很多人不明白,长年累月地取笑自己的孩子,哪怕打着开玩笑的幌子,也会在孩子的心里留下挥之不去的阴影。 因为即使只是比较轻微的言语伤害,如果持续十年、二十年,而说这些话的人又是一个在几乎所有重要方面都对你有权威、让你不得不服从的人,那这种伤害造成的负面影响会不断累积,变得非常严重。 source

Channel
亲子时间
@parenting_drama
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
977subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001159100863 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @parenting_drama |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/parenting_drama |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 977 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:36 | 980 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 980 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 30 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.01%
- avg views ÷ 977 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 88.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (30 January 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 88 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 20:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
4 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
想要识破“自然分娩无需医疗干预”的谎言,最好的办法就是在网上关注一位养羊人。我是认真的。总有人试图叫孕妇不要去医院,声称女性的身体构造天生就适合分娩,有时候这类谎言很难识破。除非你亲眼目睹过牧羊人在接羔季节所经历的那些惊心动魄、跌宕起伏的时刻。母羊的身体构造明显比我们更适合分娩,它们的骨盆结构不像我们的这么奇怪,小羊羔的头也没有人类婴儿这么大。它们的出生按道理应该是最理想化的“自然分娩”。然而在接羔季节照看羊群的人类仍然需要处于一种不间断的高度戒备状态,随时准备进行医疗干预。因为就算对于母羊而言,分娩过程也并非天生顺利,往往还是需要人类的介入。 而且,即使有人类照料协助,不少母羊和羊羔仍然会难逃死劫,频率还相当高。也就是说,即使把绵羊这种已经独自在野外分娩了百万年的生物,放到近乎完美的条件下,分娩仍然时常致命。 人类婴儿如此脆弱,而且女性的生理结构导致分娩过程如此困难,以至于在过去的50万年里,人类倾注了全部的智慧、技术与协…
❤3
不要去问小女孩“你有没有男朋友” 不要一看到小女孩和小男孩一起玩,就把小男孩说成是她们的“小男朋友” 不要对小女孩说她们“以后肯定会有男朋友的”、“到了年纪自然会对男孩子犯花痴” 不要把那种把异性恋视为唯一标准规范的想法强加给小孩子,请让小孩好好享受童年 这样做: 1. 一点都不好玩 2. 一点都不可爱 3. 只会让小孩难堪 4. 如果小孩表达了否认了你还要坚持说这些话,那你就是完全无视了小孩的感受 同样的事情也不要强加给小男孩。 他们不是什么“小花花公子”。 他们欺负女孩子的时候不要用“他暗恋她”当借口。这种行为既不正常也不可爱,而且需要被纠正。 还有不要总去说小男孩暗恋年长很多的成年女性,这样真的很恶心。 让小孩子好好享受童年好吗。 根本不存在什么“男人和女人天生做不了朋友”。事实上就是 “你把小孩子之间的正常互动强加上浪漫爱的含义,变成了一件让人不舒服/难堪的事,通过社会规训阻止他们和异性建立纯友谊的亲密关系”。 不…
在还未成年的时候,我曾经尝试过逃离家庭,却发现自己根本无法获得任何社会救济,只能在走投无路之后再次回到虐待我们的父母的身边。因此当看到有人故意曲解“儿童解放”这个概念的时候,我真的很生气。我们应该建设一个能允许曾经的我离开家庭获得庇护、为我自己和我弟弟的安全争取保障的社会,而这,就是“儿童解放”。 在这样一个社会里,遭到忽视的孩子们有权为自己争取必要的医疗服务。 在这样一个社会里,孩子们能接受到“如何为自己争取权利”的相关教育,学会如何为自己发声,有效表达自己的需求和意愿。 在这样一个社会里,所有人都必须以平等的态度对待孩子,尊重孩子的身体自主权,保障孩子不被剥削和虐待的权利;家长无权强迫孩子接受不必要的医疗干预(如强迫间性人孩子接受“性别矫正”),也无权禁止孩子接受医疗服务;同时,家长无权以“在家教学”为名隔离或监控孩子。所有从家长手中夺回的权利,必须回归孩子本人,而不是交由任何其它人代为行使。 “儿童解放”不仅仅是确保孩子…
