие оранжевые солнца, а высоко в небе висит гигантский красный апельсин 🔆
❤8❤🔥1
Signed Наташа
Август уже... До сих пор не могу понять, как это работает. Почему ты два раза моргнул, и уже август? А можно чуть медленнее?
❤🔥5
Signed Наташа
Aqua Allegoria Rosa Verde Guerlain. Такой розы у меня ещё не было. Свойственные розам нюансы, от остро-пряных до фруктово-ягодных, здесь дополнены огуречной акватикой, овощными тонами и эфирами напоённых дождём сорных трав. Роза-барышня, роза-крестьянка. Утонченная, холодная, горделивая, она вместе с тем простая и милая. Разодетая в бархат роза на фоне живописных пасторальных пейзажей. Роза, затянутая в атлас, бла…
❤7❤🔥3🔥1🥰1
Signed Наташа
Иногда, погостив у бабушки, я забираю с собой не только корзинку с пирожками, контейнеры с оливье и запечённой курочкой, но и что-нибудь душистое. Прошлой зимой утащила к себе в берлогу Gardenia Passion Annick Goutal, а недавно Idylle Guerlain. Ба ими не пользовалась, стояли у неё на полке в ванной, как она сказала, для красоты. Мне кажется, лет так четырнадцать стояли. Я на них косилась каждый раз, когда мыла руки,…
❤🔥10
Signed Наташа
У нас сегодня 35°+, пекло, духота, парилка, липкость. Но, оказывается, это идеальное время для Shinanay Nishane. Разве это законно так роскошно благоухать? Первый раз за время ведения блога лень писать подробнее, лень делать фотографию. И вообще всё лень. Хочется только пить ледяной лимонад и наслаждаться дивным ароматом.
❤3❤🔥2custom 54566069528575450292
Signed Наташа
Video, posted without a caption
custom 54566069528575450294❤🔥1👍1
Signed Наташа
К своему юбилею Ладаника выпускает коллекцию роз. А в моих трясущихся ручонках ознакомительный сет-секретик из пяти ароматов без названий, описаний, пирамид и указания парфюмеров. Не люблю слепые затесты, но розовые слепые затесты – совсем другое дело. К тому же это классная возможность заранее выбрать свою розу. 🌹 Номер раз и сразу такое мощное начало! Восставшая из пепла роза Феникс. Роза с огненными крыльями, гор…
❤🔥7
Signed Наташа
Вышли на 15 минут прогуляться с мужем. Я была психованная и злая (на мужа). И, конечно, на фотосессию не рассчитывала. Но она внезапно случилась) Обнаруженный в сумке Дождливый Остров Une Ile Pluvieuse Senyoko пришёлся очень кстати, в том числе и по цвету, потому что помимо петрикора, мокрой листвы и пасмурного неба в нём ярко ощущаются лилово-сиренево-фиолетовые цветы: фиалки и сирень. А ещё он успокаивает не хуже б…
❤6custom 54566069528575450293❤🔥1
Signed Наташа
Сегодня в Dance of the Dawn The Different Company Композиция вдохновлена пачулями, построена вокруг пачулей, сделана из пачулей, на пачулях едет и пачулями погоняет. По ощущениям пачулей здесь целая плантация. Однако хороший баланс с другими яркими нотами сделал их звучание нетипичным. С одной стороны, они хорошо читаемы, узнаваемы, а с другой – не похожи сами на себя. Не найдёте вы в них ни подвальной сырости, ни к…
❤🔥6❤4
Signed Наташа
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @parf_nata. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Парфманьяк обыкновенный” (@parf_nata), 348 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/parf_nata.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.