大家都要平平安安
❤3

Channel
@paopaodawamg8888888888
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry
18subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003081483294 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @paopaodawamg8888888888 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 5 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/paopaodawamg8888888888 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 01:36 | 18 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:23 | 19 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 20 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:28 | 20 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 5 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
146 reactions across 17 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 50 | 34.2% | |
| 👍 | 36 | 24.7% | |
| 💩 | 14 | 9.59% | |
| 🥰 | 12 | 8.22% | |
| ⚡ | 9 | 6.16% | |
| 🍓 | 5 | 3.42% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 2.74% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 2.74% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 2.74% | |
| custom 5438642075321003231 | 2 | 1.37% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 1.37% | |
| 🥴 | 2 | 1.37% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.685% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 0.685% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 146 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 October 2025 to 25 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @paopaodawamg8888888888. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 October 2025 to 25 November 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
大家都要平平安安
❤3
爱情一直存在
🥰1
心里藏着小星星,生活才能亮晶晶
❤4
不是一见钟情 是那天穿了包臀裙 投稿人:憨憨🎆 用户名:不告诉你 🎆
❤4🍓3🥰2
糟糕透了
👍7🌚1🤡1
自拍 仅限24小时 看到就是赚到
💩7🤡3🤮2
一定要赚到钱!!!!
👍5🥰2❤1🍓1🤣1
泡泡大王驾到~ pinned a video
愿君永如天上月 皎皎千古不染尘
❤3💩2custom 54386420753210032312👍1
哪怕异国他乡 只要饿不死 都是赚的 海阔凭鱼跃 天高任鸟飞.
👍6❤3⚡1🍓1
空空落落又满满当当 昏昏沉沉又明明白白.😑
❤3⚡2💩2👍1
你并不差 你只是没有钱和一个爱你的人.😭
❤9🥰2⚡1👍1💩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @paopaodawamg8888888888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“泡泡大王驾到~” (@paopaodawamg8888888888), 18 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/paopaodawamg8888888888.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.