当你侵犯了孩子的隐私时,你传达出了三件事: 1. 你不尊重Ta们作为独立个体的权利。 2. 你不相信Ta们能自己解决问题或寻求帮助。 3. 你可能没有认真地倾听Ta们。 几乎所有你认为你必须通过窥视才能获得的信息,都可以通过与你孩子的交流和倾听来获得。 source
只要你开始对所谓的“问题少年矫正产业”但凡有一点真正的了解,你都会感受到前所未有的愤怒和荒谬。这个行业从概念到实际操作,没有一处不是充满了罪恶。你大叫“难道没人发现这里的邪恶吗”,却发现毫无回声,你的声音被淹没在了社会的“习以为常”里,因为“矫正”常态之外的孩子,正是维系和制造所谓的常态的一环。是时候为青少年的权利而斗争了! 问题少年矫正产业,军队产业,青少年监狱产业,青少年行为治疗产业 —— 在我们的社会你可以合法从事虐待青少年和孩子的工作,甚至选择还不少呢! source
我有慢性疾病,这种疾病会伴随我的一生。我的确诊是在青春期,但所有人都隐瞒了我。 直到最近,因为偶然间翻找出了以前的病历,我才知晓了自己的病情。病历记录很残缺,我甚至不知道是哪个医生给了我诊断,又是谁做出了隐瞒我本人的决定。我感觉自己像一个私家侦探,翻这个翻那个,急急忙忙探查我本人自己的病史。我有很多很多问题,其中只有很小一部分找到了答案。 这当然是重大的医疗过失。但另一方面,这也说明了我们社会对儿童的自主权有多么无视,甚至到了一个孩子连会影响一生的病情都被隐瞒的程度。 评论:你以为不让孩子知道自己有慢性病,孩子就会觉得自己是正常孩子吗?不会的。孩子只会觉得很痛苦很困惑,不知道自己究竟在哪些事情上会需要帮助,不知道在需要帮助的时候该怎么堂堂正正说出口。 source
❤1
我真的很讨厌“这人家庭有问题”成为攻击别人嘲笑别人的话。 一个人最脆弱无助的时候,本应该提供情绪支持的父母却没有提供关爱,不是这个受到伤害的人的问题。 source
“给你吃给你穿你必须感恩戴德”的父母,常常因为孩子在找到能为自己提供温饱和尊严之路时永远离开而感到震惊不已。 这些父母也会对你再也不“听话”而震惊。“你要是打耳洞,我就——”,你能怎么样我?你现在还能威胁我吗? 对这些父母来说,养育你而不能驱使你,是丢脸的事情;让你为生存忍受痛苦,才是值得骄傲的事情。一旦你发现出路,毫不犹豫立即逃离,你父母也不会有任何反思,只会非常震惊而已。 source
所谓的根据性别来“养育男孩”/“养育女孩”的育儿方式真的是太没有道理了。 我小时候完全是我爸爸的跟屁虫,我会偷偷跟着我爸爸到车库里,非常好奇地看他修车或者做别的事情。家里人对我的行为并不是很支持,虽然Ta们也没有直接说“女孩子不能去”之类的话。 很快,我弟弟出生了。所有人都觉得他一定会和我们爸爸一样喜欢修车,仅仅是因为他是个男孩。可惜我弟弟和我完全不一样,他根本不喜欢待在车库,也对我们爸爸在车库里做的事情一点兴趣都没有。等到他长到一定年纪的时候,我爸爸会要求他“帮忙”,甚至常常是他正在做他真正喜欢的事情的时候。我爸爸的做法让我弟弟很不开心,两人常常为此争吵。当然到最后,我弟弟也没有在“被迫帮忙”的过程中学到任何和修车相关的技术。 根据性别来“养育男孩”和“养育女孩”的方式,忽略了那个真正的有自己的兴趣、有自己的性格、有自己的行事方式的小孩,甚至是强行把那个真正的小孩变成所谓的“理想的男孩”/“理想的女孩”。 我真实的弟弟…
当你侵犯了孩子的隐私时,你传达出了三件事: 1. 你不尊重Ta们作为独立个体的权利。 2. 你不相信Ta们能自己解决问题或寻求帮助。 3. 你可能没有认真地倾听Ta们。 几乎所有你认为你必须通过窥视才能获得的信息,都可以通过与你孩子的交流和倾听来获得。 source
我想起来一个视频 是一个妈妈和她大概两岁的女儿 妈妈给视频加了字幕 “我父母的诅咒见效了” “我真的生了一个性格和我一模一样的小孩” 然后她说 “但我父母的说法完全错误” “她是一个非常可爱也非常值得被爱的小孩” source
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @parenting_drama. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,199,766 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“亲子时间” (@parenting_drama), 977 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/parenting_drama.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.