(свага это типа как чичрдг:)
🤯4

Channel
@paramongoilc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
166subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002343701359 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @paramongoilc |
| Description | Posts on (para-)Mongolic linguistics in English, Russian and Kalmyk. Also, pottery and other stuff. Admin @plewgs |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 15 December 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/paramongoilc |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:00 | 166 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 166 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 15 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
200 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍌 | 44 | 22.0% | |
| 🍓 | 41 | 20.5% | |
| 🤓 | 33 | 16.5% | |
| 👀 | 32 | 16.0% | |
| 🤯 | 31 | 15.5% | |
| 👾 | 17 | 8.50% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 1.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 200reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 December 2024 to 6 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
(свага это типа как чичрдг:)
🤯4
/нереальная калмыцкая свага
🤯5🤓2🍌1👀1👾1
Напоминаю, в воскресенье, примерно в 16:00 по Москве и Киеву и 15:00 по Вене будет стрим с исследователем Михаилом Белоусовым, занимающимся монгольскими языками, особенно калмыцким и ойратским, тай и монгами, историей китайского и вьетнамского, языковыми проблемами малых языков. Канал гостя - https://t.me/mongolstudies
👀9🤯2
Недавно у коллеги был пост про статью А. В. Вовина о смешанном японско-корейском стихотворении из Манъёсю. А вы знали, что у А. В. Вовина была такая же статья про киданьско-китайское стихотворение? Моментально захотелось законспектировать все киданьские слова, которые оттуда Вовину удалось восстановить: 設罷 *sarbai «обильный», ср. письменное монгольское sarbai- «быть растопыренным, продленным», калм. сарвах «id.»; 拝洗 …
🍌8👾6🤯3🤓2🍓1
Photo, posted without a caption
🤓8🍌3👾3🍓2👀1🤯1
первая попытка стилизовать тодо бичиг под квадратное (пагба) письмо
👀19🤓3🍌2🤡2
Берестяная грамота № Ст. Р. 104 Предположительно 1004 г. Содержит в себе надпись на китайском языке. Судя по косвенным данным, контакты были установлены напрямую с киданьским государством, поэтому в грамоте использован этноним "кытаици" вместо возможных других названий.
🍓22
по приколу попытался перевести песню Нүүдлә на (псевдо)среднемонгольский, но, конечно же, лексика вся ойратская: asaqan namur-un serigün-lüge arudu-ača-ban salkin üliyemüi ene salkin-u ayas-dur-anu erebeng keüken giyüremüi qola ɣajar-tur yabuɣsan qo-sira-yi-ban sanamui barlaɣad bičigsen bičig-i-inu bayarlaɣad negudelei ungsimui negüdelei negüdelei, negüdelei nidun-cinu sayiqan, negudelei sanaju büü ukila salki…
🤓6🍓4👀1
нүүдлә — лиҗин улан айс үг хойрнь: җимбин бадм самое знаковое и классное для меня исполнение песни (может быть потомучто каноничное). голос улан барбаевны, замечательный аккомпанемент и душа, заложенная автором. пару раз я плакал под эту песню и долго заслушивался ей. классика. не отрицаю другие версии, просто обожаю эту. А вот теперь представьте. Она его любила. Они были друзья. Студенты, конец 30-х. Астрахань. Пот…
🍌3
Photo, posted without a caption
собственно в комменты тгк @tmrdmg скинули мем про цаатанов-чаатнов и их чоканье
бригада к мему: письменного ойратского не существует т.к. на тодо бичиге в калмыкии писали вплоть до 1924 г., и переходы были оч плавными, трудно выделить именно письменный ойратский, типа, даже тот же английский язык 17-18 века уже считается современным английским, но "письменный ойратский" и калмыцкий разделяют сильнее, чем стоило бы биткеев дурак а>о>а реально произошло вопрос вокруг спора, было ли в ойратском яз…
🍓6🤓4
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @paramongoilc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 217,486 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@paramongoilc named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“*dɪʁa” (@paramongoilc), 166 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/paramongoilc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.