Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дедушка курил, до 100 лет дожил

Channel

Дедушка курил, до 100 лет дожил

@paramonovrassvet

Not marked by Telegram, checked 23 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,301subscribers

+126 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002236583464
TypeChannel
Username@paramonovrassvet
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/paramonovrassvet

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,1686,3016,234.57 August 2026 — 6,175 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,176 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,177 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,175 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,174 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,178 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,175 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,176 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,172 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,168 subscribers6 September 2026 — 6,172 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,174 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,173 subscribers25 September 2026 — 6,178 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,191 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,241 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,263 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,267 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,268 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,290 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,289 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,297 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,300 subscribers8 November 2026 — 6,301 subscribers7 August 20268 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 93 days, net +126. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,148–6,321 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 19:516,301+1
5 Nov 2026, 02:516,300+3
30 Oct 2026, 00:596,297+8
27 Oct 2026, 01:386,289-1
23 Oct 2026, 20:486,290+22
20 Oct 2026, 11:096,268+1
17 Oct 2026, 19:006,267+4
15 Oct 2026, 04:406,263+22
12 Oct 2026, 02:376,241+50
5 Oct 2026, 00:566,191+13
25 Sept 2026, 18:586,178+5
15 Sept 2026, 00:406,173-1
11 Sept 2026, 11:596,174+2
6 Sept 2026, 16:586,172+4
1 Sept 2026, 23:456,168-4
30 Aug 2026, 09:036,172-4
27 Aug 2026, 11:456,176+1
24 Aug 2026, 21:346,175-3
20 Aug 2026, 20:536,178+4
17 Aug 2026, 10:166,174first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 26 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.6%
avg views ÷ 6,301 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,490
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held26 (26 March 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total8,935
Reactions total449
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 13:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3,048 reactions across 25 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,42546.8%
🔥72023.6%
❤‍🔥44214.5%
🤣983.22%
👌632.07%
✍451.48%
🤯431.41%
🤪361.18%
😢341.12%
🤝190.623%
😨140.459%
🙏120.394%
🙈110.361%
🥰110.361%
💯100.328%
🤡100.328%
🥴100.328%
🍾80.262%
😍60.197%
🤬60.197%
13 further kinds250.82%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,048 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 26 March 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 26 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @paramonovrassvet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 March 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 10:14 UTC834 views55 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Отдельная история — аутоиммунный гастрит. Там уничтожение желёз связано с иммунным процессом. Ни один из перечисленных препаратов не показал убедительного восстановления оксинтической слизистой. Есть интересные эксперименты с блокадой рецепторов гастрина для лечения нейроэндокринных опухолей I типа, но это воздействие на последствия атрофии, не на неё саму. А главное, зачем нам вообще уменьшать атрофию? Чтобы предо…

👍36🥰11🙏5❤‍🔥2⚡1

Signed aleksey

5 Nov 2026, 09:48 UTC871 views34 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Можно ли отрастить желудок? Или как лечат атрофию и кишечную метаплазию В прошлый раз обсуждали диагностику хеликобактера и зачем при гастроскопии брать биопсию. Сегодня поговорим о том, что делать, если в ней обнаружилась атрофия или кишечная метаплазия. Можно ли вернуть желудку нормальную слизистую? И что предлагают для этого фармацевтические компании? Начнём с плохой новости. Атрофия означает утрату нормальных …

❤‍🔥19🙏7🔥4👍2🤡1😐1

Signed aleksey

21 Oct 2026, 15:21 UTC≈1,850 views105 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Гастроскопия как и когда. Отечественный приказ по диспансеризации определяет гастроскопию профилактическую в 45. Многие ее делают. Приносят результат «поверхностный гастрит». Иногда «экспресс-тест на H.pilory отрицательный или положительный. Что можно сказать по этому заключению? Только что очевидного рака или язвы нет. Даже о наличии хеликобактера судить нельзя, ибо отечественный экспресс-тест на коленке деланный ид…

👍58❤‍🔥30🔥17

Signed aleksey

21 Oct 2026, 15:21 UTC≈1,290 views56 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Эндоскопические методы оценки и гистологические коррелируют, но не совпадают. Например, может быть минимальное эндоскопическое повреждение уровня С1 и при этом в биоптате будет атрофия желез 75%, что соответствует OLGA 3. Почему так? Потому что в конкретной точке получения биоптата может быть продвинутая атрофия, а на соседних участках нет. Европейский консенсус MASP III попытался эти ситуации собрать в сводные табли…

❤‍🔥28🤝14👍13🔥1

Signed aleksey

13 Oct 2026, 17:07 UTC≈2,130 views128 reactionsread 5 November 2026

2. Неинвазивные тесты - С13 дыхательный тест (близок к нему С14, отличия невелики). При правильном выполнении по «точности» может превосходить гистологический, но точно не уступает. Это, как и быстрый уреазный, метод непрямой, он измеряет активность живого хеликобактера. Вам дают выпить реактив с тяжелым изотопом атома углерода, если хеликобактер жив и расщепляет реактив, изотоп появляется в выдыхаемом воздухе. Точн…

