3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 709–711 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 22:07
711
+2
8 Aug 2026, 02:17
709
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:57
709
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 25 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 03s
Average length
41s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
850 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
551
64.8%
🔥
136
16.0%
👍
86
10.1%
🎉
32
3.76%
😁
28
3.29%
🍾
12
1.41%
🤩
4
0.471%
👏
1
0.118%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 850reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2024 to 20 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Обзор на свечу «No one fights alone» от волшебницы Снежаны 🌟
Эта свеча — трибьют истории «О значении крови», в которой главная героиня борется с раком. Название свечи так же отсылает к лозунгу некоммерческой организации, помогающей всем, кто столкнулся с этим диагнозом.
В трудную минуту важно помнить, что ты — не один. Всегда можно попросить о помощи или протянуть руку тем, кому тяжелее. Поэтому часть прибыли с про…
💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛 💛
🔵Книга с автографом автора отправится к @nyutikveretennikova
🔵Свечу получает @paula_raven
🔵Набор открыток достаётся @Lyubava_Sukhanova
Поздравляем победителей и свяжемся со всеми утром! Всем спасибо за участие 💛
На осень мы уже запланировали кое-что интересное💛
⭐️ 💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛 ⭐️
Ровно три года назад, 18 августа 2021 года, Lisa Bell выложила первую главу своей большой истории — «Исцели мои раны». Истории о человеке, задающемся вопросом: есть ли у меня право на исцеление?
Вместе с Лизой в честь дня рождения истории мы решили сделать подарок нашим подписчикам. Три победителя получат три частички этой истории: книгу с автографом автора, свечу и набор открыток!
Условия участия…
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Спойлеры-спойлеры🧳
Дорогая Анечка сделала иллюстрации к серии THE ISSUES, думаем, сделать из них какой-нибудь мерч. Проголосуйте, пожалуйста, какой формат вам интереснее 💋
Эти иллюстрации лежат в отложке уже около полугода. И, мне кажется, лежали бы ещё столько же, но М. сказал "давай как на экзамене, ручку отложила, листик сдала". Ну и спустя два часа обработки в войсчате я сдалась 😁
#paprika_заметки
Арт от чудесной jarause как повод вернуться с ответами 🌾
🎀Закончила музыкальную школу по классу аккордеона — неправда, закончила худ.школу, а на гармони учил играть дедушка
🎀 Начала ловить рыбу в 3 года — правда, зимняя рыбалка база моих детских воспоминаний
🎀Занималась верховой ездой — к сожалению, это пока ложь, лошади the best
🎀 Работаю на острове — правда, более того, работаю в замке :)
🎀 Заботилась о 50+ до…
🎀 young and sweet only 27 🎀
Сегодня у этой серьезной lady на фото день рождения! Принимаю поздравления и крепко-крепко всех обнимаю 💓
Ниже 10 фактов про меня, из которых три — выдумка чистой воды! Попробуете распознать? 😉
1. Закончила музыкальную школу по классу аккордеона
2. Начала ловить рыбу в 3 года
3. Занималась верховой ездой
4. Работаю на острове
5. Заботилась о 50+ домашних питомцах
6. Не умею кататься на …
#paprika_отзыв от прекрасной писательницы Lisa Bell 💜
https://t.me/lisabellfic/2223
❤13👍4🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @paprikamadeit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2024 to 20 October 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
3
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
3
vacant every time we have ever looked
@paprikamadeit named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@sasnezka_daily named in 3 posts, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@lisabellfic named in 2 posts, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@nyutikveretennikova named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PAPRIKA” (@paprikamadeit), 711 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/paprikamadeit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
