Channel
@pang5674
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003730506203 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pang5674 |
| Description | 🚀实盘记录六年，趋势交易者，百万U实盘操作🛫️ ✅ 短线、趋势策略 ✅ 每日盘面分析 ✅ 推荐优质山寨币，现货埋伏 社区咨询： @pang5674 |
| Created | 17 June 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pang5674 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 2 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 2 | first reading |
2 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 2 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
$BTC 中线趋势分析 市场经过一波短暂的反弹之后，重新回到了震荡区间，到底 7 开头是不是底部？ 这个问题还是没有答案，但是从技术面来看，市场的中线趋势还是偏空的，多头无力，但是当前低位的需求也有体现，所以在操作上还是要保持谨慎，多空都不适合格局 政策上，目前美联储已经开始松口，声明中已经开始逐渐放鸽，但是市场认为美国衰退的概率提升了，所以仍然是存在不确定性，市场更愿意选择避险资产，如黄金、白银等。大饼自从 ETF 上市之后，和美股相关性极高，后续关注美股能不能超跌反弹 趋势上，目前中长线仍然是下行趋势，短线走了一波反弹，目前突破失败后，重新来到了震荡区间，下方关注 82000-83000 这个区间的支撑情况，行情想要反转，必须企稳 85000 上方，否则还是维持震荡格局，等待晚间美盘的方向选择 上方阻力：86000-87000 下方支撑：83000-82000 操作上，震荡视角，低吸为主 多头思路：83500 附近…
Channel created
Showing the 2 most recent of 2 posts we hold for @pang5674. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 999,801 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“『以命为棋』实盘策略分析🚀” (@pang5674), 2 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pang5674.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.