🔥86👍33✍8🍾1

Signed aleksey

13 Oct 2026, 17:07 UTC≈1,960 views71 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

А если найду? Давайте тестировать H. pylori правильно Прошлый раз обсудили как избавиться от хеликобактера. Сегодня – как его обнаружить. Хотя он действительно ключевой фактор риска рака желудка, консенсуса в Европе или США о его поголовном тестировании и истреблении нет. В Азии такой консенсус есть. Про то, кого и зачем тестировать, наверное, напишу отдельно, а пока как тестировать. Не существует тестов 100% то…

👍65🤡2🥴2👎1🔥1

Signed aleksey

29 Jul 2026, 16:15 UTC≈1,690 views108 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

По результатам дискуссии в пациентской группе с доктором, практикующим в США. Он полагает, что гистологически подтвержденный гастрит достаточное объяснение для хронической "голодной" эпигастральной боли. Ну что сказать, мысль не новая, и меня так учили в 1 меде в 90х. И учили неправильно, но это был не 2026 год. Удивителен поток пациентов, наших бывших соотечественников, из США, где им при боли лечат "гастрит". Хо…

👍53❤‍🔥25✍22🔥4🤡3👌1

Signed aleksey

22 Jul 2026, 14:20 UTC≈4,120 views253 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Псилиум отличная штука. Если это псилиум и в адекватной дозе. Такая простая вещь как шелуха семян подорожника в одном из обширных обзоров всех методов лечения СРК оказалась на первом месте. Псилиум снижал боль и балансировал стул. Это источник клетчатки, наличие которой в рационе связывают со снижением риска роста полипов. Точек применения много, и, в отличие от большинства БАД, это не пустышка. Однако можно и тут …

👍174🤯35❤‍🔥26🔥9😨6🤡3

Signed aleksey

14 Jul 2026, 13:34 UTC≈3,650 views224 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Медный лоб или пейте водку из оцинкованного ведра. Одна большая компания тратит хренилион денег на оплату ограниченных талантов своего главного HR Я этого человека видел пару раз, выступает на бизнес конференциях. Кажется, что не дурак, но нет. Дурак. Потому что верит в чудеса и не может отделить мифологию с алхимией от реальности. Хотя может его работа анимация для сотрудников? Он их развлекает и ладно. А владелец…

👍133🔥35❤‍🔥27🤣20😨8🥱1

Signed aleksey

6 Jul 2026, 11:05 UTC≈4,180 views143 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Зачем я рисую желудки. Рисовать я не умею. Совсем. Но регулярно на приемах рисую двухмерные примитивные изображения, чтобы показать пациенту механику его болезни. Желудки, рецепторы, связь с мозгом, атрофию, инфильтраты в слизистом слое Зачем? Для комплаенса. Если пациент не понимает зачем назначена таблетка и какую задачу этим назначением он решает, вероятность, что он будет принимать назначенный курс, снижается. …

👍87🔥44✍12

Signed aleksey

12 Jun 2026, 12:55 UTC≈6,030 views116 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

УЗИ с желчегонным завтраком — очень важный предмет исследования в картине мира некоторых врачей. В реальной картине мира это абсолютно бесполезное ритуальное действие. Но эти действия, которые я считаю религиозным обрядом в адрес Асклепия, совершаются регулярно в медицинских организациях разного подчинения — частных и государственных. И по итогам этого бессмысленного действия происходит назначение лекарств. Вот был…

👍91🤪14🤯7❤‍🔥2💯2

Signed aleksey

26 May 2026, 14:15 UTC≈6,620 views156 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Опять врач испугался. На этот раз длительного приема ИПП. Пациенту 12 лет назад сделали антирефлюксную операцию, до которой кислота из него фонтанировала. Но операция дала неполный контроль. Он все эти годы принимал 20 мг омепразола в стуки и чувствовал себя ОТЛИЧНО. В декабре прошлого года ему выполнили плановую гастроскопию в федеральном центре и обнаружили «полипы фундальных желез». Мы с вами их как-то уже обсу…

🔥95👍54🤬5👀1🤡1

Signed aleksey

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @paramonovrassvet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Apr 2026, 15:43 UTCAnonymous Poll1,090 voters approx.

Последний месяц появился поток пациентов которых направляет как вы думаете кто?

  1. Гугл и Яндекс6%
  2. Продокторов и Напоправку6%
  3. Другие пациенты7%
  4. Мама и папа3%
  5. Телевизионные передачи5%
  6. ИИ80%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 26 March 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Намочи манту
@namochimanturu · 56,218
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
Газовый гигант (ibs.doc)🪐
@ibs_doc · 21,729
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 23 September 2026
Инна Тулина хирург онколог, кмн
@inna_tulina_a · 30,510
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
Доктор Утин
@doctorutin · 24,620
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 September 2026
Гастроэнтеролог ХАРИТОНОВ Андрей Геннадьевич
@ag_kharitonov · 58,845
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 22 August 2026
Занимательная эндокринология
@funwithmedicine · 22,748
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дедушка курил, до 100 лет дожил” (@paramonovrassvet), 6,301 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/paramonovrassvet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.