曝光个骗子 模仿商店客服 谨防上当受骗 用户名:@shanshan988 888号码:+88806947523

Channel
富力跑路曝光
@paolu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
169subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001964785716 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @paolu |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/paolu |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 169 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 171 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 171 | first reading |
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 3 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 37s
- Average length
- 37s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5 | 55.6% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 33.3% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 3 November 2025 to 7 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#群友曝光:NFT拍卖骗局,被骗52000U 事情完整经过整理 一、交易过程 客户乐乐向商家支付 5.2万 USDT。 要求商家代购市场价值约 4.8万的 NFT 用户名。 商家收到款项后,确实在官网完成购买。 二、事后情况 NFT 用户名到账后,商家称: 自己的冷钱包密钥泄露; 钱包内该 NFT 被盗走; 本账号被强制踢出。 商家表示: 不知道密钥何时泄露; 属于“无意识造成的损失”。 三、你们的质疑逻辑 如果真的密钥泄露、账号被黑: 正常情况下应当是设备权限被完全控制或剥夺。 但实际情况是: 商家在账号被踢出后, 仍能及时通过邮箱重新登录, 并且成功更换绑定手机号。 因此你们认为: 他并未真正失去设备控制权; 整个“被盗”过程存在明显不合理之处; 更像是可控行为,而非不可抗力的黑客 谨防被骗 点评:即使真的是因为账户被盗这也属于个人原因,既然是个人原因造成的损失为何要客户承担?嗯?小骗子?
https://t.me/kkkkkkksvip https://t.me/qiya https://t.me/hrs567 https://t.me/@id8248751872 https://t.me/@id5356665551 https://t.me/@7668134435 骗钱畜生曝光! 拉假皮亚群,假富婆担保, @qiya 起亚,笑死个人,而且这个骗子在富豪群里埋伏,群里一曝光他立刻删聊天记录,并踢出假富婆担保群 投稿联系: @weiwei(微微) 或 @ruyi(香奈儿)
避雷,骗子ID @vip520u 用高仿okpay给我转钱,假的okpqy,大家注意分辨,不要被骗,消息马上就双清了!
❤1
曝光个骗子 @hhSoN UQCaMUQRuKsm_j7WvI8-8PYllJr5ychOFp_B76bD5f92RJYG UQDtzf8KeiDqCFuoXxH9IGPh07WLFTuf-sG8xTbsRbGJmf96 打钱就跑 交易需谨慎,切记走担保
👍1
意外发生,责任我们扛。 针对今天富力编外人员骗取客户888号码跑路事件,公司深感痛心与自责。 无论问题出自谁手,客户选择相信我们富力,我们就必须对结果负责。 所有受害客户的损失,由公司协商赔付,绝不甩锅、绝不寒了客户心。 未来我们会更加严格规范管理,用行动守住信任,不负每一份托付。
👍4
📣曝光公告📣 此人以前是富力集团推广业务的编外人员 因业务需要当时挂着富力集团的名称和id在各个群发广告 2月后就已经没有发工资让他做,多次让他改名无动于衷 近期此人接着富力名义大肆行骗 与客户交易行骗 再次公告,此人和富力无关,大家一定警惕 与富力集团商店,NFT,抵押业务交易时 请认准唯一交易员: 富力香奈儿唯一号码 +888 8775 专属用户名 @ruyi @gongzhu
富力集团暂停一切NFT交易担保业务 曝光几个老外骗子,拉假担保群,不知道是什么新技术,用小号匿名发言冒充香奈儿,并且还能拉香奈儿进群,最离谱的是成员在群里点击头像显示的是香奈儿的个人资料, 搞不懂老外的骚操作,交易一定要私聊多次确认,不要相信群成员和群消息,一定要私聊确认 👨🦱用户名(靓号): @godiwalker | @BiPKEP | @melodie 🪪ID: 136623500 ✍️昵称: Likegodia 💎是否会员: 是 👨🦱用户名(靓号): @seuckv 🪪ID: 54157653 ✍️昵称: seuckk 💎是否会员: 是 👨🦱用户名(靓号): @tolstovkaS 🪪ID: 6634728180 ✍️昵称: тolstovka 💎是否会员: 是 👨🦱用户名(靓号): @numetoker 🪪ID: 758599888 ✍️昵称: numtok 💎是否会员: 是 骗子地址:EQAXaGU…
❤2🤣1
🔥金贝至尊杯 · 盛大开启🔥 💰10000美金奖池保底 · 11月18日 晚8点决赛开打! 🏆金贝集团 × AK Poker 联合打造 · 最强德扑盛宴 ⚡️冠军荣誉 × 巨额赏金 × 巅峰对决 💥一手成名的机会,只留给敢上桌的你! 👉立即报名 · 登顶至尊宝座! 🎁后续还有更多福利,敬请期待 📌金贝集团:@jbgq 📌AK扑克:@akpk
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @paolu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 597,646 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@paolu named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“富力跑路曝光” (@paolu), 169 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/paolu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.